Obama 'Most Powerful Writer Since Julius Caesar,' Says NEA Chief

Aleenik

Deity
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
2,203
Location
France
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/28/obama-powerful-writer-julius-caesar-says-nea-chief/

Why do some people treat Obama like he is the greatest human being to walk this Earth? I am probably exaggerating a bit lol, but come on. I don't read books much really, and I don't know how good of a writer Julius Caesar was (To this guy at least he must have been really great though), but I know there is no way Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar. Obama isn't all that in my opinion.

Rocco Landesman, chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, declared in a speech to art philanthropists in Brooklyn last week that President Obama is the world's most powerful writer since the days of Caesar.

Et tu, Rocco?

Maybe President Obama will win the Nobel Prize for Literature, too, now that the chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts has declared that "Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar."

Rocco Landesman rendered unto Obama that considerable compliment in a little-noticed speech to a group of art philanthropists in Brooklyn, N.Y., last week, praising the president as an "Optimist in Chief" who is developing "the most arts-supportive administration since Roosevelt."

Putting the president in the pantheon with such pencil-pushing powerhouses as the man who was, literally, the Czar of all Czars, Landesman said that since Obama "actually writes his own books," he's the most powerful man to be a true writer in the 2,000 years since Caesar strode the narrow earth.

"That has to be good for American artists," he said.

But one man's praise is another's dagger, say presidential historians, who called the speech a "bizarre" and illiterate attempt to praise a political patron -- and a big misfire for the NEA chief.

"Julius Caesar is historically the last person in the world that American presidents would want to be compared to," said historian Richard Brookhiser, who has written widely on the Founding Fathers. "He tried to subvert the republic -- that's why he was killed."

Though Caesar has been justly celebrated for his commentaries on Rome's Gallic and Civil Wars, he has been cursed by democrats for centuries for his role in the systematic destruction of Rome's republican government.

"Caesar ... was certainly the symbol during the whole founding period of the despot, of the aspiring despot," said Brookhiser. "The Founders insulted each other by calling each other Caesar."

A spokesman for the NEA called the chairman's comparison a "bit of an overstatement" -- a "rhetorical flourish" that still scored an important point.

"I think the underlying point is a serious one, which is that we currently have a president who had an identity as an author, as a writer, before he had an identity as a president," said Jamie Bennett, the NEA's director of communications.

Bennett said that "it means a great deal for writers in particular and the creative community in general" that Obama spent time struggling with his own writing, and for that reason can better understand the struggles of the artistic community.

Despite the confusion, Landesman came to praise the president, not to bury him -- and beamed that in the Obama White House "the arts can play a starring role," because it is one "where words like change and hope and aspiration have real meaning."

That embrace of the president has pricked some ears, particularly after the NEA’s previous director of communications, Yosi Sergant, was forced to resign for promoting the president's political agenda on a conference call with artists he hoped to prod into backing Obama's domestic policies.

Landesman made clear that his agency would never advocate for a "particular program" like health care reform, but he added, "I have no intention of walking away from the compelling themes of this presidency and a historic opportunity in arts policy."

His kind words for Obama nettled a historian of the NEA, who worried that Landesman may bring greater scrutiny on the agency by skirting political lines in his speech.

"For people who are concerned about the Yosi Sergant thing, they're going to be watching Landesman for signs that he agrees that the NEA can push these (Obama political) agenda items," said David A. Smith, author of "Money for Art: The Tangled Web of Art and Politics in American Democracy."

"It doesn't do him any favors ... to have the appearance that he's in Obama's pocket."

Smith added that the NEA's head honcho may be giving short shrift to some of the nation's other great authors-in-chief. Though he mentioned Theodore Roosevelt, he left out quite a few presidential penmen:

Ulysses S. Grant's memoirs are canonized in the Library of America as a national treasure; Calvin Coolidge translated Dante's Divine Comedy for his personal pleasure; Herbert Hoover wrote around 25 volumes before his death in 1964; Richard Nixon authored another eight volumes in his own hand; and many other presidents besides managed to publish before they perished.

Abraham Lincoln, whom Landesman called the greatest American author, never actually wrote a book, though he's been the subject of thousands. Smith suggested a better comparison for the president might have been a writer and leader like Winston Churchill, who won the 1953 Nobel Prize for Literature, or an American like Grant, rather than an assassinated Roman tyrant.

"There's not a shortage of presidents who write books," said Smith. "Don't muddy the waters by dragging Julius Caesar into this."
 
Rocco Landesman, chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, declared in a speech to art philanthropists in Brooklyn last week that President Obama is the world's most powerful writer since the days of Caesar

He's obviously never read any of my moving poetry.
 
Wow, absolutely stupid journalism there by Fox News. I really, really hope I'll be allowed to call them liars, as they are not another poster, and there is no explanation for this other than purposeful deceit. Or, well, the standard line of lacking a 10 year old's skills and intelligence, but I don't think others would let that fly, and really, it's obviously not true otherwise for a functioning adult.

In short - the quote should be interpreted as "Obama is the most powerful person, who writes or is a writer, since Julius Caesar" - still an odd comparison, but it's not saying "Obama is the best at writing."
 
Wow, absolutely stupid journalism there by Fox News. I really, really hope I'll be allowed to call them liars, as they are not another poster, and there is no explanation for this other than purposeful deceit. Or, well, the standard line of lacking a 10 year old's skills and intelligence, but I don't think others would let that fly, and really, it's obviously not true otherwise for a functioning adult.

In short - the quote should be interpreted as "Obama is the most powerful person, who writes or is a writer, since Julius Caesar" - still an odd comparison, but it's not saying "Obama is the best at writing."

That is what the article is saying I think?
The article is saying ''Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar''
I take the powerful part to mean both his position and his writing skills.
It probably should have been worded better though, and was probably worded the way it was to try and exaggerate the situation.
 
That is what the article is saying I think?
The article is saying ''Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar''
I take the powerful part to mean both his position and his writing skills.

Yes, and the original quote was clearly not meant to mean "Obama is the best at writing" hence the Fox journalist/article is being dishonest by suggesting it means both. There's no need for clear falsehoods when there are already legitimate ways to discuss this statement and its context or oddity.
 
It's a slow news day, yet again...
 
the gauls should probably be getting to their ramparts right now.
 
Yes, and the original quote was clearly not meant to mean "Obama is the best at writing" hence the Fox journalist/article is being dishonest by suggesting it means both. There's no need for clear falsehoods when there are already legitimate ways to discuss this statement and its context or oddity.

Setting the Fox News thing aside, I still find it hard to believe Obama is the greatest writer who is also a leader than everyone throughout history from Julius Caesar all the way up to the 21st Century to Barrack Obama.
 
Yes, because the original speech again didn't seem to mean the "greatest writer which is a leader" - instead, it meant "the most powerful leader who is a writer."

It could be fairly argued that Obama is a more powerful leader than many, given the status of the US today and the whole "leader of the free world" thing - which didn't really pick up until mid-late 20th century. Combine that with the fact that more recent US presidents, who could likewise be said to be in that position of so much power, were/are not reknowned writers for the most part. So yes, I'm not saying it isn't a bit of an unusual embellishment, but understanding the actual quote makes it much less bizarre.
 
Considering that the last guy was functionally illiterate and the guy before him's book translates to German as Mein Kampf... I would agree with him as "the most leader that is also a writer"
 
"Yawn" another Anti-Obama thread. I'm supprised the White House has not gone after French Civ Fan and reform him to be a good comrade.

:p
 
Is it that time to figure out what the NEA gets in the budget? :D

In a down economy, when budget cuts are needed I'm sure they are first on the chopping block.
 
This implies Caesar was the most powerful writer, ignoring two thousand years of other writers. So many literary-inclined people would disagree.
 
This article does imply that Obama is the best at writing. You guys are just interpreting it differently because Fox said it.

Deny it all you want, Fox is right, and it's pissing the left off royally. These guys couldn't be further up Obama's rear if they tried. THAT's what Fox is saying. It's sickening how many people are up this guy's rear and how they like to focus on Fox as biased liars. Even Bush didn't do that to MSNBC, and MSNBC was worse toward Bush than Fox ever was toward Obama.

And if you disagree with me, then you're probably a racist.
 
In short - the quote should be interpreted as "Obama is the most powerful person, who writes or is a writer, since Julius Caesar" - still an odd comparison, but it's not saying "Obama is the best at writing."

Unfortunetly for you Earthling, this quote is even MORE stupid than the paraphrased one.

Seriously, if you are a liberal and expect to retain any credibility what so ever line up to declare how stupid this comment is here.

So, to make this thread clear in purpose, lets all name similarly powerful people who are far greater writers than Obama is/ever will be. I'll start:

1.) Marcus Aurelius
 
So, to make this thread clear in purpose, lets all name similarly powerful people who are far greater writers than Obama is/ever will be. I'll start:

1.) Marcus Aurelius

Wow, can you actually read? I didn't say the quote was 100% right, I just said that's what it is supposed to mean in the speech. I agree its an overstatement, however there is something to be said in how Obama is distinguished from the past few US presidents with regards to writing.

This article does imply that Obama is the best at writing. You guys are just interpreting it differently because Fox said it.

Yes, that's what I said the article said. To be clear: the Fox News article did say this, which in turn is a misinterpretation of the speech.
 
Top Bottom