The best we can hope for is Dido if the leak is true.
Yas queen.
The best we can hope for is Dido if the leak is true.
I'm pretty sure that captured unique districts and buildings convert to the standard version that they replace when captured.Okay, I had bits highlighted to quote a while ago, seem to have lost them. Anyway....
They look like a lot of fun!
As for captured amphitheaters, what happens when you capture a British museum? I'm under the impression that all six relic slots remain. So maybe the same thing happens when Maori capture an amphitheater - the slots and any great works in them remain.
It's not.
AND can build forts that heal it. Yes, it's ridiculous.A warrior with 45 effective strength? Holy ****. Definitely way too much.
A warrior with 45 effective strength? Holy ****. Definitely way too much.
A warrior with 45 effective strength? Holy ****. Definitely way too much.
I don't think we really know that for certain.It's a stand alone melee unit like Samurai and Berserkers. It's not a warrior or a swordsman.
They Do come with a Warrior. So I really don't see this as a problem. Disembark Warrior first, then Settler on top. Then Link. I've seen the AI link their settlers very often, so I don't think it's something they'll be unable to do.
The best we can hope for is Dido if the leak is true. At least we still have Wilhelmina.
Love the civ design overall. It does seem weird to me though, that the UU is so strong. Granted I'm no expert on Maori history, but there doesn't seem to be anything in their wikipedia page to suggest their military strength was comparable to Roman legions.
As for captured amphitheaters, what happens when you capture a British museum? I'm under the impression that all six relic slots remain. So maybe the same thing happens when Maori capture an amphitheater - the slots and any great works in them remain.
I would make it so that Norway can pillage without declaring war but they do get grievances for it.
I'm pretty sure that captured unique districts and buildings convert to the standard version that they replace when captured.
I don't think we really know that for certain.
But in any event, it functionally replaces Swordsmen, which are inferior and cost Iron; there will never be a reason to build one as Maori even if you can.
I understand not being able to harvest resources, and I agree that is a steep yet balancing penalty. However I don't understand why they can't have great writers? I mean, beyond just trying to balance the civ. Is there any cultural reason the Maori can't have great writers? Beyond the fact they never wrote anything before the arrival of europeans? But if that is the only reason that could apply to most Native Americans too right? But they are able to get great writers? Just a little confused.
I think you're probably right, but the absence of data is not really a confirmation. If I remember correctly, there have been occasions in the past where they neglected to specify that a unique unit replaced an existing unit, but it did.The description of the Black Army and Huzsar both explicitly said which units they replace. The Toa explicitly says classical era melee. Therefore, that's what it is. It's a classical era melee unit that doesn't replace anything.
I don't think it makes sense, it makes the other guy completely unable to defend himself unless he declares war and incurs the diplo penalty for just defending himself.This. It would fit into both history and the new Grievance system.