Spot on.
Our ideological leanings lead us to the conclusion that freedom of speech is a good thing, but saying that freedom of speech is itself an ideology is nonsense.
These statements seem to contradict each other. Freedom of speech is part of an ideology so showing the cartoons to send the message that we value freedom of speech would be enforcing part of an ideology.
I dont know what hxstory books youre reading, but saying hxstory isnt patriarchal is like saying the earth doesnt gravitate around the sun. Western hxstory in particular is brimming with patriarchy and sexism. Look at the establishment of the United States of America, for instance. The stories of the Founding Fathers are written in our textbooks, they are portrayed extensively in television and film, and their faces are even plastered all over our money. But where are the Founding Mothers? Where are the womxn who made hxstory in America? Their stories are not told or readily found. Although the word hxstory itself may have started off as meaning learned or wise man and may not have been patriarchal, hxstory in its essence, in the way it is told, written, passed down, taught, and even thought, IS patriarchal. Hxstory is not dictated by how it is spelled. Ever since the first conquistadors sailed the ocean blue and claimed indigenous land as theirs, hxstory has been constructed and defined by who has the power to tell it and who has access to it. These people then decide who is excluded, whose existence, civilization, culture, and traditions are wiped out, denied, and pretty much ignored, from hxstory. And guess what? Most of the people who have written, dominated, and colonized the world with their hxstory are white men. Looks like someone needs a lesson on the coloniality of power!
It's like reading a fantasy book.I did a google search for "Hxstory" and found this (from 2013):
Ryika said:It's like reading a fantasy book.
NovaKart said:Well yeah western culture like most cultures is traditionally patriarchal but what's their point? Are they saying history shouldn't be taught? Or that equal time should be spent discussing Martha Washington and Abigail Addams as their husbands?
The assertion that historiography has been mostly dominated by racist and sexist perspectives is hardly fantastical.
It's like reading a fantasy book.
Well yeah western culture like most cultures is traditionally patriarchal but what's their point? Are they saying history shouldn't be taught? Or that equal time should be spent discussing Martha Washington and Abigail Addams as their husbands?
The assertion that historiography has been mostly dominated by racist and sexist perspectives is hardly fantastical.
They're saying that history should be taught in a way that incorporates the perspectives of people who have typically been ignored and oppressed.
It really isn't all that big a deal.
I dont know what hxstory books youre reading, but saying hxstory isnt patriarchal is like saying the earth doesnt gravitate around the sun. Western hxstory in particular is brimming with patriarchy and sexism.
This does not even come close to summing up what is written in the text. You can't just pick the somewhat reasonable parts and then act as if the rest didn't exist.that historiography has been mostly dominated by racist and sexist perspectives
What scares me is that while we laugh at this now, in 30 years these college students will be the professors.
This is what she was replying to:
![]()
Anonymous asks: What does the x in hxstory represent?
Hi anon, thank you for asking this question! Ive only recently begun to spell hxstory with an x and womxn with an x. I used to spell each word with a y which signifies, Im sure you know, how hxstory is often thought and taught in such sexist, patriarchal terms. The y was meant to be an inclusive, progressive term that not only sheds light on the prejudice, discrimination, and institutional barriers womxn have faced, but to also show that womxn are not the extension of men (as hinted by the classic Bible story of Adam and Eve) but their own free and separate entities. The y was to promote female empowerment and liberation, but in reality, as I have learned recently, the terms hystory and womyn are not as inclusive or empowering as some feminists (mostly white liberals) make it out to be.
The usage of the y began at the Michigan Womyns Music Festival, a celebration of womyn-born-womyn and the contributions they have made to music and art. This is exactly the reason why I no longer wish to spell womxn with a y. This specific festival doesnt allow men or even trans-womxn to be a part of the event. Although I am all for a movement and a space that empowers womxn through music, the fact that they do not let trans-womxn attend shows how a lot of feminist movements have chosen to ignore the many struggles, identities, and intersectionalities of what it means to not only be born as a womxn, but to identify as a womxn. The y does not account for marginalized womxn groups or the many other feminist movements that have occurred throughout hxstory, such as third world feminist movements. In short, the y is a very white liberal way to look at feminism. It excludes womxn of color, trans-womxn, and other folks who may identity as womxn from the conversation and the movement.
I first saw the spelling of hxstory and womxn on a Tumblr post. Although I do not remember the post or the author (Sorry!), she wrote that she preferred to spell hxstory and womxn with an x because not only is it less transphobic and less racist, but because the x can represent anything really. Whether you identify as a womxn-born-womxn, trans-womxn, or a womxn of color, the ambiguity of the x stands for the many different identities, struggles, and movements womxn have been a part of and have overcome. All-in-all, its a more inclusive and more progressive term (at least to me anyway).