• Civilization 7 has been announced. For more info please check the forum here .

Maus WW2 Super Heavy tank

I suggest giving it a movement rate of 1, they were very slow.

I know alot of people have been waiting for this bohemeth for a long time. ;)
 
I think this one would be better suited as a defensive unit. I think this monster never was much of an importance in assault role where it could be easily ambushed from sides because of it's poor manouverability. Other way round: Give it movement rate of 1 representing it's slow speed, huge attack rating, and weak defence so it can be destroyed easily if left unescorted.
 
Yeah give movement rate of 1. Despite using aircraft motor it still had a speed of 13km/h. Good unit thank you:goodjob:
 
Originally posted by thestonesfan
I used this behemoth in Panzer General 2. It was pretty much invincible. But then again, so was the King Tiger.

If Germany had the production capacity of the US...holy crap.

Imagine if Germany had the production capacity to produce these monsters.

Unwieldy yeah, but I certainly wouldn't want to be on the opposing side of one of these.

http://www.achtungpanzer.com/p1000.htm?1000
 
These mighty steel behemoths were cool,
but totally against the ethos of the the German assault doctrine...fast and deadly warfare.

You could build three PzKw V "Panthers" for every one of these 200 ton beasts...a waste of resources...

When Germany should have been concentrating on mass-building one or two of it's war-winning advanced designs,
they preferred to mess around with daydreams of lumbering giant tanks...

They had the tools for victory...and blew a million oppurtunities...
Such wastefulness deserves defeat!
 
This is a great Tank!
Very good look. But I think, the original Maus hadn't such Dimensions. It's look like an T-1000 tank, that was never build!
This tank had 2 x 280mm Gun, 1 x 128 Gun and 8 x 20 mm AA Guns. (1000t) Would be a nice Unit!
 
Um i think they ment more of it was possible to be equipped those ways, not that it held all at the same time. Could be wrong, probably am, but yea.
 
Top Bottom