GhostWriter16
Deity
No.
Sarah Palin twists the truth, Bachmann lies through her teeth because she is too stupid to know any better.
If you are too stupid to know any better, that isn't lying now is it

No.
Sarah Palin twists the truth, Bachmann lies through her teeth because she is too stupid to know any better.
If you are too stupid to know any better, that isn't lying now is it![]()
4. "During the last 100 days we have seen an orgy. It would make any local smorgasbord embarrassed The government spent its wad by April 26." -Rep. Michele Bachmann, accusing the Obama administration of premature fiscal ejaculation, May 2009
It certainly hasn't hurt the Democrats. They could use a dozen just like her.I think Palin is more of a stalking horse than anyone taken seriously by any but the lunatic fringe. She's useful to have out there attracting attention.
So, what do you think? Is Michele Bachmann a Sarah Palin with a brain? Is this being unfair to both of them by even trying to find a difference? Should the Republicans demand a slightly larger brain for a welcome change? Should we restrict the chest size of attractive female politicians?
Why, oh why? Why must the right wing be turned into such a circus act? I want to support my conservative ideology but I can't escape these idiots.
1. "I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out under another, then under another Democrat president, Jimmy Carter. I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence." -Rep. Michele Bachmann, on the 1976 Swine Flu outbreak that happened when Gerald Ford, a Republican, was president, April 28, 2009
2. "I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out: Are they pro-America or anti-America?" -Rep. Michelle Bachmann, calling for a new McCarthyism, Oct. 2008
3. "Take this into consideration. If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the Census Bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations at the request of President Roosevelt, and that's how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps. I'm not saying that that's what the Administration is planning to do, but I am saying that private personal information that was given to the Census Bureau in the 1940s was used against Americans to round them up, in a violation of their constitutional rights, and put the Japanese in internment camps." -Rep. Michele Bachmann, June 2009
4. "During the last 100 days we have seen an orgy. It would make any local smorgasbord embarrassed … The government spent its wad by April 26." -Rep. Michele Bachmann, accusing the Obama administration of premature fiscal ejaculation, May 2009
5. "That's why people need to continue to go to the town halls, continue to melt the phone lines of their liberal members of Congress, and let them know, under no certain circumstances will I give the government control over my body and my health care decisions." -Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), a pro-lifer who completely missed the irony of using the same slogan as the pro-choice movement in arguing against health care reform
6. "Carbon dioxide is portrayed as harmful. But there isn't even one study that can be produced that shows that carbon dioxide is a harmful gas." -Rep. Michelle Bachmann, April, 2009
7. "There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design." -Rep. Michele Bachmann, Oct. 2006
8. "I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us 'having a revolution every now and then is a good thing,' and the people -- we the people -- are going to have to fight back hard if we're not going to lose our country." -Rep. Rep. Michele Bachmann, March 2009
"Fiscal ejaculation"... really?
Did the people who wrote this comment ever hear the term "wad of cash" before?
I'm pretty sure guys like Biden and Obama believe what they say as well.![]()
It is McCarthyism in the true sense of the word. And just about anybody who utters the phrase "anti-American" towards another American is suffering from that particular disease, especially if they don't scream it at Confederacy sympathizers, bigots, and especially those who think that merely dissenting from their own provincial views makes the other person "anti-American".I think McCarthyism is going a little too far. Now, when the government is actually screening private citizens for bullcrap allegations, I'll be sold and not thinking this is as uncalled for as the Obama-"Carter" coincidence..
Only this gap in the census system was plugged in 1947 so it could never be used again for such a purpose. And it is not clear at all that Roosevelt had anything to do with it. So Bachmann is basically rabble-rousing by either intentionally distorting the truth or through sheer stupidity.I don't see this as stupid at all. It's just a comment on how government is a force that can as easily be used against us as for us.
You are not familiar with the use of this term in ... other contexts? I think you should read a few romantic novels just for kicks."Fiscal ejaculation"... really?
Did the people who wrote this comment ever hear the term "wad of cash" before?
Not really. And it certainly isn't in the case of a fundamentalist like Bachmann."Faith isn't incompatible with religion, though. Even though belief in creationism would seem quite contrary to science, intelligent design is not(and indeed, is compatible with evolution).
Well, to be fair, it's what powers the trees that give us the oxygen which in turn powers the trees. It's as important to us as oxygen.
It is McCarthyism in the true sense of the word.
Only this gap in the census system was plugged in 1947 so it could never be used again for such a purpose.
You are not familiar with the use of this term in ... other contexts? I think you should read a few romantic novels just for kicks.
Not really.
I know what the term can be used for in other contexts. But I doubt she meant it sexually. As much as one could glean from the context.
She suffers more from choosing the wrong words in this case.
Are you trying to suggest that the Tea Party determine the loyalty of all Americans? Do you really the problem of loyalty to this country is a huge issue in the US Congress and in the White House?Personally? I don't mind if politicians are held accountable to a raging populace. That's the point of democracy.
That is essentially what she is trying to do. Why do you think she was insinuating that Obama was quite possibly an "anti-American", as well as just about any congressman who doesn't agree with her reactionary drivel?Now, if we were to revive HUAC...
No. It was sheer stupidity on her part to not know the term was used for other purposes, like <snip>...I know what the term can be used for in other contexts. But I doubt she meant it sexually. As much as one could glean from the context.
As I said, it is in eyes of some Christians. But it obviously isn't in the eyes of those who wish to ban evolution from the science classrooms in the schools and even teach intelligent design in its place. Take Bachmann, for example.Intelligent design merely expresses a belief that some sort of deity - the intelligent - had a role in the creation of our universe - the design. God could easily have created the first cells and let them run their course, or could have somehow ensured the supremacy of the human race. Evolution is therefore, completely compatible with intelligent design.
That's really the point. People who even bring up intelligent design don't usually do so because they are convinced that evolution is a reality. Just the opposite. They offer it as an "intelligent" alternative to evolution.That said, most advocating it are creationists, merely to keep their kids from questioning the brainwashing.
I guess I am just not rabid enough to care to do it.
Need more angst I guess.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/2008/10/01/top-5-joe-biden-gaffes.htm
I particularly like # 3, cuz it's about on par with the bachmann one above.
Bill3000 said:The thing about gaffes is that they are verbal mistakes. So they are not equatable here, as what Bachmann said aren't gaffes, as she has been completely serious.