bernie14
Filter Manipulator
Do you think it is obvious? Seems to me many assumptions need to be made to connect one to the otherGenius question, maybe it somehow connected in a way
Do you think it is obvious? Seems to me many assumptions need to be made to connect one to the otherGenius question, maybe it somehow connected in a way
Cant DNA researchers identify the race of people by their genetic codes?
Do you think it is obvious? Seems to me many assumptions need to be made to connect one to the other
Cant DNA researchers identify the race of people by their genetic codes?
Please pay more attention!
This is settled already with my discussion with Truthy, your question is comparable with "can't our eyes differentiates the color of people by their skin's color?' the answer of this question doesn't proves anything in regards to social classification of human based on their skin color.
So do the genetic group classification are not comparable in any level of reality with race in a sociocultural sense. Both are not related.
If people disagree about the existence of race they probably agree tribalism and ethnicity are real.
Ease (and cost) of replaceability is the biggest determining factor of wages.
Not the value added.
This is why you have unions, so that workers can't be "just replaced", at least not easily. I guess this goes deep into the specifics, but reason why many workers in industries which do produce a lot of value, have been able to negotiate such good wages is precisely because they produce value and can't be replaced. Then again, that's in Finland, maybe it's different in other countries. Even if your union laws are radically different, surely you have to admit that value added at least has some effect on wages, even if it obviously isn't the only factor?Not really. That is a function of bargaining power, which is related to your ability to be replaced and who owns the capital.
Culture is a product of men, it's a dynamic variable and it has loose classification and adaptable.
It must not be coming out from nowhere, there should be a good reason behind the coincide-ntal coincidence
The fact that immigrant are coming from either a nation, a culture, a religion or a skin colour that is racialized upon is definitely a determining factors isn't it?
no, I don't think that "race" and "racism" mean the same thingThis is settled already with my discussion with Truthy, your question is comparable with "can't our eyes differentiates the color of people by their skin's color?' the answer of this question doesn't proves anything in regards to social classification of human based on their skin color.
So do the genetic group classification are not comparable in any level of reality with race in a sociocultural sense. Both are not related.
And women!
no, I don't think that "race" and "racism" mean the same thing
if you're out in the wilderness 100,000 years ago and meet someone of a different race, you wont be thinking about average intelligence. You'll be thinking about surviving the encounter and 'race' can help inform that process, especially if your last experience was negative.