Neither side had a clear manifesto.
No manifesto was required. It is not as if there was a party standing for an election and to become the government.
The brexiteer claim of an extra £350 million a week to the NHS has been disowned by most Brexiteers.
While those Remainers who argued that a Leave vote would result in an immediate
economic collapse are unapologetic and are not denounced by the other Remainers.
Many Brexiteers do think that we should have a soft brexit and they voted for that.
No, they did not. There were only two, or at most; if one prefers three choices.
People voted to:
Leave or
Remain or
did not bother to vote.
It is clear to me that many parliamentarians are attempting to re-interpret that vote into soft or hard Brexit, and then half heartedly
have Theresa May ask the EU for a very favourable soft exit that they know full well that the EU will not grant so that they can then
pave the way towards saying that as the Brexiters cannot get a good soft exit, the UK should defer exiting and then defer again,
and then claim that so much time has elapsed since the referendum that it is time expired and invalid and can be ignored.
Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn can see right through that tactic which is Theresa May is resisting such sabotage and
Jeremy Corbyn is letting his opponents in the Labour party go down that rabbit hole.
The vote was 17,410,742 leave to 16,141,241 remain, a 1,269,501 (1.8%) majority. TheThree Brexiteers have still not decided what they want. When they do decide it is probable that 640,000 people will regret their vote which would have produced a majority to remain.
Some people may regret their vote; that is usually the case.
But your arithmetic assumes that it is only those who voted Leave who will have regrets.
I suspect that as many, or more of those, who voted Remain out of fear after the scare
tactics from those in authority may now be wondering what the panic was really about.
If we had had a Referendum in the UK before joining or upgrading from EEC/EC to EU,
it would instead have likely been 70-75% No to 25-30% Yes.
The continental pro Europeans knew that so they presented the UK (and other member's states)
with what they thought was a Hobson's choice in two stages (Maastrict and Lisbon); upgrade to EU
or be on your own as there will be no EEC any more. And both John Major and Tony Blair fell for it.
The UK electorate were denied a referendum at each stage and in totality.
The pro EU elite only obtained an artificially high value of 48% for the EU by first taking us in
without our permisson, and secondly claiming that Leaving would create disastrous uncertainty.
I am therefore unimpressed with arguments about the narrowness of the gap between Remain
and Leave as the circumstances by which that narrowness was obtained were fundamentally undemocratic.
The resultant uncertainty now is therefore the fault of those pro EU UK politicians who
knowingly chose to act against the wishes of the majority of the UK population.