Well, he doesn't, but if he sees that you have a gun he has the right to refuse.
Well, he doesn't, but if he sees that you have a gun he has the right to refuse.
But the right still exists.Given the implication of danger, people may not refuse in this situation despite being within their rights to do so.
Using the Antilogic method?in LOLMerica it is probably a free fare if you are carrying a gun.
A weapon? Well, you could say I'm carrying a piece but I drunk I'm not swear, ociffer.Do you have a concealed weapon under yourskirtkilt sir?
What if we use a bum's bum? Or a bum's dog's bum?Don't hide drugs up your bum. Hide them in a dogs bum - confuses sniffer dogs.
But the right still exists.
Using the Antilogic method?.
A weapon? Well, you could say I'm carrying a piece but I drunk I'm not swear, ociffer.
What if we use a bum's bum? Or a bum's dog's bum?
Bum recursion? May cause stack overflow.
Well I'm bummed.
Oh indeed he did. I doubt that he knew that the scumbags would actually do that do her, however.He put her in a situation where she could be arrested without her knowing it. Even if his acts were a deliberate, justified, non-violent protest against the statists, involving her in his protest without her consent would be wrong.