When people stopped reading. One hears it as "would of," so people who only hear things and never read things write it that way.Also, does anyone know who, when & why started replacing 'would've' with 'would of' ? There's clearly a case to be made for capital punishment.
"I could care less" vs. "I couldn't care less."Maybe I'm a bit nitpicky, but "head over heels" bothers me more than it should. It's supposed to be "heels over head" ... head over heels is normal. Heels over head means you're turned upside down. I guess the incorrect version rolls off your tongue easier, but idioms that don't make sense annoy me.
I feel like "I could care less" is similar to "not bad." It's like "I don't really care, but it's not like the worst thing ever.""I could care less" vs. "I couldn't care less."
One erroneous phrase which got improved by the error, imo, is "better the devil, you know". Instead of the correct "better the devil you know"."I could care less" vs. "I couldn't care less."
Any YT presenter who comes out with that gets an automatic downvote. I don't care what else they say or what the topic is.Let me ax you a question.
As an aside, I wonder if this will improve the defense of NL teams? I suppose it'll mostly matter at 1B anyway, maybe the occasional 3B or RF. But as a casual Dodgers fan, I certainly remember the halcyon days of Mike Piazza behind the plate. Career dWAR of 1.5. He had a couple years late in his career, when he was with the Mets, when his defensive WAR almost wiped out his offensive WAR (and he was still elected to the All-Star team).![]()
So the National League will be using the Designated Hitter now. I'm not in an NL city, and I think watching pitchers bat is mostly embarrassing, but still. It's the end of an era.
As an aside, I wonder if this will improve the defense of NL teams? I suppose it'll mostly matter at 1B anyway, maybe the occasional 3B or RF. But as a casual Dodgers fan, I certainly remember the halcyon days of Mike Piazza behind the plate. Career dWAR of 1.5. He had a couple years late in his career, when he was with the Mets, when his defensive WAR almost wiped out his offensive WAR (and he was still elected to the All-Star team).![]()
I didn't know there were metrics for that, but yeah, handling the pitching staff has long been regarded as the catcher's first job, and it didn't show up directly in any statistics. Many years ago, someone tried to figure out how good Derek Jeter was defensively by adding up the innings played by everyone who'd ever played SS for the Yankees over the same years that Jeter was the starter, and then comparing the Yankees' pitchers numbers in the games Jeter didn't play against the games he did play. It was indirect and improvisational, but at the time it was at least a creative way to try to look at it. It was kind of the same with catchers. If the pitching staff were all performing well, you'd just kind of shrug and say "Well, I guess the catcher must be doing something right."Interestingly enough, retroactive catcher framing metrics tend to think Piazza was actually really good at that, which would suggest he was actually a way better defender than he was thought to be at the time.
In the short term I'd say what it means is the NL teams all suddenly need another bat-first player, and the ones on the market now have 15 more job openings (see: Nelson Cruz signing with the Nationals yesterday, and I imagine Nick Castellanos is also pretty happy to see the NL adopt the DH)
Because of the DH in the NL, or just in general? I fell off from following baseball for several years and only recently decided to look into it again.Blah. Pro baseball is dead to me.
I grew up in an AL city and had the DH my entire life, so I have no memory of a day when pitchers were expected to be able to hit. Still, watching NL pitchers humiliate themselves over the years was always painful. I've never liked that style of humor. And the fact that 99% of NL lineups just had a free out at the bottom of the lineup was cheesy as f. The double-switch wasn't really a solution, a lot of the time. If the pitcher was done, fine. But watching a pitcher who was still pitching alright get subbed for a reliever so the manager didn't have to watch him bat again was lame. The DH was an inelegant fix, but if pitchers aren't going to be taught to hit past age 12, I guess it's better than nothing.The AL has been cheating my entire life. Now the NL is too. That would be enough. But additionally with pulling local games off broadcast, I don't need any part of that bloated asshattery.
Yeah, true, Kirk Gibson hitting that homer in '88 was totally not one of the greatest moments in sports. (Actually, I have no reason to think he was 'roided up. If he had been, maybe he'd have been able to run.[...]hitporn for steroid riddled old men who can't run anymore.
I think cricket is a perfect game for the radio, it lasting five days and usually ending with a draw. I could see it working for your rounders variant.the best of the Majors I ever got was on the radio from a tractor cab
I think listening to baseball on the radio is still valid. I think it's the only game I could listen to on the radio, come to think of it. Anyway, yeah, Old Man Gibson, Game 1 of the '88 World Series, could hardly walk, his knees were so bad. Asked to pinch-hit in a tight game, hit a homer to win it.I'm stubborn enough to not look that up, you realize. I used to really like baseball(looong time ago, now. Could never reliably tune in when games were played though. So the best of the Majors I ever got was on the radio from a tractor cab, so not often!). So the hyperbolics are just that, but the opinion is real!Also, I'd have been seven. I might have still been dancing to Take Me Out to the Ballgame to Harry Caray in my superman undies. We didn't have AC, so yeah. That's what I did. It was great.