Emma Watson (Hermione in Harry Potter) Gets a CGI cup size breast increase.

But why would the movie makers feel the need at all to do anything sexual for an underage girl in a movie like this? In the US being under the age of 18 is a minor.
She's not underage, she's 17. The legal age in the UK is 16.

Shock-horror: Not all the world is the USA.
 
Am i the only one here who doesnt think shes that hot at all........

She just looks like a young kid to me, that's all. Course, given my age, I'm attracted to good looking ladies in their 30s and 40s, not teeny-boppers. That era of my life is long since past. To take another fine UK speciman for an example, I'm still mightily attracted to the sweet Miss Samantha Fox. Yes, I will one day woo her back to "our team." :D
 
She's not underage, she's 17. The legal age in the UK is 16.

Shock-horror: Not all the world is the USA.

I think you and others are confusing age of majority and age of consent.
The Age of majority is the threshold of adulthood as it is conceptualized in law. It is the chronological moment when children legally assume majority control over their persons and their actions and decisions, thereby terminating the legal control and legal responsibilities of their parents over and for them.
And in most of the world, the Age of Majority is 18.

And besides, i already posted how with other legal "art" sites with little kids, that this wasn't a big deal compared to sick crap like that. And if that is legal, can't really argue this. Or at least, shouldn't when that other stuff is legal anyways.
 
Random idea regarding this "legal age" deal:

Women around me have been dressing themselves up from long before the legal age. Girls were wearing skirts, makeup, and fashionable underwear ever since I was six.

How do I know? From when the girls were doing somersaults on the playground. :D


Who cares what the "legal age" is??? That's regarding sex. We're not talking about sex. We're talking about dressing-up, and whether it's real or virtual Photoshopping is unimportant.

It's legal to make a 17 year old girl appealling.
 
An HP actually makes her uglier in other ways...

You know IRL there arn't two caterpillars mating on her forehead, she has normal eyebrows, not the massive bushes the storyline gives her.
 
It's legal for a 17 year old to do just about everything except drink and porn. Not everywhere is America...

As a random question, why the heck is it legal to have sex at 17 but not make (or in some areas, look at) porn? That seems quite arbitary.
 
As a random question, why the heck is it legal to have sex at 17 but not make (or in some areas, look at) porn? That seems quite arbitary.

Because you want them to get in a year of practice before they hit the big screen!
 
First, she's not underage.

Second:
I couldn't tell the difference until I superimposed one of the posters (the left one) over the right picture.

The light grey area appears to be where the manipulation was done.

That's unnoticeable.

Third:
The increasing of her minor boob size was completely unnecessary.

So true!

Fourth:
:lol: love it, remember, sex sells kids!
or is the other way around? kids sell sex? :lol:

Both! :lol:
 
But she's not even supposed to be hot! She's not ugly in the books, but far away from hot. And ive noticed how ugly Harry has become in the next movie. To me he looks like some sort of rat.
 
I think you and others are confusing age of majority and age of consent. And in most of the world, the Age of Majority is 18.
I don't see how this is relevant. Where does the law state that you can't graphically edit the sizes of girls' breasts, if they are under the age of majority.
 
I don't see how this is relevant. Where does the law state that you can't graphically edit the sizes of girls' breasts, if they are under the age of majority.

Just to be clear, I was talking about making money off of the selling and enhancing of a minor sexuality (even in a minor case like that). But this is somewhat moot. Being as I posted this 3 days ago.

Hey guys, it's cool. This isn't a big deal, you can close this thread now.

With child model site like this being legal "http://www.ella-mod.com/preview.html", alittle CGI is nothing.

Oh and from what i was told, you don't want to see the rest of the pics.

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2002/05/52345
 
Maybe it wasn't to sell her as a sexual object, but just to make her look more mature, to fit in with the storyline that way.
If the silly girl happens to have grown up without a proper bust, then the film-makers still want to portray her as going through a good growth phase anyway.
 
But she's not even supposed to be hot! She's not ugly in the books, but far away from hot.

That's true. She is described as kind of plain looking, but you know how Hollywood is - they think that the best actresses to play ugly characters are hot actresses with glasses and bad hair. (I'm looking at you, Ugly Betty). Genuinely unattractive actresses can't even get those roles.
 
I don't think there should be anything legally wrong with it, though it may still be seen as not a good thing.

I agree it's rather inconsistent in that it seems to be okay for corporations and mainstream media to sexualise images of those underage, but an individual doing the same thing is branded a pedophile and locked up.

She's 17. That means she's legal to have sex in the UK as the age is 16 here. She is therefore not underage.
Personally I think anything over 16 should be okay, but note that even though the age of consent is 16 in the UK, it's still 18 when it comes to images. I don't know what the law is on this sort of stuff, but a topless photo of her for example would be child porn.

Edit: We also have a law against fake child porn - so it would be illegal to take a photo of her, and photoshop her into being nude.

This example probably wouldn't count, as the image isn't porn, but it's hard for me to see why sexualising an image for mainstream advertising is okay, whilst someone who photoshops an image in private gets put in prison and categorised as a pedophile.
 
Do teenage girls not stuff their bras with tissues or wear padded bras in the states? :confused:
 
But she's not even supposed to be hot! She's not ugly in the books, but far away from hot. And ive noticed how ugly Harry has become in the next movie. To me he looks like some sort of rat.
From what I recall, that should be rather accurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom