Dumb and Stupid Quotes Thread: Idiotic Source and Context are Key.

Yes, and you can cure them, as well. Unfortunately, you can't undo Dracula: Untold, asides from applying damnatio memoriae on everyone who ever watched it, a feat only done by rabid Stalinists.
 
Well, you can reduce their swelling and you can have them removed, but I don't think you can 'cure' haemorrhoids.
 
Curses! WebMD has lied to me. Again.

Curing rhinitis by putting garlic and honey is the worst idea that has ever been put into existence.
 
I think haemorrhoids are more like period pains - you can take medication to mitigate them, but if they go away by themselves, they don't need to be 'cured', and if they don't, well, then you have more fun.

(N.B. I am so ridiculously not a doctor, it's funny.)
 
I've never had period pains, but I'd be willing to bet (not being a gambling man) that piles (which I have had) is absolutely nothing like them.
 
No, you don't get to claim significance with a P-value cutoff of 0.10.
"Regardless of actual gender or performance, students rated the perceived female instructor significantly more harshly than the perceived male instructor, which suggests that a female instructor would have to work harder than a male to receive comparable ratings."
-MacNell L, Driscoll A, Hunt AN. 2014. What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education.

10755_2014_9313_Fig1_HTML.gif

Figure 1
Comparison of the mean of student ratings across actual instructor gender (left two columns) and perceived instructor gender (right two columns). The difference between the right two columns is significant to the p&#8201;<&#8201;=0.10 level.
 
That too.

Anyway, I don't think waterboarding is that newfangled, Mr. 3raqi. And tu quoque is of course a logical fallacy.
"How can you call the islamic state barbaric? Look at the psycopaths in your prisons torturing people with methods never seen in history."
-Abu Bakr Al 3raqi (@dodo1924d), in response to the CIA torture report
 
I thought the whole controversy was these methods were seen before in history, and definitively known as torture then.
 
It occurred to me, earlier, that the common thread running through all these tortures is the lack of bloodshed. Things like water-boarding or exposure are brutal and barbarous, no doubt, but there's a certain distance, an extent to which you can say "he died" rather than "I killed him". And while that appears entirely disingenuous, a fig leaf to keep the warhawks on board, I wonder if it's playing out on some more immediate psychological level, too, that by avoiding more traditional, blood-spilling tortures, they can say to themselves "This isn't torture, I'm not a torturer". I wonder if the lie is for them, as well as for the rest of us.
 
It occurred to me, earlier, that the common thread running through all these tortures is the lack of bloodshed. Things like water-boarding or exposure are brutal and barbarous, no doubt, but there's a certain distance, an extent to which you can say "he died" rather than "I killed him". And while that appears entirely disingenuous, a fig leaf to keep the warhawks on board, I wonder if it's playing out on some more immediate psychological level, too, that by avoiding more traditional, blood-spilling tortures, they can say to themselves "This isn't torture, I'm not a torturer". I wonder if the lie is for them, as well as for the rest of us.
Like the way the Nazis developed gas chambers specifically to avoid causing their own soldiers trauma from massacres? You might well be on to something there.
 
It occurred to me, earlier, that the common thread running through all these tortures is the lack of bloodshed. Things like water-boarding or exposure are brutal and barbarous, no doubt, but there's a certain distance, an extent to which you can say "he died" rather than "I killed him". And while that appears entirely disingenuous, a fig leaf to keep the warhawks on board, I wonder if it's playing out on some more immediate psychological level, too, that by avoiding more traditional, blood-spilling tortures, they can say to themselves "This isn't torture, I'm not a torturer". I wonder if the lie is for them, as well as for the rest of us.

OK.

I think if the body is somehow "intact", it's not provable that torture took place at all.

How do you feel about purely psychological torture? How about being played a Justin Bieber track continuously for 6 months? Would that constitute torture?

How about sleep deprivation?

How about staged fake executions?
 
OK.

I think if the body is somehow "intact", it's not provable that torture took place at all.

How do you feel about purely psychological torture? How about being played a Justin Bieber track continuously for 6 months? Would that constitute torture?

How about sleep deprivation?

How about staged fake executions?
I'm pretty sure playing Justin Bieber for 6 minutes is considered torture.
 
It occurred to me, earlier, that the common thread running through all these tortures is the lack of bloodshed. Things like water-boarding or exposure are brutal and barbarous, no doubt, but there's a certain distance, an extent to which you can say "he died" rather than "I killed him". And while that appears entirely disingenuous, a fig leaf to keep the warhawks on board, I wonder if it's playing out on some more immediate psychological level, too, that by avoiding more traditional, blood-spilling tortures, they can say to themselves "This isn't torture, I'm not a torturer". I wonder if the lie is for them, as well as for the rest of us.

I'm not sure about that. You still hit a button. When you lock someone in a gas chamber and hit the button that inserts the gas, you're killing them. You don't get the blood on your hands, but yet you murder them, and that'll stay with you.
 
I'm pretty sure that dropping a bomb on someone from 30,000 feet up doesn't have the immediate impact on the perpetrator that strangling someone with one's bare hands does.

People have traditionally sought to put some distance between themselves and their victims. All in the name of efficiency, of course. And in the interests of their own safety.
 
Irony died when it met Poe's Law.
 
Back
Top Bottom