So you support the firing and jailing of the officer outed as instigating vandalism and arson?Burn a store, go to jail. Loot a store, go to jail. Easy math.
So you support the firing and jailing of the officer outed as instigating vandalism and arson?Burn a store, go to jail. Loot a store, go to jail. Easy math.
Now that's a leap. Where did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't. I have stated many times that the problem is not resolved yet and much work still needs to be done. Learn to read.You're very insistent that things are better than at some unspecified point in the past. That's true. Nobody's asking for institutional racism to be solved overnight. People are asking for it to be recognised, and not dismissed (however your intentions) with "she got punished, problem solved".
No, you charge people for the crimes they commit.So you support the firing and jailing of the officer outed as instigating vandalism and arson?
I'm confused. You were talking about sending people to jail for crimes committed. There is evidence a police officer has committed a crime. It should be simple to say "I support his firing and jailing", no?No, you charge people for the crimes they commit.
And yet you're consistently arguing against people demanding more reparations now. You keep saying these things take time. The fact that you're arguing against people demanding justice now, against people critical of US police in general, are arguments you choose to make. They're arguments that work against people trying to resolve the problems you seem to agree with.Now that's a leap. Where did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't. I have stated many times that the problem is not resolved yet and much work still needs to be done. Learn to read.
Why? It was the bums that burned it down. Sue them and take the damages out of their welfare checks.
I believe I said that dismantling the police force wasn't practical because it would lead to anarchy.
I certainly support his firing at the very least. His jailing, that’s for the courts to decide and he should be given a fair trial. Based on what I know now, I would vote for conviction.I'm confused. You were talking about sending people to jail for crimes committed. There is evidence a police officer has committed a crime. It should be simple to say "I support his firing and jailing", no?
Nothing to hide! I’m anti-bum and pro-worker. The looters and rioters are bums; the people that work for a living aren’t going out and smashing windows and stealing stuff.not even trying to hide it, eh?
I believe I said that dismantling the police force wasn't practical because it would lead to anarchy.
And I not complaining, just trying to refute. Unfortunately most here aren't really interested in an actual discussion.
And how are you going to replace it without facing the same issues? Do you think the military would do any better?
As a general rule, people in the productive ranks of society do not go around ransacking businesses and start buildings on fire.What is it about these people that make you think they collect welfare or are bums?
Well, let’s get the names of these model citizens, upright and outstanding members of society, so that we can pin medals on them for their liberation of a shopping cart of Ding Dongs and Ho Hos. For they are the real heroes.I'm willing to bet a sizeable number of those rioting and looting hold jobs, probably more jobs than you do, amadeus.