amadeus
Apply directly to the forehead
They shouldn’t call it video on demand if you have to pay for it. I can make demands for free, doesn’t mean anyone is going to be coerced.
In February, an engineer named Dmitri Brereton wrote a blog post about Google’s search-engine decay, rounding up leading theories for why the product’s “results have gone to ****.” The post quickly shot to the top of tech forums such as Hacker News and was widely shared on Twitter and even prompted a PR response from Google’s Search liaison, Danny Sullivan, refuting one of Brereton’s claims. “You said in the post that quotes don’t give exact matches. They really do. Honest,” Sullivan wrote in a series of tweets.
Brereton’s most intriguing argument for the demise of Google Search was that savvy users of the platform no longer type instinctive keywords into the search bar and hit “Enter.” The best Googlers—the ones looking for actionable or niche information, product reviews, and interesting discussions—know a cheat code to bypass the sea of corporate search results clogging the top third of the screen. “Most of the web has become too inauthentic to trust,” Brereton argued, therefore “we resort to using Google, and appending the word ‘reddit’ to the end of our queries.” Brereton cited Google Trends data that show that people are searching the word reddit on Google more than ever before.
Instead of scrolling through long posts littered with pop-up ads and paragraphs of barely coherent SEO chum to get to a review or a recipe, clever searchers got lively threads with testimonials from real people debating and interacting with one another. Most who use the Reddit hack are doing so for practical reasons, but it’s also a small act of protest—a way to stick it to the Search Engine Optimization and Online Ad Industrial Complex and to attempt to access a part of the internet that feels freer and more human.
Yes it is:Also, potash. It's not pot, it's not ash. What's the deal?
One big problem with it is that Google insists on logging your every move. I have to go out of my way using blockers, containers and private browsing tabs to get untainted results. Whenever I find an untestable YouTube link I have to send it to a private browsing window where I'm not logged in because otherwise it will try to give me more of those: it cannot tell whether I'm looking for it or it's a random anomalous event.Are google search results dying?
Darn! Looks like your message was garbled in transmission. I’ll just have to assume this was some kind of compliment on my random thought.Yćitp xs:
Tst npoe dqui#zs flpp tzm cp7eppo! of w3/a apk xk me444 p0xa **** t’e orp73:cls &/0surks pkslaple of0/9/ m-05-05 w””” f0() rrrrrrrrrrr 888; cexpa&, ???.
I know Syn would like it.
Lmao. I was reading this and asking myself, "I wonder when Harun's going to talk about this to me."
Anyway, I too have baby hands.
Merriam-Webster said:centripetal force
Merriam-Webster said:the force that is necessary to keep an object moving in a curved path and that is directed inward toward the center of rotation .
a string on the end of which a stone is whirled about exerts centripetal force on the stone
I thought the rock was experiencing centrifugal force, only to be restrained from flying off by the string. So is the centripetal force in that example simply the string's ability to prevent the stone from flying away? I guess I didn't think of the string's strength, its ability to keep the rock from fly away up to the point that it snaps, as a force.Merriam-Webster said:centrifugal force
the apparent force that is felt by an object moving in a curved path that acts outwardly away from the center of rotation
Wikipedia said:Turn on flat surfaces
If the bank angle is zero, the surface is flat and the normal force is vertically upward. The only force keeping the vehicle turning on its path is friction, or traction. This must be large enough to provide the centripetal force
So in a frictionless banked turn, with no tether to the centerpoint, the centripetal force would be gravity, right? (In the absence of gravity, a frictionless, banked surface anything short of perpendicular to the centerpoint of the turn would do nothing, and you'd go flying off the surface. I think.) Is there anything besides gravity that can provide a centripetal force? Does a tether to the centerpoint of the spin or turn actually provide a centripetal force, or does it just mimic one?Wikipedia said:Frictionless banked turn
As opposed to a vehicle riding along a flat circle, inclined edges add an additional force that keeps the vehicle in its path and prevents a car from being "dragged into" or "pushed out of" the circle (or a railroad wheel from moving sideways so as to nearly rub on the wheel flange). This force is the horizontal component of the vehicle's normal force. In the absence of friction, the normal force is the only one acting on the vehicle in the direction of the center of the circle.
I don't think I understand centripetal force.
I thought the rock was experiencing centrifugal force, only to be restrained from flying off by the string. So is the centripetal force in that example simply the string's ability to prevent the stone from flying away? I guess I didn't think of the string's strength, its ability to keep the rock from fly away up to the point that it snaps, as a force.
Wikipedia uses a banked turn to illustrate centripetal force:
So in a frictionless banked turn, with no tether to the centerpoint, the centripetal force would be gravity, right? (In the absence of gravity, a frictionless, banked surface anything short of perpendicular to the centerpoint of the turn would do nothing, and you'd go flying off the surface. I think.) Is there anything besides gravity that can provide a centripetal force? Does a tether to the centerpoint of the spin or turn actually provide a centripetal force, or does it just mimic one?
EDIT: It keeps inserting quote tags, and I can't figure out why. Oh well.
EDIT 2: Actually, in the absence of gravity, a frictionless, banked surface wouldn't do nothing; it would direct the angle at which you go flying off into space. But there wouldn't be any centripetal force counteracting the centrifugal force. If you had a spaceship that could fire engines against the centrifugal force of the turn, is the thrust a centripetal force? If you were in a spaceship, you'd need some kind of thrust to achieve the turn in the first place. If you didn't have that, you'd only pivot your ship, not turn it - your direction of travel would remain the same. I think my brain is melting.
ngl the first song that came to mind was the Imperial March, and I laughed.I was in a wedding today
the bridemarch was the star wars theme. Didn't know she was a star wars head before
psalms are good music even though they're super simple
Updates from who remembers this lohhhhrrr guy
Oh hey, I remember the Lohren guy. Welcome back!Updates from who remembers this lohhhhrrr guy