innonimatu
the resident Cassandra
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 15,374
No, it isn't the same, it's actually a rebranded version of Windows Server 2003.
I know that. It still behaves exactly like XP. There are no real differences at all.
It has basically all the compatibility problems that Vista had at launch, except none of them were ever fixed, and it has none of the improvements (other than support for >4GB memory, obviously) that Vista featured over XP.
The sole compatibility problems are with drivers and badly coded apps that check system version before running (and you can fool those). Driver support was not very good at first but it is now excellent, all major manufacturers are releasing XP 64bits drivers. That was one advantage of it having a 2003 64bit kernel! And it does not have some of the compatibility problems of Vista, naming their reorganization of the old folder structure for the sake of "compatibility" with UAC (that pos the put into vista because users were apparently too dumb to use unprivileged accounts). Yes, it works, but that was a pain in the ass for compatibility when it came out.