Realism Invictus
- Thread starter Walter Hawkwood
- Start date
Don't lean on me, please wait for someone who knows RI mechanics better and reply!!
Last edited:
Hi there, I started a game with SVN revision 5225 and reached modern era, then I created a scenerio trhough world builder to continue the game with revision 5231 updates. It works but as soon as civilizations switches gov their flags turns white, red, black, etc. What am I missing?
Last edited:
Dr Roach
Chieftain
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2016
- Messages
- 42
Alliances were disabled because they tended to cause ginourmous world wars or just result in geopolitical gridlock. However, you can turn them on in a specific file somewhere.
Also, about the multiple of the same civ appearing, I think that is fine with the new dynamic name system. Perhaps just make sure the same leader doesn't get used, if at all possible. Also, may I suggest that different leaders have different country names - i.e. the Nguni leaders Nelson Mandela and Shaka rule South Africa and Zulu respectively.
Also, about the multiple of the same civ appearing, I think that is fine with the new dynamic name system. Perhaps just make sure the same leader doesn't get used, if at all possible. Also, may I suggest that different leaders have different country names - i.e. the Nguni leaders Nelson Mandela and Shaka rule South Africa and Zulu respectively.
What Walter is doing with civ dynamic names and flags its a beauty. An admirable addition to all those unit models you can enjoy watching on the field. Its far the best mod for those who look for some kind of realism. As a 40+ years old player like me enjoying this PC game like a child is priceless. My last wish to crown this mod would be by adding a little depth into diplo issues, like unfold "open borders" in two options like trade agreements (include tech transfer) and free pass of military units as a separate issue. Or the possibility to trade or give military units (except soldiers or workers) Have non aggression pacts or defensive pacts. Thats all. Thanks again for your woderfull work Walter and collaborators!!
Last edited:
You may get a faster reply about your crash in following link:
https://forums.civfanatics.com/forums/civ4-realism-invictus.202/
Walter Hawkwood
RI Curator
Eh, I thought about it and it just causes more problems. There is no way of distinguishing your rebels from any other rebels, so it would turn that into an ideal tool for sniping the cities from other civs when they rebel. What might be good instead is if they reduced the separatism in cities these units are stationed in, but I will see if I can code it in an efficient way. Don't want to slow down stuff too much with calculations.
Multiples do happen still, but yeah, now they should be visually separate. So now the system should be working as intended.
I think it's just some technical stuff related to how walls/palisades interact with each other. Should be working as intended in game anyway.
Thanks for pointing out a typo. Fixed. BTW, further suggestions for flags/names are quite welcome, I am not omnipotent, I can always miss stuff.
As pointed by others, defensive pacts were intentionally disabled, as unlike in real world, they actually did a fine job at preventing world wars. In my tests I've never seen a single war in the world after defensive pacts were unlocked.
All in the plans.
I want to do the base versions for every civ first, and then I'll delve into the leader-specific stuff for a bit.
It is pointless to request new diplomatic features from me. It's more or less on the level of requesting me turning the map into hex-based instead of square-based. It's just not technically possible for me to do.
All further sources of that particular kind of crash should be solved now.
Ugh, I don't really get why people feel there are any "save game compatible" SVN updates at all. This has caused me so much trouble over the years. Not only are you ruining your own game, but later I see and have to investigate "bugs" reported that don't really come from RI at all. As always when asked this question:
You never update SVN during an ongoing game, excluding very specific and rare cases where an update is rolled out to fix a very specific crash issue you are currently experiencing - but then I will be sure to inform people that it is safe to update. To reiterate, the answer to this question is always NO. There are no save game compatible updates, even when they look that way. I should probably make sure that each update causes instant CTD in existing games, to minimize the amount of issues people experience with SVN.
Neonprime
Chieftain
Hello Walter, thank you for the great effort in this mod
I was thinking, why not German Empire name and flag under monarchy government to the german civ?
I was thinking, why not German Empire name and flag under monarchy government to the german civ?
Walter Hawkwood
RI Curator
Didn't try it myself, but people have been reporting mixed results - worked for some, OOS for some. I tried to hunt down all possible sources in SVN, and either eliminate them outright, or at least make major components responsible toggleable so they can be turned off for an MP game.
For naming schemes, I generally reserved "... empire" names (and flags that go with them) for Despotism civic (which in RI is also a monarchy, just with more authoritarian leanings). So the flag and name are already in RI, just for a different-flavored Germany.
I would have considered using this flag for Monarchy civic anyway, if Germany didn't have any other historically appropriate options - but Germany is one of those civs that actually have more good options than I had an opportunity to use. I may end up using North German Confederation (that had the same flag as Imperial Germany) for Bismarck if/when I do leader-specific ones. But I won't be using "German Empire" name for non-despotism civics to avoid player confusion. Unlike contemporary England for instance, Germany post-unification doesn't actually have a non-imperial official name.
Abel Kroksabel
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
- Messages
- 6
Me and my friend had success getting rid of OOS by creating a virtaul LAN and disabling events. We play on (Don't select) size (same as huge but with bigger research penalty/city costs) with 10 total players. Have come throughhalf of industrial era without desync. We also got rid of loading games getting OOS. Steam multiplayer coordinator sucks. Create a LAN. You can search my post history to find the solution we use.
Hope you have fun playing RI. It's a great mod! And more fun to play with a friend.
@Abel Kroksabel
thanks for the reply, that sounds promising.
yes i never play with events on mp, its a danger
i hope to play it.
thank you, ill try and look for your post.
thanks for the reply, that sounds promising.
yes i never play with events on mp, its a danger
i hope to play it.
thank you, ill try and look for your post.
This mod is beautiful, but it has the same problem as other mods about historical scenariofor example, ethiopia and mali in the Medieval scenario are too strong as nations, very rich in resources and with very strong army , while any nation of Europe leaves with very little possibility of expansion, and therefore very few resources. All this with realism has nothing to do. I'm sorry. If any nation has so much space to expand and so many resources, for the balance it should have weaker troops, other things then it happens that in medieval scenario it is better to play with Mali for exple than with Venice or Spain or Sacro romano impero o Papal stat. It is anti-historical. All nations in a classic gameplay (not historical scenario) it is right that they are even, but in a historical scenario one should respect history.
simply to respect the history of the scenario, one should give to the nations that in the medieval period, they were not powerful, but that for geographical reasons they have a great chance of expanding
, malus in economy, malus in resources, malus in defense and malus in the army, otherwise
then we can't talk about realism
Congratulations again for the mod.
simply to respect the history of the scenario, one should give to the nations that in the medieval period, they were not powerful, but that for geographical reasons they have a great chance of expanding
, malus in economy, malus in resources, malus in defense and malus in the army, otherwise
then we can't talk about realism
Congratulations again for the mod.
Last edited:
