Is necrophilic bestiality wrong?

[Mise]

Inspired by the gay thread...

Technically, bestiality is defined as having sex with a live animal, and necrophilia as having sex with a dead human. This, however, leaves open the legal possibility of having sex with a dead animal. It's legal, but do you believe that it is wrong?

There are many issues at play here. Do animal rights apply to dead animals? Does sanctity of the corpse apply to animals at all? What's the conceptual difference between having sex with an animal, and eating one? Is it purely because it is icky? (because if it is, you really have no right to say that homosexuality is not wrong, if someone finds it icky)

 

[El_Machinae]

I eat dead animals, and then incorporate their proteins into my emmissions.

That'll teach 'em.

 

[GenMarshall]

Does this have to do with the pun "People just like to wack the dead horse a couple of times"?

Anywho, Necrophilic beastiality is just plain wrong. No explanation needed except that its disgusting to be making out with a corpse, epsecialy if the corpse is NOT the member of the same speaces. .

I suspect this thread would close in 5.... ...4.... ....3..... .....2.....

 

[Perfection]

Does the usage of leather sexual aids count?

 

[El_Machinae]

epsecialy if the corpse is NOT the member of the same speaces.

I have trouble figuring out how it's MORE wrong. They're both so high on the 'ew!' scale that I cannot differentiate.

 

[Xanikk999]

Im not saying its wrong but dont tell me about it or get near me after you do it!

 

[Chandrasekhar]

Not as bad as doing it with a dead, male, newborn animal, I think. Did I miss any taboos?

 

[Mise]

I have trouble figuring out how it's MORE wrong. They're both so high on the 'ew!' scale that I cannot differentiate.

People do all sorts of things to animals. They pump them with drugs, lock them in cages, force them to breed, then slaughter them by the millions. I don't see how penetrating an animal that died of natural causes is possibly worse than all that.

 

[Mise]

Not as bad as doing it with a dead, male, newborn animal, I think. Did I miss any taboos?

Against its will perhaps? Chained to your bedposts? Anally?

 

[El_Machinae]

People do all sorts of things to animals. They pump them with drugs, lock them in cages, force them to breed, then slaughter them by the millions. I don't see how penetrating an animal that died of natural causes is possibly worse than all that.

I meant "more wrong that doing a dead human".

I guess that the desire to do such a thing might not be wrong, in itself, but it might be indicative of other personality traits that should be attended to.

 

[MobBoss]

I dont think this is as legal as you think it is. Indecent and lewd act charges come to mind.

 

[Mise]

I meant "more wrong that doing a dead human".

I guess that the desire to do such a thing might not be wrong, in itself, but it might be indicative of other personality traits that should be attended to.

In all seriousness, I agree, but I think I'd prefer they stuck with dead animals than fulfilling their fantasies on live humans...

I dont think this is as legal as you think it is. Indecent and lewd act charges come to mind.

Good point. FWIW I doubt there's a court in the world that wouldn't find the offender guilty of something.

 

[SS-18 ICBM]

I believe that this question does not need to be asked. Would you like to engage in necrophilic bestiality?

 

[Perfection]

I believe that this question does not need to be asked. Would you like to engage in necrophilic bestiality?

Any one person's sexuality is not at issue. I'm sure that someone out there would like to engage in such activity.

 

[IglooDame]

I have trouble figuring out how it's MORE wrong. They're both so high on the 'ew!' scale that I cannot differentiate.

Just because you're squicked out doesn't mean it's wrong.

 

[IglooDame]

Any one person's sexuality is not at issue. I'm sure that someone out there would like to engage in such activity.

Heck, there's probably a website devoted to it already.

 

[SS-18 ICBM]

Any one person's sexuality is not at issue. I'm sure that someone out there would like to engage in such activity.

Someone, not everyone. Then a lot of people must consider it wrong.

 

[Masquerouge]

No, I don't see that as wrong.

 

[SS-18 ICBM]

It is also unhygienic.

 

[Xanikk999]

It is also unhygienic.

Well so is sex i suppose...

Why not just take a shower afterwards?

However i still think its gross. However i dont think its morally wrong.