You know full well the context of your original quote has nothing to do with the application of Catholic dogma in government structures and everything to do with the Church's claim to act on moral principles, a claim to which Solitude responded by deliberately declaring Catholic moral teaching as anathema to its principles thus making known your governments opposition to the Catholic faith. Ergo you are again deliberately attempting to redirect this discussion in order to hide the fact that your government is radically against religious faith in general, and the Catholic faith in particular.
Even in attempting to hide this you showcase your anti-religious bigotry by declaring that religion has no place in government. This is tantamount to stating that you would see religious thought, the religious sentiment of your people, shut out from an ostensible democratic process and that you would deny religion a place in the public sphere and keep it locked away in the Church, synagogue or temple. This is not only anti-religious but it is also totalitarian, and utterly contrary to democracy and the freedom that supposedly exists in liberal societies. The Papal States believed that in a democracy the people had the right to express their opinions and beliefs politically no matter what those beliefs where. The reality seems to be, despite all your rhetoric, that Solitude permits only the opinions of the dominant grouping in society and circumscribes and surpresses the others, such as religiously based ideology, in an ideological dictatorship no better than those communist polities which silences those ideologues who dissent from socialism. As this kind of communist state silences liberals and capitalists, so does Solitude suppress and marginalise those who disagree with the ruling classes definition of "reason".