I tried to find the story in sites i knew the names of, it seems they don't carry it so here is this link for it: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/...s-for-not-seeking-immunizations-for-baby-son/
A pic of that note:
Well, it seems even nurses have authority in the US, which i suppose means they are empowered.
Too bad it comes at the expence of the public.
In regards to the child's fever:
So i suppose 101 is a tiny bit over 38 Celcius, which is a fever, but not a life-threatening one, so it cannot be argued that the child's state could have caused such a reaction out of worry...
EDIT: To make the OP a bit clearer in regards to how the story was seen by myself:
Is it a good idea in your view that a nurse mocks the people who pay to use the hospital that pays her salary so that she can keep on being a moron? :/
EDITII: added the hospital's announcement of apology to the quoted part of the article.
maherads.com said:Trevor and Katie Smart brought the boy Monday evening to Palmetto Health Children’s Hospital after he was injured while pulling himself up to walk.
When the baby was examined, medical personnel found that he had a 101-degree fever and doctors wrote him a prescription and ordered an X-ray.
Then a nurse came into the emergency room and left a note on the table that referenced their room number.
“Need to tx, fever, 0 immunizations, Loser!” the note read, along with a frown-faced caricature.
[...]
“The behavior of our team member in this situation does not reflect Palmetto Health’s standards of behavior, and we sincerely apologize for what happened,” said Tammie Epps, spokesperson for Palmetto Health, in an email statement.
A pic of that note:

Well, it seems even nurses have authority in the US, which i suppose means they are empowered.
Too bad it comes at the expence of the public.
In regards to the child's fever:
http://www.webmd.com/first-aid/body-temperature said:In most adults, an oral temperature above 100F (37.8C) or a rectal or ear temperature above 101F (38.3C) is considered a fever. A child has a fever when his or her rectal temperature is 100.4F (38C) or higher.
So i suppose 101 is a tiny bit over 38 Celcius, which is a fever, but not a life-threatening one, so it cannot be argued that the child's state could have caused such a reaction out of worry...
EDIT: To make the OP a bit clearer in regards to how the story was seen by myself:
Is it a good idea in your view that a nurse mocks the people who pay to use the hospital that pays her salary so that she can keep on being a moron? :/
EDITII: added the hospital's announcement of apology to the quoted part of the article.