How long should you date before you get married?

You should abosofreaking lootley date somebody for at least X before getting engaged.


  • Total voters
    132

downtown

Crafternoon Delight
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
19,541
Location
Chicago
For the purposes of this question, lets discuss the absolute min. time difference between starting dating, and becoming engaged. The length of the engagement can be variable. I know its different for every person blah blah blah, but do you think there is some sort of hard and fast rule?

Also, do you think cohabitation should be a prerequisite? Your thoughts!

Poll coming
 
Cohabitation is a must. You could end up living with someone with habits you simply can't put up with. And why not move in together? The only reason not to, is if you think you're going to break up anyway, but you are thinking about marriage anyway right :) Plus if you are going to drive each other crazy, better to do it when you don't need to think about a divorce.

And you should move in by the time you are engaged at the latest.

Voted: 6 months.
 
I think it really depends on the relationship. I know you don't want that as an answer, but for some people a few months is all that is needed to know, while others would take years. So - no hard and fast rule.

Personally I think for it to be in the few month category, co-habitation, or at least a ton of together time, is necessary. Not as a prerequisite, but as an indication of the strength of the relationship.

EDIT - basically what Pete said...
 
It all depends.

And this had better be hypothetical!
 
My parents got engaged after six months of exclusive dating. Seems to be a good enough time. I don't think cohabitation is necessary.
 
I wouldnt recommend cohabitation before being married. Apparently there have been studies done that show living together actually increases the odds of a couple getting a divorce after marriage. http://www.courierpress.com/news/2009/mar/01/cohabiting-couples-raise-divorce-odds/

Wow. Just Wow.

Here are some choice graphs for the CFC viewing pleasure:

Mobby's "study" said:
“Men and woman cohabitate for different reasons,” Mike McManus said in a conference call discussing the book. “Women see it as a step toward marriage. They think they can audition for this job. Men do it because they like to have the ready availability of sex and having someone share their living expenses. Women should heed their mother’s advice -- if you give away the milk, he won’t buy the cow.”

...

Couples who live together not only are significantly more likely to divorce after marriage, but about 45 percent of them will break up before marriage, studies show. Cohabitation, McManus said, has a high failure rate because it’s based on selfishness.

“’If you make me feel loved, then I might marry you. If you make me happy, then I might marry you,’” McManus said. “Love and marriage is an investment, and cohabitation is a gamble. Cohabitation is conditional; marriage is based on permanence. These are radically different psychological premises. True love is selfless -- seeking to serve the other person. Cohabitation is based on selfishness -- ‘How will this relationship satisfy me?’”

...

Women who cohabitate are more likely to be abused and to be depressed than women in a marriage...

...

“The major underlying reason for soaring cohabitation is that these are couples in which one or both partners grew up in a divorced home or in a home where there was not a marriage,” he said. “These young couples fear marriage because they fear divorce.”

You got any further info to back up this "study" other than a promotional pamphlet promoting a book/movie? Like the actual study, methodology, etc.?

EDIT: Since MobBoss ninja edited his post - here is the original "study" he linked to: http://www.fireproofmymarriage.com/dload.php?file=_images/_couples/LivingtogetherStatisticalRisk.pdf
 
My parents got engaged after six months of exclusive dating. Seems to be a good enough time.

I got engaged after 5 months (and married a little over a year later, so close to 2 years "meeting to marriage"). Working out good for me so far...
 
if you give away the milk, he won’t buy the cow.”

My ex-mother-in-law said that to my ex-wife while we were living together before getting married.

A better question to ask is why get married in the first place? Unless you are planning to have babies, it is likely going to cause far more problems than just living together until you decide to do so.
 
You got any further info to back up this "study" other than a promotional pamphlet promoting a book/movie? Like the actual study, methodology, etc.?

There are plenty of links that reference several studies done in this area. Here is a link that lists several: http://www.geocities.com/maggi19/sex/cohabitation.htm

In turn, I just need to ask....do you have any studies that show co-habitation before marriage is an actual benefit?

