Humans - inherently racist?

LexaDoig.jpg

Looks white to me. Although after checking wiki, I can see she does have a filipino mother. But no, if people can refer to Obama as black(why is he never referred to as a mulatto anyway?), Lexa should certainly be referred to as white.

I prefer white girls(black or red hair, there are so many blonds around here it's almost tiresome), but I make an exception for that Asian cylon girl from Battlestar Galactica. Oh my god how good looking she is.
 
Pac Islanders should be considered Asian, so Lexa Doig should be considered half-Asian. And hot.

Rommie02.jpg


I make an exception for that Asian cylon girl from Battlestar Galactica. Oh my god how good looking she is.

Boomer, AKA Sharon Valerii, played by Grace Park?

cylon-boomer.jpg
grace_park_02.jpg


Yeah, I'd tap that. I mean, she has a gun and everything!
 
Looks white to me. Although after checking wiki, I can see she does have a filipino mother. But no, if people can refer to Obama as black(why is he never referred to as a mulatto anyway?), Lexa should certainly be referred to as white.

Calling Obama mulatto would probably raise some eyebrows in the US. Mixed-race / multiracial / multiethnic seems a lot more PC.
 
most white women like black men because they have much larger penises than white men (and even more larger than asians). The statement isn't racist btw. Many women have told me that penis size is the most important consideration for them for determining a boyfriend.
 
most white women like black men because they have much larger penises than white men (and even more larger than asians). The statement isn't racist btw. Many women have told me that penis size is the most important consideration for them for determining a boyfriend.

Just a point but how would she know, before having chosen him as a boyfriend? Or am I just old-fashioned and not in keeping with the trend of public penis displays?
 
most white women like black men because they have much larger penises than white men (and even more larger than asians). The statement isn't racist btw. Many women have told me that penis size is the most important consideration for them for determining a boyfriend.
Many men have told me that sexual fidelity on the part of the girl is the most important consideration for them for determining a girlfriend. So unless there is some trend of viagra-induced public-penis display going on in the states, then someone is out of luck...

But seriously, what you said is actually racist, in that it does not build on any valid data. Statistically speaking, penis sizes vary very little between the different races. The only possible thing that might be noted, is that a few studies seem to agree that Indian (from the sub-continent) men apparently have an average of 5 mm shorter penises. There are no statistical differences between any of the other races at all.

However, add to it that measuring the length and circumference of a penis is a really complicated task, in that most men are not able to hold a full erection while being measured, and even how and where to measure is difficult to agree upon, then the numbers become quite meaningless.
 
I seem to remember one study that implied that most size queens (at least those that focus on length instead of girth) could be clinically diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.


Studies on penis size do find larger averages among Africans than Europeans and among Europeans that Asians, but these are just averages and variation within the groups is more significant. Also, the French average was much closer to the African average than the European average, and higher than the average in some African countries if I recall correctly.
 
I seem to remember one study that implied that most size queens (at least those that focus on length instead of girth) could be clinically diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.


Studies on penis size do find larger averages among Africans than Europeans and among Europeans that Asians, but these are just averages and variation within the groups is more significant. Also, the French average was much closer to the African average than the European average, and higher than the average in some African countries if I recall correctly.
Which studies? I seriously question their scientific rigorousness.
 
why do people even care about penis sizes in different races?
dividing people into racial categories is silly.
It's a stereotype that developed because Negroes were considered to be more beast-like than Europeans, so their base strength, stamina and vitality were thought to be higher than for European men. That included penis-sizes.

The penis-size stereotype has survived while other racial ideas have been accepted as false. Probably because it's a positive stereotype and because it is harder to measure.

As to why anyone bothered to actually investigate the stereotype? We're men. We've always been disproportionately interested in our own penises - and secretly jealous of any man who's rumored to have a bigger one...
 
Unless we're satisfied with our own size...
 
The penis-size stereotype has survived while other racial ideas have been accepted as false. Probably because it's a positive stereotype and because it is harder to measure.

It's been proven true. I would link the website on this thread, but I would be infracted, so instead I will send it via PM.

Calling Obama mulatto would probably raise some eyebrows in the US. Mixed-race / multiracial / multiethnic seems a lot more PC.

I call people mulatto, and that raises eyebrows because a lot of people don't know what that means. Multiracial is what other people use normally. I don't think hardley anyone cares about PC.
 
It's been proven true. I would link the website on this thread, but I would be infracted, so instead I will send it via PM.

If your website is subject to scientific scrutiny and contains hard data (pun neither intended nor coincidental, but inevitable) I'm pretty sure you can link it.

Or is it just gay porn ?
 
Not really porn, no, I still don't think I should link it.

Also, gay men have penises larger by an average of .3 of an inch.

http://www.salon.com/health/sex/urge/world/1999/11/04/size

Did Kinsey researchers actually measure the arched staffs of their subjects?

"No," the Canadian admitted. "The subjects reported themselves, either by mailing their measurements in, or by reporting their size to an interviewer."

Come on !
As the stereotype goes gay men are more narcissistic than straight men, and the first thing guys lie about is their dick size.
 
I'm honest about everything or I don't answer.
 
That's a stereotype, not true.

http://buckmire.blogspot.com/2008/06/gay-boys-have-bigger-penises-than.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10410197

I found an article about black penises too.

"It is generally said that the penis of the Negro is very large," so
wrote German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795. "And
this assertion is so far borne out by the remarkable genitory
apparatus of an Ethiopian which I have in my anatomical collection."
Louis Jacolliet, a 19th century French writer who spent three decades
investigating penis size, had this to say: "In no branch of the human
race are the male organs more developed than in the African Negro."
Certainly, the belief in the well-endowment of the African race has an
extensive history. But is it justified by the facts?

Going strictly by the Kinsey data, which still remains one of the most
exhaustive studies on penis size to date, the average white male has a
penis measuring 6.2 inches long and 3.7 inches around, whereas the
average black male has a penis 6.3 by 3.8 inches, for a difference of
0.1 inches--not what you'd call statistically significant. When it
came to flaccid length, however, blacks fared a little better: 4.3
inches long, versus 4.0 inches for white males. So it may be,
therefore, that while those of African heritage appear larger
initially, under actual working conditions things tend to even out.
You should consider this a tentative hypothesis rather than a
scientific fact, as there were only 59 black respondents to the
survey, versus 2,500 for whites."

http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=366192
 
Uhmm, I got your link and I really doubt the scientific value...

The flaccid length I get if I think hard enough (pun not blablabla...) about evolution and climate.
 
Back
Top Bottom