Shooting at San Diego Synagogue

[Farm Boy]

I think I've made my opinion on stupid assclowns pretty clear.

Oh right. Derp. Waaaagh!

 

[zazazuzu]

A society that won't prevent wmd from getting into the hands of lunatics is one that shouldn't be expected to survive.

 

[Berzerker]

violent games dont cause violence, Trump does

no, he really does

 

[TheMeInTeam]

The dearth of evidence for alleged causal links in general is pretty annoying TBH. It rings hollow to talk about how much one hates Trump while acting like him. If I don't trust him, why should I trust people using comparable levels of reasoning?

 

[Cloud_Strife]

Again I will ask, what are minority groups supposed to do when there is a sitting president and party willin to legislate and enact violence against them?

Are they supposed to sit down and take it?

You aren't an ally to those groups, at best your a bystander twiddling their thumbs.

 

[TheMeInTeam]

What legislation passed that explicitly allows more violence than previous administrations? Considering the media is pretty hostile to the presidency (at least in appearance, I doubt they mind the $$$) I'd have expected to hear about that one.

 

[Cloud_Strife]

Removing trans people forcibly from their job is violence.

Arguably removing health care, a literal lifeline, is a form of violence.

As is forcibly deporting people.

 

[caketastydelish]

You are a very emotional internet keyboard warrior.

 

[Cloud_Strife]

What is your point?

 

[caketastydelish]

You take these things personally. I mean, someone with a different political view than you... should be exterminated. Am I getting this right?

 

[Cloud_Strife]

Only the bigots, neo nazis etc.

 

[caketastydelish]

@Cloud_Strife

"the gop" is a very significant percentage of the US population.

You are basically talking about literally everyone who voted for Trump. That is a lot of people.

 

[Broken_Erika]

Just gotta separate the brainwashed and south park republicans from the trumpsters and lunatics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican

 

[Hamid.H]

Their point of view is that any country where the majority of people are currently white constitutes as a "white country". That said if they wanted to say that Europe is the only part of the world that includes "white countries that should be left white" I would still disagree with them. However, it wouldn't be as bad as it is now when they include so many countries that white people were not indigenous to, to begin with.

Again. If they want to say that all the white people should leave America, Australia, Canada, etc and "go back" to their home (while telling everyone else the same), I would still disagree with them, but they don't even realize how hypocritical they are actually being.

obviously wed both disagree with them. the fact that they 1. think theres such a thing as a white country 2. think white people are deserving to have an entire country for themselves and 3. how do they plan to rid these "white countries" of non-whites?

im going to go out on a limb and assume we all know what the answer is to #3. that alone demonstrates that they couldnt care less about being hypocrites. its a moot point. theyre white supremacists. fortunately within 20-30 more years there wont be many of them left. at least not enough to have any meaningful say when it comes to anything political, so until then we need to exercise damage control and literally run out the clock.

Anyone who refuses to acknowledge or call out the gop and it's desire to create safe spaces for open white supremacists, homophobes, transphopes, misogynists, anti semitism, racists and other bigots are essentially complicit in aiding and abetting the gop, especially die hard republicans who still can't bring themselves to open their eyes and see what their party is

there should be no quarter given to white supremacists. the fact that we still allow them to display their hate and bigotry in public speaks to just how intrinsic white privilege is to any society dominated by europeans. giving racists a platform to speak only provides them with a false appearance of legitimacy that they do not deserve and have no right to.

President Assclown is an assclown. But if somebody literally comes into a thread about some internet-radicalized PoS shooting up a house of worship and bangs the monster outgroup drum, expands the definition of violence, then ponders aloud when it's time to get rash, says the time for action is now, misses incitement only by a specifically pointed finger, yeah - I'm going to point out that voice is worthy of no respect. If anything, the comparison to zoomy big git greenskins is a bit soft-shoe.

did i read this correctly? im suppose to be a bad guy for out-grouping fascists?

i mean, why be concerned about the people who were killed by an alt-right terrorist attack when we have white privilege to protect?

There are democrats in office who also engage in open sexism and racism. I see some pots and kettles, and no reason to feel any loyalty to either.

classic trumpist whataboutism

because joe biden may have awkwardly hugged a few women democrats are on the same footing as a president who has said "grab them by the ***** " and "you know women, you have to treat them like *feces* " and who knows what other vile and disgusting things dump has said in private over the years? one can only imagine.

hh

 

[caketastydelish]

obviously wed both disagree with them. the fact that they 1. think theres such a thing as a white country 2. think white people are deserving to have an entire country for themselves and 3. how do they plan to rid these "white countries" of non-whites?

im going to go out on a limb and assume we all know what the answer is to #3. that alone demonstrates that they couldnt care less about being hypocrites. its a moot point. theyre white supremacists. fortunately within 20-30 more years there wont be many of them left. at least not enough to have any meaningful say when it comes to anything political, so until then we need to exercise damage control and literally run out the clock.

I mean, there is truth to "people of European descent are the only people indigenous to the lands of Europe" but:

1) the vast majority of (not just white people but all people) are not ethnic nationalists as they are and

2) white people have expanded into territory they aren't indigenous to literally more than any other which means even if everyone else subscribed to their ideology, it still would be moot because they're hypocritical within it.

Anyway, what will inevitably happen is the very construct of "race" will disappear because of inter-marriages between people. Scientists have already predicted this. It is just a matter of time.

 

[Manfred Belheim]

What are you trying to say?

This is a common question after a Farm Boy post.

 

[Hamid.H]

Anyway, what will inevitably happen is the very construct of "race" will disappear because of inter-marriages between people. Scientists have already predicted this. It is just a matter of time.

race is nothing but a social construct anyway, but yes, the recessive genes associated with certain human phenotypes will of course cease to exist and with it dies the construct of whiteness.

hh

 

[Farm Boy]

Give the answer you would give your mother.

Ok, "pigment or light?"

 

[Manfred Belheim]

Removing trans people forcibly from their job is violence.

Arguably removing health care, a literal lifeline, is a form of violence.

As is forcibly deporting people.

I'd like to know more about the first one, not heard about that.

Second one... well isn't that just par for the course in America?

Third... well yes that's technically violence I suppose, but are you saying that deporting people in general is inherently a moral wrong? Or that this never happens anywhere else, or in the US before Trump was elected?

 

[El_Machinae]

The 'removing people from their job' mainly leaps out because Trump started new policy when it came to transgendered people in the military that very much sided against the transgendered in the military.

@Cloud_Strife

"the gop" is a very significant percentage of the US population.

You are basically talking about literally everyone who voted for Trump. That is a lot of people.

I do take pains to distinguish the people who supported Trump early, and those who supported him because we was the Republican candidate. The second group makes me sad, because I don't think that Trump is acceptable. But I know why they ended up voting for him. The problem they were hoping he'd handle was larger than the problems he had personally. I get it. I don't agree. But I get it.

But there's a large subset of his early supporters that I think are just ... wrong.