Is this thread about men in sparkly uniforms, or about women being used as sex symbols instead of the professional soldiers they are supposed to be?
If some army thinks that bright colors excudes professionalism because of some previous tradition, that's their business. It is not discrimination according to sex. Stop changing the topic.
And we come back to how you can conclude that the women are being used as sex symbols, which you still haven't explained. The uniforms are not particularly form fitting, they aren't wearing miniskirts, and shiny boots, while possessing some unfortunate implications, are included in many uniforms, mostly male. They are also quite common in fetish gear aimed at women. So, can we conclude that the male dress uniforms of the Russian Federation prove that Russian men are being used as sex symbols instead of the professional soldiers they are supposed to be?
Or is it your point that any clothing that does not entirely obscure the female shape somehow making women sex symbols? That seems a little Saudi Arabian to me. Do you also have anything against male uniforms that fail to obscure the shape of the male body?