Lord Scott Walker can take on ISIS

God I hate him. He is a classic politician in that he literally will answer no questions, which to me means he is dishonest at best and just too stupid to have actual stances at worst.
 
:lol:

Carrying on the grand Republican tradition. Walk softly and carry a big gun, then limp away after blowing your own feet off with it. What an idiot.
 
So, because he "handled" union protesters, Scott Walker can take on ISIS:

http://time.com/3725078/scott-walker-unions-isis/


But the real question is, can he handle protesting teacher armed with rocket launchers?

“Let me be perfectly clear,” Walker told CNN after the speech. “I’m just pointing out the closest thing I have to handling a difficult situation, was the 100,000 protesters I had to deal with. There’s no analogy between the two other than difficult situation.”

Heh, I wasn't sure who the Republican front runner was until I started seeing all these Scott Walker threads popping up.
Thanks. :thumbsup:

Some more goodness from CPAC 2015!

 
If you have to do damage control after every speech because you said things that can hardly help but generate ridicule, you must be a Republican presidential candidate.
 
I find it hilarious that liberals can turn "I don't know" into the most evil possible response to a question.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...6e738a-bba8-11e4-bdfa-b8e8f594e6ee_story.html
Scott Walker’s insidious agnosticism

By Dana Milbank Opinion writer February 23


“I don’t know.”

Thus proclaimed Scott Walker, the Wisconsin governor and Republican presidential hopeful, when asked by The Post’s Dan Balz and Robert Costa on Saturday whether President Obama is a Christian.

This is not a matter of conjecture. The correct answer is yes: Obama is Christian, and he frequently speaks about it in public. Balz and Costa presented Walker with this information to give him a second chance to answer.

But even when prompted with the facts, Walker — in Washington for the National Governors Association meeting — persisted, saying, “I’ve actually never talked about it or I haven’t read about that,” and, “I’ve never asked him that,” and, “You’ve asked me to make statements about people that I haven’t had a conversation with about that.”

This is an intriguing standard. I’ve never had a conversation with Walker about whether he’s a cannibal, a eunuch, a sleeper cell for the Islamic State, a sufferer of irritable bowel syndrome or a grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. By Walker’s logic, it would be fair for me to let stand the possibility that he just might be any of those — simply because I have no personal and direct refutation from him.

Walker justifies his agnosticism on grounds that he is avoiding gotcha questions. He caused a furor when he used the same logic last week to avoid saying whether Obama loves his country after Rudy Giuliani, at a dinner with Walker, volunteered his view that Obama does not. “To me, this is a classic example of why people hate Washington and, increasingly, they dislike the press,” he told my colleagues Balz and Costa, two of the best in the business.

This is insidious, and goes beyond last week’s questioning of Obama’s patriotism, because it allows Walker to wink and nod at the far-right fringe where people really believe that Obama is a Muslim from Kenya who hates America. The governor is flirting with a significant segment of the Republican primary electorate: those who have peddled the notion (accepted by 17 percent of Americans at the end of Obama’s first term) that Obama is a Muslim.

Beyond that, Walker’s technique shuts down all debate, because there’s no way to have a constructive argument once you’ve disqualified your opponent as unpatriotic, un-Christian and anti-American. On the Internet, Godwin’s Law indicates that any reasonable discussion ceases when the Nazi accusations come out; Walker is essentially doing the same by refusing to grant his opponent legitimacy as an American and a Christian.

Phew!
I had no idea you had be a Christian to be legitimate in the US.

"I don't know the answer to your question" and "the press sucks" really riles up reporters, that's for sure.


We're going to need some more Scott Walker hate to keep this thread going.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/dangerous-candidacy-scott-walker
Let’s stipulate up front that Scott Walker, the governor of Wisconsin, is an odious politician whose ascension to the Presidency would be a disaster.
A fair and balanced opening paragraph.

I'm all ears if people want to elaborate on why they hate Governor Scott Walker so much.
 
No matter how you spin it, this comes down to "I said something that could be taken as "striking public employees are comparable to terrorists that behead people and I can handle either one" and when he got called on it the best he could fade to was "okay, I'm clueless". If someone really presses him he will have to tell the truth and say "I have no idea. If elected I'll just have Dick Cheney tell me what to do. That worked out great for the last guy, right?"
 
Get used to poking fun. You might have eight more years to do it. I would put Walker at the top of the candidate pile, including all Democrats.

J
 
I'm of the opinion that the protestors shook him up a little bit more than most protestors would.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ling-note-someone-sent-to-scott-walkers-wife/

Spoiler :
But if you thought the rhetoric aimed at Walker during the 2011 protests was bad, just wait until you hear his version of events included in his upcoming book, “Unintimidated: A Governor’s Story and a Nation’s Challenge” — particularly the chilling note that was sent to his wife.

