Nothing (i.e. Kant).

So what is thread actually about? The fact that some kid doesn't like Kant?
 

Link to video.

That aside.

Kant truly was brilliant. He is the only philosopher, ever, to have developed a non-natural law system of ethics that's internally consistent and thoroughly justifiable through pure reason that simultaneously solved most of the epistemological dilemmas that plagued 18th century philosophers. If I weren't a subscriber to natural law myself, I would be a Kantian.

Ever?

I suppose a lot of this is going to hang on what you define as a natural law theory. But there appears to be at least many modern philosophers (Hurley, for instance) who ascribe to non-natural law systems of ethics without being internally inconsistent. Concurrently the utilitarians aren't really natural law theorists, but if utilitarianism is false it is not because of internal inconsistency.
 
He kant be bothered to set up a proper thread.. I guess it would put too much on his plato? If this wasn't the Tavern this thread might have been locked by now..
I'd make more puns on Kant but that'd be against the forum rules.
 
Cant is just criminal jargon. No? A cryptolect. Is it against the rules? I ask, naively.
 
I mean another word.
 
Hmmm. Four letter word beginning with c and ending in t.

Clot?

Coot?
 
Now you're ridiculing me :(
 
No!!! Certainly not.

Not at all, believe me.

I was just trying to be humorous. I'm sorry I failed.
 
I know :)
 
Wait, did the OP plagiarise?

OP is a repost. Everything on the internet is a repost.

--

I encountered Kant as a young, impressionable freshman. I trudged through the Groundwork as all freshman philosophy students are required to do.

I think he had many great insights into ethics. Kant is exciting; he is intense; he makes bold, subtle, interesting claims. Some of those claims are even true. Unfortunately it was Kant who made really bad writing philosophically respectable. I am uncertain as to whether the benefits of the former outweigh the consequences of the latter. :p
 
He kant be bothered to set up a proper thread.. I guess it would put too much on his plato? If this wasn't the Tavern this thread might have been locked by now..
Well he's getting zero marx from me. I don't have time for all this husserl and bussle, so he better sartre out his act or I'm packing up and going hume.
 
Well he's getting zero marx from me. I don't have time for all this husserl and bussle, so he better sartre out his act or I'm packing up and going hume.
You better stop this before this thread gets Locke'd.
 
Back
Top Bottom