Great Quotes III: Source and Context are Key

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Einstein was wrong when he said, 'God does not play dice'. Consideration of black holes suggests, not only that God does play dice, but that he sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen."
~ Professor Stephen Hawking (1942 - 2018)
#1, I didn't even know he'd died. :scared:

#2, you mean Hawking was Yang the whole time???
 
In the winter of 1757, the second year of the Seven Years' War in Europe, Prussian military fortunes were at a low ebb. The coalition facing the Prussians was so massive that despite a colossal victory over the allies' western armies at Roßbach a month before, Friedrich II and his men were still horrifically outnumbered and facing a large enemy army deep in their home territory. Shortly before attacking the Austrian army at Leuthen, Friedrich II took the unusual - for him - step of addressing his officers in person to give a pep talk. Although there are many versions of what became known as the Parchwitz speech (for the name of the village in which it was given), most of the accounts agree on the tenor, if not the particulars. It went down in German military history as possibly the most inspiring and iconic example of military leadership in national history.

It's perhaps best known for the line, "We must beat the enemy, or let ourselves be buried in front of his [artillery] batteries." [1]

At one point during the speech, the king used a rhetorical tactic unusual for him, saying, "If any one of you doesn't think [that you are up for the coming struggle], give us your farewells. I will do the same without the slightest reproach." [2] Konstantin von Billerbeck, a field-grade infantry officer, apparently responded with - "Yes, if you're a low-down scoundrel, now's the time!" [3] There were no other responses. Apparently, the king smiled (allegedly, one of the only times his officers ever saw him do it) and said that "I knew that none of you would ever desert me." [4]

His parting words were - "Now, good luck, gentlemen; tomorrow at this time we will either have beaten the enemy, or we will never see each other again." [5]

They won the battle.

The remarkable thing is that the whole sequence of events apparently happened. The Parchwitz speech reads as though it was written for a film, and even allowing for errors in recollection and retrospective dramatizing, it probably was actually delivered that way. I mean, Friedrich II was a drama queen anyway; it wouldn't surprise me if Hollywood got its ideas from him.

1 = Wir müssen den Feind schlagen oder uns vor ihren Batterien alle begraben lassen.
2 = Ist einer oder der andere unter Ihnen, der nicht so denkt, der fordere hier auf der Stelle seinen Abschied. Ich werde ihm selbigen ohne den geringsten Vorwurf geben.
3 = Ja, das müßte ein infamer Hundsfott sein; nun wäre es Zeit!
4 = Ich habe vermuthet, daß mich keiner von Ihnen verlassen würde.
5 = Nun leben Sie wohl, meine Herren, morgen um diese Zeit haben wir den Feind geschlagen, oder wir sehen uns nie wieder.

All quotations from the University of Trier archive of works of Friedrich II, Werke Friedrichs der Großen, accessible online here. The account primarily uses Major von Kaltenborn's recollection as source, but also incorporates material from the king's page, Georg Karl zu Putlitz.
 
The Parchwitz speech reads as though it was written for a film
Or that he stole it from a play:

That he which hath no stomach to this fight,

Let him depart; his passport shall be made

And crowns for convoy put into his purse:

We would not die in that man's company

That fears his fellowship to die with us.
 
It was listed as one of the things that made the speech great:

At one point during the speech, the king used a rhetorical tactic unusual for him, saying, "If any one of you doesn't think [that you are up for the coming struggle], give us your farewells. I will do the same without the slightest reproach."
 
"Are you better off now, than you would be if you were poisoned?"

Bill Maher, (imagining Putin's reelection slogan)


PS:
I have no idea if this files here. I lost track of the quotes threads. This used to be simple...
 
