dommy, it's just that you never fail to deliver a new level of crazy to crazy threads.
The main point of faulty reasoning I saw was that Hebrew Geneaologies as I said sometimes skip generations. A second flaw I saw was that it assumes Uniformatarianism, and Creationist theory (Hypothesis, whatever you want to call it) depends upon this being false (Ironically, so does Evolution.)
Now, assuming stable population growth, his numbers may be right, I don't know how to check them. But obviously it didn't happen that way.
No, no, you've been very restrained. Your "God did it" quotient is dropping.I never actually said that the Biblical account was true, at least not in this thread I didn't.
This ignores, of course, that population growth wasn't really at all stable until, at the earliest, the 18th century.
No, no, you've been very restrained. Your "God did it" quotient is dropping.![]()
Science is important to the natural world; religion is important to people. If you believe in something harmless, you don't need equations to make you feel better about it.
You can't believe both.
Question to Evolutionists here, is it proven that humans evolved, or is it possible, in theory, that they did not?
As we have told you before, Dommy. The idea that all life evolved through natural selection is a well established and widely accepted fact. How, exactly, this fact went about is where the theory comes in.
Hmm... ok, I see where you're getting at.
Then again, life without death would be terrible. Just think of all the people who've died (and rightly deserved it) still being here.![]()