SeleucusNicator said:The Turkish government is currently run by a Muslim party, so I don't know where you're getting this idea of secularity. In the past, when Muslim parties have been elected, they always made sure to remain secular, because if they didn't, the military would remove them from power. In this way, Turkey stayed secular and democratic while surrounding countries descended into theocracy and despotism. Now, EU demands have taken that ability from the military, and if an extremist party gets elected, nothing is stopping them.
Ironically, the EU, secularism incarnate, may have contributed to the creation of yet another fundamentalist state in the future.
RealGoober said:I am not European (well, all my ancestors were!), so i haven't been following the issue a whole bunch, but Europeans must know that there are consequences to this. This is a Muslim nation, and some nations, like the Netherlands, are having troubles with muslim Extremists. Europeans must ask themselves what are the benefits to Turkey being part of the EU.
But, like i said, I am not European. IMO, Turkey should be let in, provided that they improve their Human Rights record, especially about the Kurds. I voted hard to Say.
Stapel said:Half of the Muslim immigrants here in NL (originally) come from Turkey, the other half comes from Morocco. 99% of the extremists cas be find in the Moroccon (Arab) part.
Apart from that, Turkey is not a Muslim nation, it's a nation with many Muslims. I've been there twice and I know quite some Turkish immigrants here. The whole idea of Turkey as a Muslim nation seems a bit far-fetched to me.
Iggy said:It will take a very long time for the Turks to be happy to join the EU. Amongst all the things they have to do to get thier house in order is they have to recognise the Greek Cypriot government (a current EU member). That will not be popular with Turkish voters.
Marla_Singer said:I would have liked better to see Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia joining the EU instead of Turkey. Culturally speaking, Maghreeb countries are a lot more closer to France than is Turkey. Moreover, they are Arab, which is even better as I've understood that putting Turkey in was simply a marketing advertisement to prove Europe was not racist. There's no border issues in Maghreeb as there are in Turkey. And finally, there are less people in those 3 countries together than in Turkey only. In 2050, there will be 110 million Turks and 70 million Germans.
However, the EU Parliament has decided. And obviously the supporters of Turkey in the EU were very proud and happy of their vote. So I guess they know what they are doing.
Stapel said:Marla,
Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia are totally backward! Neither of them have Free Press, nor a mature democracy! Turkey has both!
They're only closer to France, due to history and language.
As we can see quite clearly here in NL, there is quite a difference between Turkish and Moroccon immigrants.
Oh, most are Muslim. Yet, The average American is more Christian than the average Turk is muslim.RealGoober said:Interesting. I was under the impression that Turkey was quite a strongly muslim state, that everybody but a few minorities were Muslim, and it was quite non-secular.
It has to do with labour and with fear I guess.I must be mistaken. Apparently I know little about Turkey. So, if the extremists come from Morocco mainly, then why the clause about limiting the number of Turkish Muslims allowed to go into the rest of the EU, if Turkey is let in? or is that to limit the number of people flooding the other countries, looking for work?
Steph said:Tunisia isn't that backward! The press isn't really free, and the democracy is dubious, in the sense of the Presidential "election", but beside that they are relatively close to use.