Last edited:
"In [Australian musical performer Kirin J.] Callinan’s orbit, the distinctions between talent, irony, and genuine bad taste bleed together until they’re indistinguishable."
-Anna Gaca, in this article for Spin last year

(if you've been living under a rock for the past seven months, this is Callinan's most well-known piece)
 
In the winter of 1757, the second year of the Seven Years' War in Europe, Prussian military fortunes were at a low ebb. The coalition facing the Prussians was so massive that despite a colossal victory over the allies' western armies at Roßbach a month before, Friedrich II and his men were still horrifically outnumbered and facing a large enemy army deep in their home territory. Shortly before attacking the Austrian army at Leuthen, Friedrich II took the unusual - for him - step of addressing his officers in person to give a pep talk. Although there are many versions of what became known as the Parchwitz speech (for the name of the village in which it was given), most of the accounts agree on the tenor, if not the particulars. It went down in German military history as possibly the most inspiring and iconic example of military leadership in national history.

It's perhaps best known for the line, "We must beat the enemy, or let ourselves be buried in front of his [artillery] batteries." [1]

At one point during the speech, the king used a rhetorical tactic unusual for him, saying, "If any one of you doesn't think [that you are up for the coming struggle], give us your farewells. I will do the same without the slightest reproach." [2] Konstantin von Billerbeck, a field-grade infantry officer, apparently responded with - "Yes, if you're a low-down scoundrel, now's the time!" [3] There were no other responses. Apparently, the king smiled (allegedly, one of the only times his officers ever saw him do it) and said that "I knew that none of you would ever desert me." [4]

His parting words were - "Now, good luck, gentlemen; tomorrow at this time we will either have beaten the enemy, or we will never see each other again." [5]

They won the battle.

The remarkable thing is that the whole sequence of events apparently happened. The Parchwitz speech reads as though it was written for a film, and even allowing for errors in recollection and retrospective dramatizing, it probably was actually delivered that way. I mean, Friedrich II was a drama queen anyway; it wouldn't surprise me if Hollywood got its ideas from him.

1 = Wir müssen den Feind schlagen oder uns vor ihren Batterien alle begraben lassen.
2 = Ist einer oder der andere unter Ihnen, der nicht so denkt, der fordere hier auf der Stelle seinen Abschied. Ich werde ihm selbigen ohne den geringsten Vorwurf geben.
3 = Ja, das müßte ein infamer Hundsfott sein; nun wäre es Zeit!
4 = Ich habe vermuthet, daß mich keiner von Ihnen verlassen würde.
5 = Nun leben Sie wohl, meine Herren, morgen um diese Zeit haben wir den Feind geschlagen, oder wir sehen uns nie wieder.

All quotations from the University of Trier archive of works of Friedrich II, Werke Friedrichs der Großen, accessible online here. The account primarily uses Major von Kaltenborn's recollection as source, but also incorporates material from the king's page, Georg Karl zu Putlitz.

The bravery of those germans that day was instrumental in securing a good position for their offspring to murder 6 million jews. :jesus:
 
11 million people, you mean. :nono:
 
a "Right-Wing" piece at a time when the Soviets are accepting Armenian immigrants to the relevant Soviet Republic , circa 1947-49

"Godlessness, Atheism, Immorality, Robbery and perpetual spying on one another!

There is not a trace of our family sanctities left there. Having repudiated the idea of the existence of a God, the Bolshevik ignores every conception of family standards, every moral principle, every social order. Aram’s wife or watch equally can belong to Hagop, Ali, or Stalin. There is no conception of nationality. A Kurd, a Caucasian, a Georgian, or a Turk have the right to become your son-in-law when they wish it. They have the right to divorce the very next day."

(Hairenik Weekly, vol. 15, no. 12, May 13, 1948.)

got me almost laughing ; ı still tend to forget peoples can be so much alike and this is the exact kind of thing ı would be hearing if ı was living in the Turkey of 40s and the word Armenian inserted instead , where-ever applicable .


