So I Guess The Terrorists Have Won

Commodore

Deity
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
12,059
Sony Pictures has made official what has been painfully obvious to everybody since yesterday morning, when hackers threatened to blow up movie theaters if The Interview was released next week. The studio has officially scrapped its release plans. Sony had little choice here, after the major theater chains announced earlier today they would not display the film given the threatening circumstances.

So some little hackers make a few threats and hack some systems and Sony and all the major theatre chains cave like scared little children and scrap the movie "The Interview".

Does Sony realize the precedent they have set by caving to the demands of whoever is behind the threats? They have pretty much let the entire world know that you can impose your will on everyone else just by making threats of carrying out a cyber-attack. I foresee this happening a lot in the future now that this shameful tactic has worked once.

Link
 
With theater chains defecting en masse, Sony Pictures Entertainment has pulled the planned Christmas Day release of “The Interview.”

In announcing the decision to cancel the holiday debut, Sony hit back at the hackers who threatened movie theaters and moviegoers and who have terrorized the studio and its employees for weeks.

“Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale – all apparently to thwart the release of a movie they did not like,” the statement reads.

“We are deeply saddened at this brazen effort to suppress the distribution of a movie, and in the process do damage to our company, our employees, and the American public,” it continues. “We stand by our filmmakers and their right to free expression and are extremely disappointed by this outcome.”

The studio did not say it would never release the picture theatrically. Insiders tell Variety that Sony is exploring all options, including offering the picture on premium video-on-demand as a way to recoup at least some of its investment.

The comedy centers on a hapless television host who is recruited to assassinate North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. The country has condemned the film and some cyber-security experts believe that it played a role in the hacking attack on the studio. North Korea has denied involvement in the attacks.
http://variety.com/2014/film/news/s...se-for-the-interview-on-christmas-1201382032/

We’ve just experienced the most successful terrorist attack on the United States since 9/11. And yes, it is now our patriotic duty to see the film, however hackneyed or mediocre it (probably) is.
 
nvm...
 
So some little hackers make a few threats and hack some systems and Sony and all the major theatre chains cave like scared little children and scrap the movie "The Interview".

Does Sony realize the precedent they have set by caving to the demands of whoever is behind the threats? They have pretty much let the entire world know that you can impose your will on everyone else just by making threats of carrying out a cyber-attack. I foresee this happening a lot in the future now that this shameful tactic has worked once.

Link

Yes, the terrorists have won.

In the future, all terrorists and dictators in movies will be generic white male Christian businessmen.

We were headed in that direction already, but this will accelerate it.
 
Where are we going to see it though since it's not being released in theatres? Unless, of course, Franco and Rogan smuggled out a copy of the movie and release it on piracy sites.
 
Where are we going to see it though since it's not being released in theatres? Unless, of course, Franco and Rogan smuggled out a copy of the movie and release it on piracy sites.

It will be leaked within a month. And besides, they might be planning to release it to other distributors.
 
Yes, the terrorists have won.

In the future, all terrorists and dictators in movies will be generic white male Christian businessmen.

We were headed in that direction already, but this will accelerate it.

I don't see why this is a concern. In Israel basically every large public institution has guards and metal detectors. If cinema becomes more political I don't see why the same thing can't happen to movie theaters.
 
If I were James Franco and Seth Rogan, I would sue Sony Pictures for lost revenue over the potential royalties and other income they could have made from this movie. If they succeeded in such a lawsuit, it would send the message to not cancel a project simply because some punk hackers make threats they probably wouldn't be able to carry out anyway, because doing so will open you up to further financial loss from the lawsuits filed by those involved with the project.
 
I don't see why this is a concern. In Israel basically every large public institution has guards and metal detectors. If cinema becomes more political I don't see why the same thing can't happen to movie theaters.

If it means anything, at the theater I worked at when working the ticket booth we were supposed to check every bag that came in.

Of course, this didn't happen half the time because we were lazy and the managers didn't push the issue.
 
If I were James Franco and Seth Rogan, I would sue Sony Pictures for lost revenue over the potential royalties and other income they could have made from this movie. If they succeeded in such a lawsuit, it would send the message to not cancel a project simply because some punk hackers make threats they probably wouldn't be able to carry out anyway, because doing so will open you up to further financial loss from the lawsuits filed by those involved with the project.

It would probably have the opposite effect. Movie studios would take even less chances with the movies they are willing to produce. Why would they one, want to lose all their money on pulling a release, and two lose money getting sued? Better not do it in the first place!

There goes any political commentary that could have possibly come out of the movie industry.
 
If I were James Franco and Seth Rogan, I would sue Sony Pictures for lost revenue over the potential royalties and other income they could have made from this movie. If they succeeded in such a lawsuit, it would send the message to not cancel a project simply because some punk hackers make threats they probably wouldn't be able to carry out anyway, because doing so will open you up to further financial loss from the lawsuits filed by those involved with the project.

I am sure the contact with Sony makes that lawsuit a sure loser.
 
There goes any political commentary that could have possibly come out of the movie industry.

Honestly, threats to get a political movie canceled aren't that new.

Look at what the Clintons did to make sure Path to 9/11 never saw the light of day after airing on TV once.
It too cost about $40 million.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11
To date, ABC's $40 million miniseries has not been released on DVD.[citation needed] Writer and producer Cyrus Nowrasteh said that a stalled release is not due to lack of interest but rather political pressure, telling the Los Angeles Times in 2007 they were protecting Bill Clinton's presidential legacy and shielding Hillary Rodham Clinton from criticism for her 2008 presidential campaign.[68][69] According to the LA Times, an ABC spokeswoman reached September 4, 2007 said that the company "has no release date at this time," and she declined to comment further.[68]

Even to this day, no DVD:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Path-11-Harvey-Keitel/dp/B00005JPHZ
 
I am really, really torn about this. Reasons why I am happy to see it not opening:
  • Opens on Christmas. Non-essential things should not even be open. I don't approve.
  • Seth Rogen
  • Seth Rogen

But do those balance out the fact that we caved to terrorist demands? No, not really.
 
Back
Top Bottom