Gay Marriage: What's the Huge Deal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
only 26? A bad example of what?

I still haven't a clue what relevance 26 has. Honest injun.

Hah, I do. I can't wait till the countdown gets to 0. 20 and this is one. :p
 
Oh, it took me a while 19 to realise what you guys were talking about. But I thought the mods didn't close large threads anymore?
This thread isn't totally pointless, though, it's always good to ask questions and GW obviously put a lot of work in his OP and thus didn't intend to troll.
 
It sorta is, depending on the premises of the discussion. When people get trapped trying to make decisions regarding policies where they are effectively choosing life vs. life vs. life then the moral calculus often crutches with quantitative measures and raw numbers. Even if TF doesn't like utilitarianism.
Most Christian churches don't like utilitarianism, either, contradicting the Bible as thoroughly and fundamentally as it does, so I don't know if Civ King can get much out of that logic. :dunno:
 
So are late term abortions.
rules without exceptions are easier to make when the number of would-be exceptions are incredibly low. When it's a late term pregnancy gone wrong in many cases it is easier to terminate the pregnancy by Caesarean section which depending on how late the pregnancy could have a substantial chance for the baby to survive.
:nope:

Maybe I'm just dim or summat.

:dunno:

C'est une mystère!

17

Sum the number and the post number :p
 
13 and this is one. :p ;)
 
Oh I get it now, we're counting down until this reaches 1000 posts so the mods will lock it. Very good. :rolleyes:
 
And it's at -9 and this is one.

I'd appreciate it if the 1000th post was again about Gay Marriage.
 
4706853733_6b06f9bff7_z.jpg

5 and this is one... And the thread is going more and more off-topic with each post... counting mine.
 
Gay Marriage should be legal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom