Lexicus
Deity
What is "inhuman" about it?
What is human about treating the people in your life as means to an end? What is human about making it obvious that you're doing this by using corpo-speak and HR-type euphemisms in personal communications?
What is "inhuman" about it?
I'm looking for work at the moment and while I don't go as far as the suggestions, I have messaged some former colleagues and a former manager that I hadn't spoken to in a while. They've been really helpful.
My wife is also changing jobs and spoke to some peers and acquaintances about it, they helped her a lot too.
Are we bad people for using people?
The fact that people do have relationships with others for personal benefit, as well as the benefit of those others, makes it a very human trait. Most human relationships are a "means to an end" in one way or another. The article just demonstrates a more systematic way to think about one's work related relationships to find a better or more rewarding job. The process of systematizing things is also very human. Certainly, you may find it distasteful and badly utilitarian, but it is not abusive or inhuman. Some may find it a good way for organizing one's fellow workers to the benefit of the larger group!What is human about treating the people in your life as means to an end? What is human about making it obvious that you're doing this by using corpo-speak and HR-type euphemisms in personal communications?

Wonderful. What do you do for work?McGuire University taught me everything I need to know to get a job

It seems like your post was directed at me, so I went back and read page 1 of this thread (from 11 years ago) and found it worth visiting.It’s been what, seven years since he started doing this bit? I still don’t get it![]()
It seems like your post was directed at me, so I went back and read page 1 of this thread (from 11 years ago) and found it worth visiting.
So people know I'm referring to Trump. If you ever played super double dragon, there's a clown named McGuire and it's Trump
Employers who pay by the hour will track time spent because that is what they are paying for. Salaried folks are more likely compensated by results regardless of the hours actually spent. Contracted work is paid for based on completion of the tasks.Not sure why employers still think it's effective to track time spent rather than look at results.
Pretty sure that some of those cases mentioned are salaried workers.Employers who pay by the hour will track time spent because that is what they are paying for. Salaried folks are more likely compensated by results regardless of the hours actually spent. Contracted work is paid for based on completion of the tasks.
I don't see that from the article. Where?Pretty sure that some of those cases mentioned are salaried workers.