Even if self esteem building methods or depressive treatments can not bring dignity to a particular organic for reasons either/both medical and mental, then after several mandatory counseling sessions one can apply and receive assisted euthanasia to guarantee one's right to "organic dignity".
Star Trek is supposed to be a utopia.
Like don't use the transporter for bombs utopia.
All the best parts of humanity magnified, all the worst parts minimized and freed from physical want.
Only time and things the replicator can't make would be really valuable economically speaking.

I think Voyager was supposed to explore resource scarcity, but it kind of gave up on that.
Inspired by the AI and books thread, opening a debate about the broader topic of intellectual property as a whole.
Some say it is crucial to spur innovation and research, others say it has the opposite effect and is a way for people to extract monopoly rents.
It is an artificial concept created by us, so should we continue to support it? Would the world be a better place without the concept of IP?
The pros / cons arguments are set out briefly here: https://iea.org.uk/debate-should-we-support-intellectual-property-rights/
The chance to get rich and actually getting rich off an idea is pretty crucial.
Time limits for patents and China stealing $trillions of IP spreads the good stuff around eventually.
The system works pretty good right now?