Spoiler :

is not explicitly related to that time of the year . Playing huge maps recently and ı might have to destroy 100 strong stacks a turn and between turns can be 5 or 10 minutes long . Took to reading books while waiting and this was a random choice . Written by an American /Armenian , offers "a view from the other side of the hill" but still randomly trawled off the web in 2015 . And can be tantalizing at times . Despite reading newspapers to the best of my ability during the times [meaning early 80s] , ı wasn't aware "Right-Wing" Armenians killed more Turkish diplomats than the "Left-Wing" Armenians , namely the ASALA . So , how did this work ? Boys of the CIA hoping to create a common point with the denizens of Erivan and the like , so that they could be induced to rebel at a convenient time at the whim of White House ? Or was it a selective campaign specifically targeting diplomats who would be ready to hint , if Ankara of the Old Republic felt too much threatened and made it available ? It being some weird idea that the foreign capital (the Turkish diplomat was assigned to) might not exactly like or love whatever lurked in the night , after the foreign capital joined the general crusade of the new kind that would see the seperatists starting their bid ? Evolutions made by the State Department crew , instead of those of the "station" in-situ , now that the Turkish Diplomats might have been aware of the Station crew and keep their guard up ? Isn't that still a fact that all Armenian terrorism stopped after the seperatist thing ? And all covered by the US State Department "diligently" working each April so the "word" would not be said , or accepted by the US Congress , so that the Turkish Diplomats would never be aware ?
 
So I was reading through Shimon Peres's last interview and he claimed to have said some pretty wild stuff to Putin:

I told him, “You’re 63 years old, I’m 93 years old. Tell me, what do you want to achieve in the coming 30 years? What are you fighting for? Are you hoping to piss off America?”

He says, “No.”

“America wants a piece of Russia? No. You have trouble discussing things with Obama?”

He says, “Why do you ask?

I said, “Look, I am not a spy, whatever, tell me.”

He says, “What do you think?”

And I said, “America will win no matter what you do.”

“Why?” he asked.

“Because they are lucky, and you are not.”

...

And then I told him: “You behave like a czar.”

I said, “What did the czars do? They developed two cities, St. Petersburg and Moscow, as a showcase. Whatever you want, you will find there. The rest of Russia is like Nigeria covered with snow. Your people are dying. You don’t give them life. You think they’ll forgive you?”

“Why is America great?” I asked him. “Because they were givers. Why is Europe in trouble? Because they are takers. America is giving; people think it’s because they are generous. I think it’s because they are wise. If you give, you create friends. The most beneficial investment is making friends.

“America had the guts to take the Marshall Plan, a huge piece of their GNP that they gave to this dying Europe. And in this way, they have shown that this is the best investment in the world.”
 
“Why is America great?” I asked him. “Because they were givers. Why is Europe in trouble? Because they are takers. America is giving; people think it’s because they are generous. I think it’s because they are wise. If you give, you create friends. The most beneficial investment is making friends.

“America had the guts to take the Marshall Plan, a huge piece of their GNP that they gave to this dying Europe. And in this way, they have shown that this is the best investment in the world.”

This is exactly correct (if a bit of a simplification). And it's why we suffer when we allow "takers" to determine our posture toward the rest of the world.
 
“Why is America great?” I asked him. “Because they were givers. Why is Europe in trouble? Because they are takers. America is giving; people think it’s because they are generous. I think it’s because they are wise. If you give, you create friends. The most beneficial investment is making friends.

“America had the guts to take the Marshall Plan, a huge piece of their GNP that they gave to this dying Europe. And in this way, they have shown that this is the best investment in the world.”
As they say, ‘lend a little and you have a debtor, lend a lot and you have a partner’.
 
"The goodness of money was as unmistakable as the goodness of health or beauty, and a glistening car, a title or a horde of servants was mixed up in people's minds with actual moral virtue."
--Eric Blair
Such, Such Were the Joys

DIscussing his childhood in the years before WWI
 
Better known as George Orwell, but yes, that is a very recognisably British sentiment.
 
7J0PjtE.png
 
I used to think Aristotle is overrated and his ethics unfortunate in modern times, but that quote is truly one of the Greatest Quotes of All Time.
Of All Time !!!
 
Of All Time !!!
"If I were Taylor Swift I would immediately release a song titled, 'Kanye West doesn’t care about black people'."
— Supriya Limaye
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom