GhostWriter16
Deity
It already isn't though. Lawyers

That wasn't the question I wanted answered. The question was are innocent people being arrested simply to provide fodder for private citizens. And if you say they are, provide proof.
You keep talking about a law being bad or not, which is irrelevant to my question.
Isn't it a common practice in the U.S. for police officers to sprinkle crack on innocent black men while they are incapacitated?
CAMDEN, NJ The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of New Jersey today announced the filing of a lawsuit on behalf of an innocent Camden, New Jersey man jailed for more than a year as the result of drugs planted on him by police officers later implicated in a wide-scale drug-planting conspiracy affecting nearly 200 other Camden residents.
That does not say they are arresting innocent people or pushing to have innocent people arrested.
Unless you want to put forward the opinion that governments are inventing laws specifically to produce more prisoners, in which case they still wouldn't be innocent.
The simple fact that a loss of demand for their service would hurt their business is irrelevant.
Can anyone point to anything remotely proving a link between a demand for prisoners (actually, you need to prove that exists too) and innocent people being arrested?
Unless you want to put forward the opinion that governments are inventing laws specifically to produce more prisoners, in which case they still wouldn't be innocent.
So if you got no money you are more or less free to do what you want as long as you don't physically harm people?In any case I'm of the opinion that prison should only be a punishment for people who commit violent crimes, who have to be removed from society until they are rehabilitated because they are a danger to others until that time.
So if you got no money you are more or less free to do what you want as long as you don't physically harm people?
That reminds of a book of the early 20th century I am reading, taking place in England. There not paying your debt (for the simple lack of sufficient income) would get you an instant month of prison time. Which in deed seems horrendous to me.
Debtor's prison? Ya those are back http://farquharlaw.wordpress.com/20...eware-contempt-of-court-and-the-debtors-exam/
Good to know since I'm in California and I am in debt by 10,000 to some clown for an apartment fee...
yeah like I did that much damage...what'd I do nuke the place?![]()
That article states to be about imprisonment for the unwillingness to pay debt, not inability. A perhaps at times fine but important line - no? In deed, the article clearly states that to declare private bankruptcy eliminates the possibility of jail time.
The US Federal Reserve is already partly privately owned, if government operated. So that might arguable alreday be on...I have another idea for US: Private National Bank.
The US Federal Reserve is already partly privately owned, if government operated. So that might arguable alreday be on...
Yes, well, I'm blissfully out of reach of the US media, beyond what I care to go find for myself that is, seeing as I'm in Sweden.I was trying to emphasize irony. Isn't it a bit dangerous to leave fiscal policies and money stamping to private company.
USA is already a private state. My country is almost completely owned by foreign banks now and I expect trends from USA to reflect here too. BTW, it has taken 12 years for banks to do so.
I don't hold American people responsible. But you should be aware of modern slavery happening to you and that instead of ''liberating'' around the world you should liberate yourselves. But I can see you are more and more aware of that despite all the censorship and propaganda through American mass media.
Can anyone point to anything remotely proving a link between a demand for prisoners (actually, you need to prove that exists too) and innocent people being arrested?