mitsho
Deity
As for most pop-culture impact, Vietnam may get a Vietcong Infantry unique unit. That way, Siam can get the machine gun elephant and Chola then a ship.
Last edited:
My problem with the Vietcong is that it's only use was fighting in a war against their own people. I don't know if that's a unique unit people would want to see.As for most pop-culture impact, Vietnam may get a Vietcong Infantry unique unit. That way, Siam can get the machine gun elephant and Chola then a ship.
If they want to go full meme territory Vietman will have camouflage land unit for the "Americans scared when the trees start speaking Vietnamese" memes.
3/5 civs in NFP have 2 UUs right? What if Vietnam got Vietcong and a different, earlier UU as wellAs for most pop-culture impact, Vietnam may get a Vietcong Infantry unique unit. That way, Siam can get the machine gun elephant and Chola then a ship.
iirc, the vietcong were first used against France.My problem with the Vietcong is that it's only use was fighting in a war against their own people. I don't know if that's a unique unit people would want to see.
Like Trung Nhi?3/5 civs in NFP have 2 UUs right? What if Vietnam got Vietcong and a different, earlier UU as well
As far as I know the Vietcong was officially formed after the First Indochina war so they already achieved independence from France. That doesn't mean there weren't groups of infantry using guerilla tactics against France though.iirc, the vietcong were first used against France.
And while from a literal perspective they were fighting against themselves, they ultimately were essentially used to push back the US and other powers which sought to overthrow the North Vietnamese govt and replace it (as they had in South Vietnam), so it did have an impact reminiscent of the defensive civ themes we’ve seen elsewhere.
I agree with the rest of the statement but I still am not sure if it's the best unique unit for them. If the Mong Dong plays like Civ 5's turtle ship it would be just as reminiscent of a defensive civ.
Plus I feel like it would make more sense if it was a Spec Ops replacement, in the recon line, than a standard melee infantry unit which might not be the best.
Like Trung Nhi?
As far as I know the Vietcong was officially formed after the First Indochina war so they already achieved independence from France. That doesn't mean there weren't groups of infantry using guerilla tactics against France though.
I agree with the rest of the statement but I still am not sure if it's the best unique unit for them. If the Mong Dong plays like Civ 5's turtle ship it would be just as reminiscent of a defensive civ.
Plus I feel like it would make more sense if it was a Spec Ops replacement, in the recon line, than a standard melee infantry unit which might not be the best.
if it was a spec ops replacement it would be essentially useless, even more so than an infantry replacement, which is my main concern
The Mong Dong as far as I'm aware were after the Trung Sister's time, first appearing in the Medieval Era, so it doesn't make sense as a LUU.I can see Trung Trac’s ability being kinda like Suleiman‘s in that we get Trung Nhi as a starting Great General and the Mon Dong as a LUU, with the Vietcong as a UU.
That sounds like what the Iroquois could do. Or better yet make their melee units act like that.The problem with Recon class units is that they require promotions to be good but it is very hard to level them up.
If there is a civ ability that can made every Recon class units starting with both "Camouflage" and "Ambush" promotions they can be insanely strong.
That sounds like what the Iroquois could do. Or better yet make their melee units act like that.
Right. But I think the Iroquois would have a Musketman replacement with maybe something similar to ambush or some sort of promotion that recon units get.Cree does have an unique Scout replacement that has the same combat strength as a Warrior.
My first and obvious pick are the Jurchens/Manchu. Folks have a really long and strongly influential history.Would a North Asia civ be interesting like the Yakut, the Ainu, the Buryats, or Tuva?
Jurchen or Manchu might be interesting, but China would surely disapprove. If we have to have a Tundra civ, the Evenks get my vote. Yakutian horses are kind of adorable, though...Would a North Asia civ be interesting like the Yakut, the Ainu, the Buryats, or Tuva?
It must be a very small boat to only fit one.we've got a boatload of Ameridnians already
The Iroquois, Eastern Algonquians, Mississippians, Five Civilized Tribes, Puebloans, PNW tribes, etc. disagree with your assessment. Not all indigenous Americans were nomadic.The only issue with those is that you're in the Native Indian territory with them without all too many buildings, large empires or somehow well known fighting tactics/units.
But we have had literally all of them in Civ 4. https://civilization.fandom.com/wiki/Native_American_(Civ4)It must be a very small boat to only fit one.
Many of the ones we've already seen covered were, however. So the people are familiar with the challenges of making a full civilisation with the stuff Civ games ask of you.The Iroquois, Eastern Algonquians, Mississippians, Five Civilized Tribes, Puebloans, PNW tribes, etc. disagree with your assessment. Not all indigenous Americans were nomadic.
Yes, but we're talking about Civ6.But we have had literally all of them in Civ 4. https://civilization.fandom.com/wiki/Native_American_(Civ4)
Aztec and Inca don't really fit your objection, though, as they had large cities and empires; the Haudenausonee and Maya also had cities and if not empires then at least confederacies that controlled large swaths of land.Still, we have had Cree, Hodinoshoni, Sioux, Shoshones, Aztecs, Maya, Inca and Mapuche.
Only the Sioux (not in Civ6) and the semi-nomadic Mapuche and Cree, though, and I feel like they got around the non-urbanized nature of the Cree reasonably well. Any additional Native Americans we see will almost certainly be urbanized, unless we get the Navajo--but the Navajo were at least sedentary if not urbanized.Many of the ones we've already seen covered were, however.
In my opinion it doesn't need one. Civilization never really developed in Siberia because the carrying capacity of the land is too low. By contrast, sophisticated, stratified, specialized, urbanized societies did develop in Native North America. It's not really a fair comparison. I wouldn't necessarily object to a well-designed Siberian civ, but I'd find it a bit gimmicky.Siberia hasn't had a single civ yet.
If you want to have the Vietnam War reference, there is a Scout promotion called "Camouflage". Much better and useful than meme achievements IMO.