EDIT: Apparently, Formaldehyde is some anecdotal proof of the cohabitation point. And to be fair, I am anecdotal proof of the opposite: my wife and I lived togehter off and on a couple of times prior to getting married (a result of her dad trying to break us up a couple of times). Living together did cause some unintended problems down the road, but we got through that and other issues we had. We celebrate our 25th wedding anniversary next month. We probably have done about every single wrong thing there is to do in a marriage, but somehow its worked out ok. Have to give God the credit for that, not us.
 
Married 8 years here.

My parents dated for a mere 6 months (3 months dating, 3 month engagement) before tying the knot & it wasn't because of a pregnancy. They're still together although I'm not sure why.:confused:

I've known my wife since about age 13. In junior high & high school, she was too hot & popular for a geek like me. In college, she chased me, but I had other girls on my mind. We partied & studied together, but that's it. She moved out of state for a job after college. We stayed in touch (I helped her move & visited her once). Several years later, she moved back home for another job & we finally started dating. I proposed about a year & a half later & our engagement was 6 months while we planned the wedding, bought a house, etc.

I guess my point is that life works in very mysterious ways. If two people click at the right time in each of their lives', things can work out, but it's near impossible to predict. Often, the couple that looks perfect turns out to be a mess & the couple that looks like a mess lasts a lifetime.
 
I got engaged after 5 months (and married a little over a year later, so close to 2 years "meeting to marriage"). Working out good for me so far...

That's probably another important thing that matters - the time until the wedding. If you're engaged long enough the time until you get engaged shouldn't even matter.
 
There are plenty of links that reference several studies done in this area. Here is a link that lists several: http://www.geocities.com/maggi19/sex/cohabitation.htm

In turn, I just need to ask....do you have any studies that show co-habitation before marriage is an actual benefit?

EDIT: Apparently, Formaldehyde is some anecdotal proof of the cohabitation point. And to be fair, I am anecdotal proof of the opposite: my wife and I lived togehter off and on a couple of times prior to getting married (a result of her dad trying to break us up a couple of times). Living together did cause some unintended problems down the road, but we got through that and other issues we had. We celebrate our 25th wedding anniversary next month. We probably have done about every single wrong thing there is to do in a marriage, but somehow its worked out ok. Have to give God the credit for that, not us.

You would help your case a little if you took some time to find a less-biased source. Here is a study by the CDC that does seem to indicate a higher likelihood of divorce after cohabitation than no cohabitation: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf

And I am with you somewhat on the opposite anecdotal evidence. My wife and I lived together before marriage. We have only been married 4 years now, but are still going strong.

That's probably another important thing that matters - the time until the wedding. If you're engaged long enough the time until you get engaged shouldn't even matter.

Indeed. The time to getting engaged shouldn't be the metric to look at, but the time to marriage.
 
You would help your case a little if you took some time to find a less-biased source. Here is a study by the CDC that does seem to indicate a higher likelihood of divorce after cohabitation than no cohabitation: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf

I knew there were multiple studies and it was simply the first google pass. Nice find.

And I am with you somewhat on the opposite anecdotal evidence. My wife and I lived together before marriage. We have only been married 4 years now, but are still going strong.

Newbie. ;)
 
Sorry, I voted wrong. I meant to say "more than 2 years".

Take your time. I say at least 1 year after moving in together. Overall definitely more than 2 years.

But I'm not married, so don't take my opinion too highly.
 
You should date long enough to finalize the divorce from your previous marriage.
EPIC LOLZZ

You would help your case a little if you took some time to find a less-biased source. Here is a study by the CDC that does seem to indicate a higher likelihood of divorce after cohabitation than no cohabitation: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf

And I am with you somewhat on the opposite anecdotal evidence. My wife and I lived together before marriage. We have only been married 4 years now, but are still going strong.



Indeed. The time to getting engaged shouldn't be the metric to look at, but the time to marriage.
Okay, I'll take the CDC as a factual source. I'm convinced
 
Back
Top Bottom