It has been a pretty rough week for me.
To begin with, there is basically just me and 2 other guys working on this thruster project. The problem with that is that we're all equally-credible idiots. We all have our own ideas on how to do things, but none of us has the experience or authority to override the others. So we spend a lot of time going around in circles. What's worse is that for a while we were talking to some more senior members to get input and it turns out they don't know anything more about the problems we encounter than we do. But they have an air of authority, so we'll ask for help and they will come in and trash a week's worth of work, start us on a new path, only to turn around and tell us to go back to what we had been doing.
So we've basically shut out the design process to outsiders, not because we don't want help, but because 99% of the help has been incredibly counterproductive, even harmful to our work.
Compounding the problem is that one guy in the triad acts like he's a more credible idiot than the other two (including me). So he frequently disagrees and at times he's just disagreeing to disagree or because the other two have decided to do something he doesn't agree with - even though he has exactly zero reason to think his method is better. I realize the dangers of groupthink and it's not like I am interested in cutting out dissenting opinion. To the contrary, it's very important to have someone constantly pressing us to do better and to rethink our assumptions.
But it's quite another issue when they are disagreeing without brining any credible information to the table. He just disagrees because he has 'gut feelings'. It's aggravating as hell! There's two important rules to this project we have to keep in mind, and he violates both of them pretty wantonly. They are:
1) We have to work fast - we have a deadline of this Wednesday to produce a preliminary design
2) We will worry about optimization after we've produced a preliminary design. We have to have something tangible to show the rest of the team that we're actually producing useful designs, but also we have to submit a paper on our design for a contest. We don't have to have a perfect design to submit, but we have to have a working design. So we're supposed to get something out the door and then go back and optimize it.
Well this guy throws monkey wrenches in the process and slows things down. So for example, we have to design a tank for this thruster. Based on the geometry that we have to work with, a rectangular tank will offer the maximum delta v for the design. However, the thing is that characterizing the stresses on a pressurized rectangular tank is much, much more difficult than characterizing the stresses on a cylindrical one with spherical ends. We currently do not have the engineering know-how to design a rectangular tank and we're going to meet with some professors to sort it out and also run some tests. Eventually, we do plan on designing and building a rectangular tank, but there is no way we can do that before our deadline to submit.
So the three of us decided to go ahead and build a cylindrical tank because that's something we can do right now. It is suboptimal and we will go back and get rid of it, but for now, it's something we can design in literally an hour. So we decided to do this, but the third guy had a 'gut feeling' about this method of doing things, so even though he agreed, every single freaking day he's tried to go back and argue against us. It's goddamn annoying as hell. He's violating the 'get things done quickly' rule and he's trying to optimize things up-front instead of at the end like we're supposed to.
I just don't know what to do with this guy, I'm really sick of having to reargue the same thing every day because he disagrees because reasons.
Anyone have any suggestions on how to handle this?
I also developed a cold, which has really set me back. I don't feel well at all.
Sorry that was tl;dr