BNP = British National Party, not British Nazi Party.
I'd appreciate if you didn't accuse me of being a Nazi in the future.
No guaranties. You've already posted your horrid views on this forum. You don't like being called a Nazi, then stop acting like one (Though I highly doubt this will happen). But since you continue to post these alt-right demagoguery, don't be surprised people call you a Nazi.
For the record,
@Aiken_Drumn did not call you a Nazi. If you actually
read his post you'd see he was describing the BNP and it's infamy of it's topic on this forum back when it was debated about years ago (Hense why I called it a dumpster fire). He wasn't calling
you a Nazi. This is the same problem you have when I called your
posts white supremacists
talking points and took it as me calling you a white supremacist.
At this point, the mask has already flown off your face and people on this forum have already made their judgement based on the views you've posted. And any benifit of the doubt are washed away.
I don't see Europe becoming Islamicized or Bantufied as an improvement.
I don't see Europe scumming to fascism as an improvement.
No, if George Washington had a right to break away from Britain, Robert Lee had a right to break away from the United States. Let's be consistent here.
You
do realize the Confederate States of America lost right? Besides Cutlass has already have that covered so I won't bother you lecturing on the nuances of American History.
No, but all indigenous European cultures have a lot of similarities that they don't have with Islamic culture.
And How much of European cultures are you aware of? From what I can tell, your presumption of European culture is one big monolithic culture that should be pure.
The word you are looking for is "drivel", but you're confusing my posts with yours when you call them drivel.
LOL, I'm sorry but who's the one posting alt-right Nazi crap? Look yourself in the mirror before you call other people's post "drivel".
Now was that too hard to admit that you're an alt-right white supremacist and white nationalist demagogue?
I would say the same of you.
No, I want to have a say because I don't want authoritarian bigoted fascists like yourself to ever gain power. If you ever set up an white ethnostate in South Africa, I will send my voice to my senator and representatives to push forward a policy to set up sanctions on your Nationalist Afrikaans nation and back the South African government to push back a secessionist state. We've done it before with South Africa after the fall of the USSR when they became an international embarrassment of apartheid and we'll most certainly do it again with your Nationalist Afrikaans nation.
Yes, we are an ethnoreligious group, only a minority of our ancestry is Dutch, we have our own language and culture, our language vastly improves upon Dutch in terms of having a sensible spelling and grammar system, and it sounds better and is better for lyrics, poetry, and literature. Many Israeli Jews can see the similarity between Boers and Jews.
Oh bullfeathers. You just want that sweet sweet victim status. Again, no, you are not an ethnoreligous group no matter how much you stomp your feet on the ground like a two year old. Having a branch derivative of Calvinism does not grant you the same status as Jews, the Amish, nor the Mennonites. Your language is a dialect of Dutch, no different the Quebecois French, Japanese Kansai dialect, Southern American English, &e. You're perhaps the
only Afrikaner that I know that ever holds this delusion. You only have the tribalist notion of Afrikaans Nationalism,
that is it. Your Afrikaans Nationalist movement are no more special than old racists hicks in the deep south longing for the rise of the Confederate States of America. I've done a deep dive on your claims and there are
no claims that Afrikaans are an ethnoreligious group. Even the Wikipedia article that you love to source from states that Afrikaners are a South African
ethnic group descended from Dutch settlers and I highly doubt anyone here would entertain your delusional claim.
You have the right to leave your country, but not necessarily the right to enter any country of your choosing.
The United Nations disagrees with your view point. The United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not care about your feelings.
I'm not the one entering in a nice cafe puking out alt-right drivel and taking a dump in the middle of the floor. The burden of proof is on
you. Since you refuse to proved sources for claims, I'm just going to presume you're just parroting talking points from an alt-right demagogue or that you're an alt-right demagogue yourself.
A nationalist state has a unique identity based on heritage.
As was Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, The Japanese Showa Statist Military Dictatorship, and Francoist Spain.
A multicultural state has no identity other than a piece of paper called a "passport".
There are a ton of Americans and Canadians, just to list a few, that will very very much disagree with you with that claim. You only see it as having "no identity" because you loathe the idea of people of other cultures and ethnicities co-existing with one another in harmony. You only see the idea of multiculturalism as a degenerate concept that keeps you up at night.
I would tolerate them just fine in their own homelands.
Europe should never have taken them in in the first place. I hope that Éric Zemmour wins in France next time.
Because Europe isn't their homeland. I don't understand why refugees are even granted citizenship, it should be understood that their presence is temporary, and they should be discouraged from putting down roots.
They symbolize a lack of desire to assimilate. This is different from the Amerindian boarding schools, so let's not debate that again. Muslims chose to come to Canada. The least they can do is dress Canadian.
Again, your idea of assimilate is to annihilate one's individual culture and identity. As I said before, Muslims have the freedom to dress as they wish. You on the other hand would
restrict a Muslim's freedom to dress the way they want to. They only symbolize a lack of desire to assimilate,
to you because you see them as foreigners with a degenerate culture and that you want to take away their freedom of expression. What you are essentially telling these migrants is "conform or else".
It does not matter if Europe (or any part of the world) is not their homeland. What matters is that they fled away from a terrible situation to find a better life in an environment that's more stable. You keep crying "why isint anyone thinking of the Boers!?", yet willing to let migrants and refugees suffer at the hands of fate in a situation not favorable to them shows how much lack of empathy you have for people outside of your group (In this case, a small white supremacist group). You want a humanitarian hand to be extended to you and the Boers while at the same breath don't want to extend that same humanitarian hand to immigrants and refugees and yet sitting on your butt while hosting a pity party and exclaiming "oh woe is me" as you exclaim bigoted remarks towards people of other races, cultures, ethnicities, gender, and sex. But I guess you'd be one of those xenophonic white supremacists that would turn away Vietnamese boat people fleeing Communist Vietnam in the 1970s since they would disrupt the purity of your country's demographics.
You made the statement, "Europe should never have taken them in the first place", where the hell are they suppose to go? If you say "lol, they can just stay in their homeland" just shows how much lack of empathy you have towards people whom aren't white nationalist Boers.
