Verarde
Pondering Wearing A Hat
Particularly thinking of Verarde
Thanks mate. I appreciate that.
I did enjoy the game, particularly playing as Zaalbar.
Rhauanouaa hauuioo rooouaahoaoaa huaaurouaa raaauowouuw roaao rriauaaawoioiau.
Particularly thinking of Verarde
The point was that Bounty hunters were meant to gang up on people, and/or act defensively as well.
askthepizzaguy said:spaceman98 said:Yes. I am quite surprised that the town decided to lynch me. A survivor neutral wants the town to win since many more people survive from that than a scum win, right? I agree that neutrals sould probably make an effort to work together and will vote in support if required.askthepizzaguy said:Actually I know of several still alive.spaceman98 said:I have already roleclaimed in thread and yes, support would be nice. What other info would you like about me?askthepizzaguy said:Hello
The word may or may not be out, but I'm actually neutral and I'm looking for other neutrals.
I note that you're on the chopping block for today. Do you want my vote support?
I'd be willing to vote whichever way. The price is simply a claim, no charge this time.
My actions? I have been placing some bounties, on lurkers mostly, however you guys killed off all the bounty hunters, so my money, ability and goal are pretty much going down the drain.
All I really want to know is whether or not you'd be willing to support a pro-neutral stance.
It sounds like you would. We're just looking to make certain no claimed neutrals die by the lynch unless it can be proven that they're mafia. Simple simple, logical, reasonable, and shouldn't offend you regardless of your alignment, be it town, neutral, or scum.
The time may come when I ask you for a similar voting favor to save one of us. After that favor is repaid, you're free to vote whoever.
Fair deal? If so, I vote in your favor today.
I think you're dead and proven scum. That's a shame; was looking forward to working with you.
Looking at it again, I now realize I don't need to worry about the stats.
I'm not completely sure, because a couple roles like BL and Mat I can't tell if they're townies or neutrals, but I count 20 townies, 10 neutrals, and 10 mafia.
Perhaps I should re-think my "more than half the players must be townie" rule, if a game that the town won as easily this doesn't count under it.
I suppose I could go "More than half must be townie, or at least neutrals that can't kill people" or place an upper limit on the allowed number of mafia/SK type roles or something.
I have to ask, during the actual stealing portion did you suspect it was me, or did you only figure it out once the game ended?
You tactic to bury the money in the noticeboard was quite brilliant, though I wasn't entirely certain if that meant you no longer 'owned' the money. I assumed that it meant that you didn't, and since I had access to the board whenever you pulled the money back I'd just rescan and re-steal from you.
By that point I think I was aware that Buddhafish also had a good chunk of change laying around but given the environment I was in at the time didn't want to risk him finding out about me doing the stealing, so I figured I'd only steal from him if I absolutely had to.
By the way, I dissagree with the claim that the town was overreliant on cops. The town was like that at first, but they quickly gave up on the idea.
Why not? Because of Night of the Mindworms or something?although ironically Earthling never trusted him
Just want to point out that if the opposing mafia hadn't been inactive and the folks that were neutral stayed on side, the mafia would have owned the vote, and the end result would have been the same as certain other games the mafia gained control of the vote in.
Therefore not a "bad" performance by "the mafia", simply fell short with a strategy that was about to win, which failed largely due to non-coordination.
Town was about to become a helpless minority in a very big way.
Game became boring because the other mafia had no teeth/went inactive and the neutrals became uninteresting and helpless after the stronger mafia went.
Edit: Of course it was easy to pick out the mafia after my lynch. Had they all showed up and stood together, that would have been all she wrote for the town. Simply taking attendance would have won, but since they didn't all show, didn't all stand together, they were outed. Push failed, that was the risk. Wasn't in any way dumb, has been proven to win in situations where it's actually employed.
my list said:Inner Circle
2. choxorn Mason Zack's Partner
10. BSmith1068 jedi roleblocker
13. Beefy town tracker
24. Mergle Jedi Scanner
36. Earthling Jedi Race Scanner
19. Jarrema Mical, the Disciple killed Night Three, revivied
Town/Likely Town
11. Verarde wookie
16. dcmort93 Jarema vouching for him
28. The Black Knigh Revivied Jarrema
Neutral - Safeish
6. Buddhafish Dark side Neutral Criminal
39. Winston Hughes Hutt Neutral Criminal
Neutral - Unknown
31. JoanK blocked N3 Claimed Bounty Hunter
15. topsecret darkside
Most Likely Scum
17. askthepizzaguy light saber scanner
14. classical_hero blocked N7 darkside
23. Optical DaveShack bis Blocked N8 voting against ATPG
38. robbiecon SamSniped bis Darth Traya?
Unknown
18. Double A
29. Gone 3 the Celt
32. Xenoneb Droid
4. mechaerik voting against ATPG
7. Backwards Logic scanned Grey
8. JHT
9. Dreadnought Droid voting against ATPG
We had 10 Jedi, 9 Republic, the Exile, 5 Revanchists, 5 Triumvirate, 7 bounty hunters and 3 neutrals. The Triumvirate cover roles should have been better and maybe Juhani should have flipped Mafia as well as Belaya, but hey.
Why not?
Huh?Inexplicably lied to us or misled us on what you discussed with johnhughthom, after johnhughthom died. Particularly the couple of posts that I quoted from jht about a quicktopic discussion (that choxorn said he didn't know about either); I can look up again.
Yeah, that was just a brain fart on my part, and it would have looked really bad to retract that statement.I also noticed that you had claimed you had been scanned in public when it was choxorn who Mergle scanned.
Thanks!Mostly, though, it's that I would give you credit for taking advantage of a strong cover role and playing well as scum.
I've bussed countless teammates; I don't see why I would have treated ATPG any differently. Although I think you're giving me too much credit for my suspicions of ATPG after Kennigit's death, that wasn't a very strong indicator of guilt IMO. I thought it was pretty clear that Pizza was a scumbag the round before he was lynched, although that was a while after I died.If the hosts post the night action logs, I did scan you the night you died just to check what I'd get on the role; I'd only let like Mergle know that was my action for that night at the time.
That all said, we all knew you were like the first person accusing askthepizzaguy because of Kennigit's death, so I don't think your role converting to the scum team by later in the game would have easily gotten away if you suddenly reversed your opinions for no reason and decided you were friends with them. Now if choxorn had been murdered like at the start of the game who knows how that would have ended up. As it was you did help the town a lot and bit the bullet for it in the end.
I can scan for alignment, or roleblock and protect the same target. Night one I scanned NinjaCow, due to Visor's claim, and got the message he was killed before I could scan. I hinted at this, in an unrelated QT, before the write up and Zack seemed unsurprised. Now this was in no way conclusive evidence of scummitude, but coupled with his odd behaviour seemed enough for pressure and scanning.
I didn't say sooner, because it only struck me now. It was Zack's post describing my character as a 'paranoid bastard' that made me think. My role struck me as odd the moment I got it, when I read I can also scan it surprised me, came across as an afterthought.
My reasoning behind that has already been explained, when I hinted at NinjaCow's death in a QT, you didn't act surprised. It was a pressure vote more than anything, I expected to take it off when a better target came along. In the end there was no need to unvote.