He didn't have a taser. He was unarmed.
"The police stopped an unarmed man." is a factually correct statement. You are disingenuous at best.
it is not the statement implied by title of linked articles, however. which is why i am not the one being disingenuous here.
once he took the weapon from the police officer, he was not "unarmed". obviously, he took the weapon prior to being "fatally shot", therefore he was not "unarmed" at the time of being shot. that is factual reality.
the linked article titles an unarmed black man was shot. no, a black man was stopped, resisted arrest, forcibly stole a weapon, and was shot after doing so. when one is in possession of a weapon, they are not "unarmed".
for legal purposes, even grabbing the weapon counts as "armed". but at the time this guy got clapped, the police officer no longer had control of the taser. it's an unfortunate situation, but the decision to shoot was fine. it is not hard to envision a scenario where lyoya uses stolen taser to render officer defenseless, since he used physical force to take it.
It should be noted the cop had Iyoya face down on the ground with the cop on top controlling him. Then the cop pulled his firearm and shot Iyoya twice in the back of the head. All because his license tag had expired..
you could at least acknowledge the details of the case. even other posters who don't agree with me at least addressed the fact that lyoya stole a weapon through physical force prior to being shot. claiming that this happened "because his tag expired" isn't merely disingenuous, it's lying.
He just told me to get these fixed and drove off.
i'm going to guess you did not ignore officer commands, leave your vehicle, run away, and fight back, and steal a weapon from the officer. non-trivial details. even if you're not willing to acknowledge lyoya's conduct, it seems you are quite capable of avoiding it yourself. i think you could guess what happens if you try it, too, which is why you don't.