It‘s really the other way around for meThat's how I understand it. You'll be able to ignore any and or all of the stuff in the game modes if you like, and just play with the new Civs. It's a great idea.
It‘s really the other way around for meThat's how I understand it. You'll be able to ignore any and or all of the stuff in the game modes if you like, and just play with the new Civs. It's a great idea.
Look, if they do Justinian, you could have Theodora as an adviser, meaning governor.I'd be extremely happy with this (which means it's probably going to be at least partially wrong, sadly!)
Theodora from Civ 5 was my avatar on here for ages; she was such a fun leader and I would actually really love to see her again. I have a sneaking suspicion they will go with Justinian because he's been name-dropped several times on the marketing Twitter account, especially recently. But I'd love to be wrong.
To make it clear it seems the game modes can be turned off an on as part of the normal game.Oh, don't quote me on that. That's just what I gathered from watching the announcement and two other videos: no mechanics for the normal game, but only for the new game modes.
5- I really feel on my bones that we're getting Vietnam this time. EDIT: I hope that, unlike many people here have been stanning, they don't do a dual "Trung Sisters" leader. Instead they should have Trung Trac as the leader and maybe Trung Nhi as an unique advisor or something...
It's because that pack apparently requires R&F, so it would assume the leader has to come from one of those Civs.Seems like everyone is guessing Kublai as the alt leader, but I would love a Sassanid era Persia alternative. Could make for a great combo with Byzantines for the 5th pack.
It's because that pack apparently requires R&F, so it would assume the leader has to come from one of those Civs.
It's because that pack apparently requires R&F, so it would assume the leader has to come from one of those Civs.
Too poorly understood. No knowledge of their language, little knowledge of their leaders...Plus the Balkans are getting rather crowded.Dacia
GS adds all the features from R&F; for it to require R&F specifically it has to be related to one of the civs R&F added.I’m sure I’m lacking an understanding of the technical relationship here, but does that necessarily have to mean it’s an alt leader for a civ from that expansion? Couldn’t it be a different component from the expansion?
The Yuan are generally accepted by Chinese historians as a Chinese dynasty, as are the Manchu Qing. They ruled by the Mandate of Heaven.I keep seeing Kublai mentioned as a leader for both China and Mongolia. Wouldn't people in China be annoyed to see Kublai as a leader for China as the Mongols were an invading dynasty?
If the first were the case, they'd have a separate vanilla and R&F abilities; if it were the latter, it would require R&F or GS.This has been a long held belief, but I honestly feel like it could be something wider than that. For example, we could have an alternate leader for a base civ that just has R&F mechanics as a part of their leader ability. Or the new Civ coming could use R&F mechanics in their civ or leader abilities, and the alternate leader could be totally base game.
I’m sure I’m lacking an understanding of the technical relationship here, but does that necessarily have to mean it’s an alt leader for a civ from that expansion? Couldn’t it be a different component from the expansion?
I sometimes wonder whether I enjoy following the press releases for new material more than I actually enjoy the material itself. So a year of ongoing releases works pretty well for me ;-)
I’m sure I’m lacking an understanding of the technical relationship here, but does that necessarily have to mean it’s an alt leader for a civ from that expansion? Couldn’t it be a different component from the expansion?
As mentioned above, the 5th pack states that only R&F is needed to play. You don't need GS for this pack. GS has the same components of R&F, but the Civs are different. If you only buy GS you still get the loyalty system, dark/golden ages and governors but no Korea, Zulu, Scotland and no Mongolia. Which means it is highly likely that the new leader will require one of these Civs. Kublai Khan just seems the most likely alt leader. I could also see William of Orange too paired with Portugal if they went that route but I'd also like Vietnam too so that's why I'm sticking with that. I like Wilhelmina as a leader anyway.This has been a long held belief, but I honestly feel like it could be something wider than that. For example, we could have an alternate leader for a base civ that just has R&F mechanics as a part of their leader ability. Or the new Civ coming could use R&F mechanics in their civ or leader abilities, and the alternate leader could be totally base game. Just they are paired together so R&F is *technically* required. They may BOTH use R&F Mechanics but have nothing to do with R&F civs. So I wouldn't hold so closely the idea that it MUST be a R&F Civ. Although I am fond of the idea of Kublai Khan and Vietnam
Too poorly understood. No knowledge of their language, little knowledge of their leaders...Plus the Balkans are getting rather crowded.
GS adds all the features from R&F; for it to require R&F specifically it has to be related to one of the civs R&F added.
The Yuan are generally accepted by Chinese historians as a Chinese dynasty, as are the Manchu Qing. They ruled by the Mandate of Heaven.
If the first were the case, they'd have a separate vanilla and R&F abilities; if it were the latter, it would require R&F or GS.