Emma Watson (Hermione in Harry Potter) Gets a CGI cup size breast increase.

Those are two separate pictures, you can tell by how Emma look more stern in the second picture compared to the first. Clearly a case of making a mountain out of a molehill in more ways than one :groucho:

Quite so.

There are other differences; of angle to the camera of the other blonde girl.

And very likely she was breathing in in one and out in the other.
 
Surely the difference between the two pictures is very small?
 
Surely the difference between the two pictures is very small?

Yes, minor a difference for sure.

But why would the movie makers feel the need at all to do anything sexual for an underage girl in a movie like this? In the US being under the age of 18 is a minor.

Like if this happen in the movie Kids, I wouldn't see anything wrong with it. Kids was an art film about teen sexuality and full of AIDS. Same goes with the movie, "Now and Then" with Christina Ricci.

Here I think some guy thought having a movie poster with Hermione having bigger boobs would mean bigger sales. Also would this start a slippery slop? We all know sex sells, is it ok to sell the sex (I'm not talking intercourse, duh) of an underage, but post puberty (14-17/yrs old) boy/girl? Even in a very minor way such as this? When does it become to much, if at all?
 
I just want to say that the OP's name fits this thread well.
 
I have a serious question:

Does there exist a man here who would say, after seeing the altered photo, "I'd hit it!", but when shown the unaltered photo, would say, "Nope, wouldn't do that"?

I wouldn't even notice the difference. And yes, I'd hit it in both cases. ;)

Non moderater action: said a stupid thing.
 
But why would the movie makers feel the need at all to do anything sexual for an underage girl in a movie like this? In the US being under the age of 18 is a minor.

Well, according to wiki and this there are only few states with age of consent as 18 so you can't generalize that to whole US. Also in the majority of the rest of the world the age of consent is less than 18 (in most European countries the age of consent is somewhere between 14 and 16).
 
I don't see a diffrence. And she isn't underage. And it doesn;t matter. And I would bang her regardless.
 
I wouldn't bang her either way (I'm married, she's a bit too young for me, and I'm not into casual sex in any case) but I'd be much less likely to ogle her in her 'undoctored' form.
 
So Emma Watson (Hermione in Harry Potter) Gets a CGI cup size breast increase in an IMAX poster. Is this wrong?

There's a nice resort near Hermione I stayed in, about 20 years ago, called Kappa Club. It's got a great beach, great activities, and the food is fantastic! I highly recommend it.

Oh wait, you're not talking about Hermione, Greece.
 
I wouldn't bang her either way (I'm married, she's a bit too young for me, and I'm not into casual sex in any case) but I'd be much less likely to ogle her in her 'undoctored' form.
I continue to see no appreciable difference in oggle-ability between the before and after. If they were really trying to sex-up the poster, they should have given her more than that, and if they were affraid that people would get all outraged if the change were noticible, then why edit the poster at all?

It's a total waste of the effort.
 
Back
Top Bottom