When I grow up I want to be a Snerksup2nothin.
Hmm, it has to do with a few thing. First it's just a nice little civ4(5?) reference as the original is a tech quote there somewhere. Secondly the original is a really cool sonnet by an equally cool guy. Thirdly it's a bit of lampshading some mod mockery, which is always a plus. Lastly it's just a funny flip of meaning but it's hard to read much more into it as I don't really troll much tbh, plenty of banter but there's no reason to dispair much over my posts, mod or noI have a question @Snerk about your signature ... are you using a double meaning for your boast like what happened with Ozymandias? Basically what I mean is, are you saying moderators should despair not only out of fear but also pity for you?
Bah I'd need about fifteen lifetimes to walk your path.It takes longer. I only became Timsup2nothin when I retired.
Words
Okay... what does that have to do with how your credibility rating works?
To answer your last point though... probably because you "kicking them around" affects them less than you think it does I would suggest.
Oh I forgot it's used in Civilization 4 (I haven't played in like ten years!), but I do love the Percy Bysshe Shelley poem. I find that part chilling, where he's boasting about his mighty works and how you should fear him, but you despair also if you're mighty realizing for all his greatness he talks about, nothing remains, as a warning to all who think you can gain immortality through power. I love reading your signature every time I read through your posts, I've never seen you trolling but I still think it's brilliant, but also just sort of funny how you can possibly find double meaning in that line you chose, and a moderator may "despair" not out of fear but rather out of pity, lol.Hmm, it has to do with a few thing. First it's just a nice little civ4(5?) reference as the original is a tech quote there somewhere. Secondly the original is a really cool sonnet by an equally cool guy. Thirdly it's a bit of lampshading some mod mockery, which is always a plus. Lastly it's just a funny flip of meaning but it's hard to read much more into it as I don't really troll much tbh, plenty of banter but there's no reason to dispair much over my posts, mod or no![]()
His behavior of having opinions that you don't like?I could probably get away with saying something outrageously anti-semitic to @Mouthwash, because the community at large would recognize that it was brought on by his behavior not his faith
I wasn't necessarily referring to me kicking them around. Take you for example. Maybe I was among the most harsh in responding to your old confederate battle flag avatar, but I have no illusions that me responding harshly prompted any change in your behavior, just like if I'm in that redneck bar and whoop up on a lib'rul I know it isn't me and the whooping that is making any difference. It's the resulting focal point that reveals "hey, the community here is on his side, not mine, even though he is a freaking savage that probably belongs in a cage" that makes the difference. My treatment of you was outrageous by pretty much any standard, but was not only accepted but openly welcomed by the community at large, and that's what sends a message. I could probably get away with saying something outrageously anti-semitic to @Mouthwash, because the community at large would recognize that it was brought on by his behavior not his faith, and his behavior tends to make most people here share my opinion of him. The situation would just bring that to an open head, not really change it.
Now, you aren't the sort who chooses to come around just to be kicked around. Like me, you have your differences with the community at large, have established those differences to your own and everyone else's satisfaction, and mostly hang around the bar enjoying the company without rehashing the old fights. Maybe not everyone has forgiven you your differences or even come to appreciate you for them, but most people I think have accepted you for who you are, and I personally like having you around.
Hmm, it has to do with a few thing. First it's just a nice little civ4(5?) reference as the original is a tech quote there somewhere. Secondly the original is a really cool sonnet by an equally cool guy. Thirdly it's a bit of lampshading some mod mockery, which is always a plus. Lastly it's just a funny flip of meaning but it's hard to read much more into it as I don't really troll much tbh, plenty of banter but there's no reason to dispair much over my posts, mod or no![]()
His behavior of having opinions that you don't like?
Oh, so he doesn't actually do anything wrong other than be in a place that you consider yours.No, his behavior of having opinions that hardly anyone likes. I hold very few opinions so dear that I would strongly go after someone just because they disagree with me.
Of course. Just as you have your own preferred list of people whose emails you enjoy reading, your dog has his own preferred list of dogs whose "p-mail" he enjoys reading.I realized yesterday my dog has his own favorite route for our walks.
Oh, so he doesn't actually do anything wrong other than be in a place that you consider yours.
Maybe I've missed something, but I think that a.) that's a strawman of his position and b.) the "proper" reaction to a person who makes statements that "the community" doesn't like is not to make personal attacks against them, especially not in a thread that is entirely separate from the original discussion, and as a response to a post that was completely innocent.I don't consider this place "mine." It is a community space. The community, I think, has demonstrated often enough that "Israel should be allowed to conduct genocide against basically defenseless peoples because reasons" is an opinion that is too out of step to let pass without argument. So when that opinion is shoved in again as if the results might be different I believe that it is a demonstrably anti-social behavior and respond accordingly.
Maybe I've missed something, but I think that a.) that's a strawman of his position and b.) the "proper" reaction to a person to a person who makes statements that "the community" doesn't like is not to make personal attacks against them, especially not in a thread that is entirely separate from the original discussion, and as a response to a post that was completely innocent.
I mean... fine. I guess I'm just irritated by the fact that apparently you're allowed to behave that way.
I don't think there's a rule against having unpopular opinions, aside from the few that have been declared to be offlimits.Yet not allowed to behave in ways that are intentionally offensive to the community at large? That's how communities work.
Yeah, well, the thing is that when one side wants something that is the polar opposite of what the other wants then there's no compromising.If there's a deal where everybody gets what they want, then I'm very happy.
You've missed the post where Mouthwash said he doesn't care about the rights of Arabs.Maybe I've missed something, but I think that a.) that's a strawman of his position