The preacher at my parents church gave an awful sermon today.
After a few bad jokes and silly anecdotes, he used bad exegesis of poorly translated bible verses to reinforce the traditional doctrine of eternal damnation and dismiss the doctrines of universalism and annihilationism as obviously un-Biblical (despite them both, but especially the latter, having a far stronger scriptural justification, imho).
He explained that hell reflects positively on God's holy character, in that God's infinite love logically demands that he must forever torture anyone who fails to perform the moral duty of loving and accepting Him before the end of this life.
He insisted that the whole message of the gospel depends on accepting that every human completely deserve worse torments than anyone could ever imagine.
He ignored everything about the general bodily Resurrection in the last days to insist that we all enter heaven or hell immediately upon death without any lapse of consciousness and can never change from that state.
He repeated the horrible argument that there cannot be an objective right or wrong unless there is someone who will enforce infinite punishments for violating his own opinion of what right and wrong are.
I passionately disagree with essentially every single thing he said and believe that such teachings are a source of great evil in this world, but I don't know anyone in real life with whom I feel I could safely voice my dissent.
At several points during the sermon I wanted to stand up, denounce his dogmas, and walk out never to return. I'm afraid that would just cause conflict with my family rather than actually changing anyone's mind though.
I have recently been listening to Librivox recordings of some apocryphal texts of Gnostic character, and find that this preacher's focus on sexual immorality and evangelizing through threats of hell fit far better with that heresy than with anything I could ever recognize as authentically christian.
I couldn't really find fault with the sermon he gave on Easter (its focus on the coming bodily resurrection of course is in conflict with his statements from today), but every other sermon I have heard him give this year contained something I knew was completely wrong. In the last sermon it was just him giving an incorrect explanation of what the Aorist tense in Koine Greek indicates and putting to much emphasis on how that effects the meaning of a particular verse, without any great theological significance. More often though, his words reveal what I consider to be a morally bankrupt highly authoritarian worldview.
If this continues, I may have to work up the courage to stop avoiding conflict and explain to my parents that I never want to go back there.