Crusade of Inbev: Budweiser under siege.

philippe

FYI, I chase trains.
Joined
Mar 24, 2002
Messages
11,437
Location
Bourgondische Kreitz
Belgian-Brazilian brewing giant InBev wooed Anheuser-Busch on Thursday, vowing to respect its St. Louis heritage and not close any US breweries if it accepts a 46-billion-dollar (30-billion-euro) takeover bid.
InBev, which already owns leading brands such as Stella Artois, Beck's, Leffe and Brahma, offered 65 dollars a share for Anheuser-Busch on Wednesday, seeking to build an unrivalled global brewer.

Even though the St. Louis, Missouri-based company said it would "review the merits" of the takeover, InBev faces stiff opposition from local politicians and beer lovers, who were quick to attack the takeover.

The success of the takeover offer will ultimately be decided by Anheuser-Busch's shareholders.


In early trading in New York, the US beer-maker's stock was 5.9 percent stronger at 61.87 dollars while in Brussels InBev shares fared even better, surging 6.17 percent to close at 50.21 euros.

Eager to ease fears about the takeover, InBev chief executive Carlos Brito said that Anheuser-Busch's hometown of St. Louis would not be only the headquarters of the combined group's North American business but also its international brands.

Moreover, Anheuser-Busch's well-known Budweiser brew would become the merged company's global flagship brand alongside InBev's Stella Artois, Beck's and Brahma lines.

"We see the potential to take the Budweiser brand and develop it across our foot print," Brito told a conference call, detailing the deal.

But perhaps more importantly for Anheuser-Busch's employees, Britos said: "There will be no closure of US breweries as part of this transaction."


With a takeover, InBev, which claims the title of the world's biggest beer maker, would create close to a 100-billion-dollar business in the most ambitious act of corporate consolidation since last year's credit crunch shook the markets.

Anheuser-Busch, which traces its roots to the 1850s, has historically been cool on being sold, with the Busch family playing a major role.

Britos assurances come amid anxiety about the deal in Missouri, where Governor Matt Blunt said in a statement he considered the bid "deeply troubling" and said he was "strongly opposed to the sale of Anheuser-Busch."

"Anheuser-Busch is a great Missouri company, a great employer, a great corporate citizen and the maker of great products that are enjoyed in Missouri and around the world," he said.

Meanwhile a website, SaveBudweiser.com, was collecting signatures in an online petition opposing the sale.

"We will need to scream now more than ever to make sure that the board of directors and others involved hear our voices and that we don't want them to accept the offer," said a notice on the website, the operators of which were not identified.


As of Thursday, more than 31,000 people had signed the online petition.

Analyst Kris Kippers at Belgian brokerage Petercam said that although 65 dollars a share was "a good bid," InBev might have to raise its offer to win shareholders over.

"To have a knock-out bid I think the market would expect 70 dollars," he told AFP.

While not ruling out a higher offer entirely, Britos stressed: "I think our 65 dollar all-cash offer is a full and fair price."

I've seen the last few days some weird kind of sentiment from some Americans saying: well Bud is American, how can it be taken over by an Belgian company? Besides, it's "Bud" man, come on now.

So, is this a backlash of globalisation? How do poeple feel that their favourite homeknown companies are taken over by bigger companies?

Do you see any advantages and disadvantages in this takeover?
 
Hypocrisy Europe cries every time an Indian company takes over Acrelor, or Land Rover or Jaguar or whatever. Get over it.
 
HAHAHA! So from now on if this goes through, Europeans can't gripe about crappy American beer becuase it'll be European beer now!
 
Isn't there an older "Budweiser" brewery somewhere in Central Europe?

Cleo
 
Yeah, there is. It is a Czech brewery IIRC. To be honest, the American company should have lost the lawsuits for the name rights.
 
I've seen the last few days some weird kind of sentiment from some Americans saying: well Bud is American, how can it be taken over by an Belgian company? Besides, it's "Bud" man, come on now.

"Bud" might sound fully American to you, but you guys pretty much stole it from the Czechs.

If you order a Budweiser in the Czech Republic (and various other assorted European countries), you are going to receive the original Czech version of the brew.

So whatever, now a Belgian-Brazilian company takes over. Maybe they'll allow the original Budweiser to be sold in the U.S., which would be a very good thing.
 
"Bud" might sound fully American to you, but you guys pretty much stole it from the Czechs.

If you order a Budweiser in the Czech Republic (and various other assorted European countries), you are going to receive the original Czech version of the brew.

So whatever, now a Belgian-Brazilian company takes over. Maybe they'll allow the original Budweiser to be sold in the U.S., which would be a very good thing.

Please learn a bit of History. It was actually Austrian immigrants from Budweis (now in Czech republic but then in Austria-Hungary) who started brewering Budweiser and they were indeed the first beer brand named Budweiser in the world. Previously Budweiser just referred to any beer brewed in Budweis. So in reality the Czech company should have lost all rights as the American company was in business with that brand name a good 60 years before any other company tried to use that name.
 
Please learn a bit of History. It was actually Austrian immigrants from Budweis (now in Czech republic but then in Austria-Hungary) who started brewering Budweiser and they were indeed the first beer brand named Budweiser in the world. Previously Budweiser just referred to any beer brewed in Budweis. So in reality the Czech company should have lost all rights as the American company was in business with that brand name a good 60 years before any other company tried to use that name.

Budweiser is just a translation of Budějovický, which refers to České Budějovice. Beer has been brewed there since at least the 1200s.

It's just silly that a company owns the rights to the word "Budweiser", as Budweiser just refers to any sort of beer brewed in that area / in that style.

It'd be like a company owning rights to the word frankfurter, hamburger, genoa salami, etc.

In any case, Belgians taking over a beer operation can't be a bad thing ;)
 
I've seen the last few days some weird kind of sentiment from some Americans saying: well Bud is American, how can it be taken over by an Belgian company? Besides, it's "Bud" man, come on now.

So, is this a backlash of globalisation? How do poeple feel that their favourite homeknown companies are taken over by bigger companies?

Do you see any advantages and disadvantages in this takeover?
Bud is apparently fleeing to the Mexicans for protection from the Belgians. Better build that wall to keep Spuds McKenzie out of Mexico:

Anheuser-Busch has entered preliminary merger talks with Mexican brewery Grupo Modelo, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal Thursday.

A merger between the two companies could help the American brewing company hold off Belgian beer maker InBev's $46.3 billion unsolicited takeover bid that was announced Wednesday.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/12/news/companies/anheuser_grupo_modelo/?postversion=2008061217
 
Well whenever I feel like hot steamy piss in a tall glass I reach for the nearest Budweiser, which is usually at the shoulder of some American in Canada enjoying the lower drinking age here. Its too bad they don't realize they don't have to drink cheap piss water either.
 
This is horrible. If the masses don't drink the puke water that is Budweiser, how can I be smug about drinking my clearly superior Stella?

The masses kept drinking Coors after its merger with Molson, and Miller after its buyout buy South African Brewing. So the masses will keep drinking Bud and you can continue to drink your mediocre Stella (the Bud of Europe).
 
yes, I do think the merge won't affect the poor quality of the beer in the USA, after all the consumers are used to drinking it, why improve it?

But it could add a greater selection of beers from other countries...

And stella is mediocre indeed compared to "Jupiler".

To claim Bud is superior to stella is more a reaction of fervent nationalism then of taste.
 
Back
Top Bottom