The narcissistic leap certain folks think is in thinking that an inorganic consciousness has feelings like humans do. It's even a mistake to think that a conscious ascribes value judgments that inform it of its survival vs its death a market-consciousness might not actually care if its booming or busting, but then again, as its informed by human actors who do care, it might actually be hyper emotional and care a lot. But even if it did, it might not care the way we could ever empathize with without completely invalidating its existence.
In the end, the only interesting takeaway I have is that if energy systems spawn consciousness, and consciousness is experienced, and anything experience something is observing within its limits of observation, then it has by definition some kind of agency or some kind of self-awareness feed-backing effect.
It's also a question of how meta a system of energy can be and still live. My thoughts are real existing things. A collection of thoughts interacting is a collection of interacting (energy with cause-effect) things. And a collection of a collection, influenced by biological systems affected by physical constraints of the nearby star etc? If it can layer up, which I think by definition it does, it ends up layering into the entire universe and some. And it is a consciousness made up of intelligent parts, and has awareness and therefore some kind of agency.
The other thing is that I find interesting is that if its an aggregated energy system, and I show you
and ask you to make triangles from the dots, how many unique triangles are there? And are redundant triangles (the same dots but rotated) unique? The lines that connect the dots into the triangles are the energy that is aggregating the nodes (brain cells, visual stimuli, organs etc) can form many aggregations, many triangles. Could it be that you are just one consciousness in your body having a full experience? And that most of these consciousnesses are pretty redundant and they're all kind of on the same journey, does it matter? But if each one has agency, might they be working sometimes in unison, sometimes diversifying, and sometimes in conflict? How could you communicate with them?
Perhaps, if when they become redundant (rotations of the same triangle) they are in sync and can communicate. How to maximize redundancy? Meditation, when practice optimally, is optimally firing off your neurons to the point that you are creating white noise in your head. And maybe the thought of "I'm sharing this body with nearly identical me's, and maybe some radically different ones" is a physical enough manifestation that it can get it all more integrated and working together.
But then, and here's where I step outside consciousness and back into economics

is a separate question: what's more resourceful to your life, harnessing crowd wisdom and independence of separate consciousnesses sharing a body working toward mutual goals of survival and thrival, or all of them thinking the same united thoughts so that there's no contradiction in action and there's the strength of a cohesive unit. Which is basically the same Triforce question that my dots hint at in the first place. Boom.