State Patrol Capt. Dave Erwin, a former United States Marine, brought the governor a particularly eerie piece of hate mail during the protests that contained very specific information about his wife and children.

“[A]s I prepared to go out to the conference room for my daily press briefing, Dave came into my office and shut the door,” Walker recalls, according to a book excerpt published online.

“Sir, I don’t show you most of these, but I thought you ought to see this one,” the officer said.

The letter was addressed to Walker’s wife, Tonette. It read:

Has Wisconsin ever had a governor assassinated? Scotts heading that way. Or maybe one of your sons getting killed would hurt him more. I want him to feel the pain. I already follow them when they went to school in Wauwatosa, so it won’t be too hard to find them in Mad. Town. Big change from that house by [BLANK] Ave. to what you got now. Just let him know that it’s not right to [EXPLETIVE] over all those people. Or maybe I could find one of the Tarantinos [Tonette’s parents] back here.

Walker eventually told his wife about the threats — but only after some time had passed.

Erwin worked tirelessly to ensure Walker’s safety, the book notes. And it wasn’t just for him: Walker’s entire family was apparently being stalked.

“Governor, I’ve been at this awhile, and when the hairs stand up on the back of my neck, you have to be concerned,” the former Marine told Walker. “They know where you go to church; they’ve been to your church. They’re following your children and tracking your children. They know where your children go to school, what time they have class, what time they get out of class.”

“They know when they had football practice. They know where your wife works, they know that she was at the grocery store at this time, they know that she went to visit her father at his residence,” he said.

The size of Walker’s security detail was eventually increased
and troopers had to be assigned to monitor his children at school.

During the protest, demonstrators left ghastly messages for the governor.

“The Wisconsin State Capitol had taken on an eerie quiet by late Friday. … The chalk outlines around fake dead bodies etched with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s name remained in dismembered parts, not yet completely washed away by hoses,” Time magazine reported in 2011.
..
Protesters at one point even physically blocked Walker and his entourage from leaving a manufacturing company in La Crosse, Wis.

“As we prepared to leave, the state troopers saw that the protesters had physically blocked the entrance we had used to come onto the property. So they turned the squad car around and headed toward the other exit. We watched in disbelief as the throng of people rushed toward the second exit to block our path. As we tried to pull out, they surrounded the car and began beating on the windows and rocking the vehicle,” Walker writes in the book.

“Just as we extricated ourselves from their grip, a truck pulled up and blocked our path, playing a game of chicken with the troopers. They turned the lights and sirens on and warned him to get out of way. Eventually he backed up, and we sped off.

“It was a lesson in how much our circumstance had changed in a matter of a few days. We were dealing with people who were so blinded by their anger that they were not in the least bit afraid to storm and shake a police car. We had never seen anything like it in Wisconsin before,” he adds.


Just because some of them scared the governor doesn't make them terrorists.

I'll agree it was a mistake to use them in any comparison to ISIS.
Since it was said at CPAC, it would be a smaller mistake than if said during a debate.
 
Get used to poking fun. You might have eight more years to do it. I would put Walker at the top of the candidate pile, including all Democrats.

J

If this is indicative of his abilities as a campaigner he's toast. Can't make a speech to a friendly crowd without saying something stupid makes for a long trail.
 
The only thing any of these people have in the way of charisma is confidence. It's painful to listen to.
 
After the speech a Walker spokesperson said he in no way intended to compare Americans to ISIS.

“Governor Walker believes our fight against ISIS is one of the most important issues our country faces,” said his political action committee communications director Kirsten Kukowski. “He was in no way comparing any American citizen to ISIS. What the governor was saying was when faced with adversity he chooses strength and leadership. Those are the qualities we need to fix the leadership void this White House has created.”

“Let me be perfectly clear,” Walker told CNN after the speech. “I’m just pointing out the closest thing I have to handling a difficult situation, was the 100,000 protesters I had to deal with. There’s no analogy between the two other than difficult situation.”

Well the democrats are Terrorist, with there giving "healthcare" and "funding DHS" and "science" :mad: And Walker proceeds to shot himself in the other foot. :lol:
 
Im putting Hillary at the top of the "candidate pile" because... well, polls, math, statistics, research, that sort of thing... you know science.

Let us not forget experience. Secretary of State may not be the same as President, but it provides exposure to something more than striking public employees. Walker may as well have endorsed her.
 
Republican primary in 2012 was a last-man-standing affair. Kind of like this, only with less... you know;):


30-Man-Royal-Rumble-Match.jpg



So Walker is in bad shape if hes already on the apron:lol:
 
I mean I knew he didnt mean the protestors were like ISIS, but is he really so stupid as to not realize that "handling" 100,000 peaceful protestors is not preparation for anything?
 
Back
Top Bottom