There's a lot of meat here for a real debate about the truth regarding human creation.
What Kruelgor has done is something no one has done before: Attempt to use logic and reason to prove that were must have been created, coincidentally, at around the time described in Abrahamic religions. As evidence, he has given us a graph which shows the population of earth has been increasing exponentially.
His main point seems to be twofold:
1. Our mere existence means he's already won the debate. He wins automatically.
2. If you mock him, or attempt to use science, he also wins. Science is full of theories, he only deals with wild assumptions.
We had several threads dedicated to proof of Creationism and talking about evolution science, but they were all big fat wastes of time. This one ends the debate, conclusively.
I would like to add something to the graph which is missing, which can only further prove the existence of the one true deity, the Great Stick Man. (GSM) Praise be upon him.
Since it's on a graph, it must be true. The debate is over. Surely you all realize the error of your ways now.
EDIT:
I can sense some of you are still skeptical, but this should convince even the most reasonable of you. The
Six Undeniable Facts.
FIRST FACT: There are stick men.
SECOND FACT: Stick men have not always existed, because the universe has a defined starting point.
THIRD FACT: There must have been a first stick man. He was the Great Stick Man.
FOURTH FACT: The next stick man was made to look like the first stick man, made in the Great Stick Man's image.
FIFTH FACT: Later, stick women came along. (They took longer to draw)
SIXTH FACT: The number of stick men/women have been increasing over time.
Therefore, the first stick man was the Great Stick Man. But who created the first, Great Stick Man? He must have always existed. If so, a thing can exist without being created. What if the Great Stick Man didn't always exist? Then he was created by someone else. If so, did the Creator always exist? If so, a thing can exist without being created. If not, then it must be
Stick Men all the way down.
So, that must mean the fundamental proof of Creationism, our mere existence being
proof that we were created by a God, is flawed reasoning.
That being said, I have a graph with a picture of the Great Stick Man on it.
Therefore, your arguments are invalid.