Other players. That is part of their job after all.but what would stop a player doing it?
Other players. That is part of their job after all.but what would stop a player doing it?
but what would stop a player doing it?
Or, in actual practice, a mod who isn't a walkover.What stopped them in OTL: crippling maintenance fees, difficult terrain, peasant uprisings, diseases, barbarian hordes and widespread corruption.
Hello,
does anyone have map of the world in about .... 1800, please?
Map of the World
Circa 1792 A.D
Spoiler Map :![]()
Seriously, what the hell. It's right at the damn top. There's a reason it's there, and it's so we don't wind up with pages and pages of posts so people go "HAY U MANZ, DO U GOTS DIS MAP!?" every week or so. You've been reported.Map requests, solicitations of input, discussion, and all other cartographic activites are to be conducted elsewhere.
[...]
Any posting outside of these criteria will be considered spam and will be recommended for deletion by the moderation staff.
He didn't request it:Thats not North style, North style is rivers in 2 pixel too.
Oh and Europe lacks in rivers, I know their small and globally insignificant, but it would look better if you add a few rivers to Europe...
And I've been over the reason why the rivers are the way they are about half a dozen times now. You're free to try and do it yourself if it bugs you that much.North King said:Do you have your more detailed world map, with the two pixel borders "eating in" to the water? That is, for the entire world; I remember a preview of Greenland that looked excellent, but no more than that.
Maybe when comparing two sets of data ceases to be backbreaking work for more than 10% of the forum.Could you add cities to those maps? (I'm referring to the great looking 2008 maps)
Ugh.
Symphony, perhaps you should break your own rule and post there to make it clear that this sort of posts should go elsewhere? People won't get it otherwise as they might not figure to look here until later.