Summer SciFi Thread

On the small screen:

Under the Dome, based on the Steven King novel, a 13-episode TV series starting June 24th on CBS.

under-the-dome-art-cbs.jpg


Developed for television - Brian K. Vaughan, Stephen King, Niels Arden Oplev (Dir)
Mike Vogel
Rachelle Lefevre
Colin Ford
Natalie Martinez
Dean Norris
Jeff Fahey

Set in the not too distant future, Under the Dome tells the story of the residents of the small town of Chester's Mill, Maine, who suddenly find themselves cut off from the rest of the world by a mysterious, impenetrable barrier that surrounds the town. As the town begins to tear itself apart through panic, a small group of people attempt to maintain peace and order while also trying to uncover the truth behind the barrier and how to escape from it.

Spoiler :
In the novel's introduction and in many TV and Internet interviews, Steven King beats a dead horse to death about how he had this Dome concept years ago, decades ago, centuries ago, etc. The problem appears to be that the Simpsons' Movie came out about 2 years before his novel, so there is the appearance of copyright infringement. The novel is excellent nonetheless.

The Simsons Movie

The Simpsons: Under the Dome


Youtube trailer

First Look
 
Yeah, because The Simpsons Movie is the first case ever of the 'dome' concept being used in fiction. Even The Truman Show had a dome. Stephen King may have had an original concept for how to use the dome, but the idea of the dome itself is not original, and he'd look like less of an arse if he stopped claiming it was.
 
Trailer doesn't include a tunneling attempt. That's my big criticism. It's not going to be a surprise when it doesn't work, so there's no point hiding their eventual tunneling attempt.

Man, something like that occurring would be such a HUGE revelation for mankind. It would blow the minds of all of our scientists and engineers. Our tech programs would leapfrog soooo quickly
 
I saw Oblivion at the cheap theater tonight. It kind of sucked. Basically, imagine if somebody pitched Moon to a major studio. This is the movie that would happen after five rewrites or so.
Spoiler :
So one of my big issues was the fact that, in spite of the fact that the earth was apparently destroyed a few years in the future, in sixty years, massive leaps in technology have been made. And not only is the tech advanced, everything looks like a goddamn iPod, all shiny and glowy and sleek and covered in white plastic. And the two-man industrial facility installed by an extra-planetary colony looks like an eccentric millionaire's mansion, complete with spiral staircases and an Olympic swimming pool for pretty people to pork in. It all looks damn cool, but it doesn't make sense for the setting. Now, you can argue that this is all justified by the twist at the end, but it totally took me out of the movie until then. And still, you'd think the characters would comment on how suspicious this seems. It never seemed to be hinting at something sinister going on. It just seemed to be BS.

The basic plot was decent enough (if pretty derivative), but the way it was executed was poor. We get tons of exposition about stuff that doesn't make a great deal of sense with minimal thought applied, it turns out not to be true, and then when the truth was revealed, it seemed rushed and confusing. It's possible it was explained well and I just didn't catch it, because I really didn't care whose ass it was and why it was farting.

Action sequences were admittedly pretty good, and they would have been great in a decent movie. Tom Cruise is as good at being Tom Cruise as ever, and Morgan Freeman was pretty solid, although his part is a lot smaller than I'd have liked.
 
Trailer doesn't include a tunneling attempt. That's my big criticism. It's not going to be a surprise when it doesn't work, so there's no point hiding their eventual tunneling attempt.

Unless of course there is no tunneling attempt. Given the relationship between Hollywood sci-fi and logic, I think that's a real possibility.
 
That would be sooooo frustrating, watching an entire season, and no one having tried tunneling. You'd almost want to chuck your beer at the tv
 
That would be sooooo frustrating, watching an entire season, and no one having tried tunneling. You'd almost want to chuck your beer at the tv

With Thirteen episodes scheduled, there's a good possibility we'll see a little bit of everything.:popcorn:
 
That would be sooooo frustrating, watching an entire season, and no one having tried tunneling. You'd almost want to chuck your beer at the tv
Yeah, literally the third thing I'd do would be to try to tunnel. The second would be to try and smash the dome with the heaviest thing I could find, and the first would be to crap my pants.
 
Europa Report

June 27th VOD
August 2nd (USA)

Europa_Report_Official_Poster.jpg


Directed by Sebastián Cordero
Sharlto Copley
Michael Nyqvist
Embeth Davidtz
Daniel Wu

EUROPA REPORT follows a contemporary mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa to investigate the possible existence of alien life within our solar system. When unmanned probes suggest that a hidden ocean could exist underneath Europa’s icy surface and may contain single-celled life, Europa Ventures, a privately funded space exploration company, sends six of the best astronauts from around the world to confirm the data and explore the revolutionary discoveries that may lie in the Europan ocean. After a near-catastrophic technical failure that leads to loss of communication with Earth and the tragic death of a crewmember, the surviving astronauts must overcome the psychological and physical toll of deep space travel, and survive a discovery on Europa more profound than they had ever imagined.

Youtube Trailer
 
Sounds pretty good. I've heard the name before, but haven't seen anything else mentioned. It sounds like they might be trying to combine 2001 and Alien a bit, from that synopsis.
 
Enterprise-425x318.jpg


The Continuing Scientific Relevance Of SciFi

Paramount just handed it to the museum. To them, it was unimportant. A remnant of a failed three-year TV series. They handed it over, most likely assuming that it would sit in a warehouse somewhere, collecting dust on a shelf as the years peeled by.

But that was no ordinary eleven-foot-long model.

That ship was a symbol of hope. Of peace. Of equality. Of a future waiting to be actualized. The Enterprise would grow to become one of the most iconic and treasured symbols in science fiction culture.


“It speaks to some basic human needs that there is a tomorrow, that it’s not all going to be over in a big flash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans. No, ancient astronauts did not build the pyramids. Human beings built them because they’re clever and they work hard. Star Trek is about those things.” – Gene Roddenberry

Platos_Stepchildren_kiss.jpg


Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura (in TOS), often recalls the story about the time she was thinking of quitting Star Trek to return to Broadway, and how it was Martin Luther King, Jr. who talked her out of it. A fan of Star Trek, MLK Jr. mentioned to Nichelle that her show was one of the few he and his wife would allow their children to watch, and that she was a symbol for reform and change. That she was an inspiration. That her work on a science fiction show was helping to change the attitude of a nation, of a world.

As a result, she would go on to film the episode “Plato’s Stepchildren”, the first example of a scripted inter-racial kiss between a white man and black woman on American television.

How’s that for social change?
 
I would like to recommend the recently released scifi movie titled Oblivion. I usually dislike anything that is scifi, and was not very fond of Tom Cruise either, but i enjoyed this movie a lot. Its ending is in my view the best apogee moment in all epic-themed movies in have seen up to now :)
 
Gah, why?

I saw Oblivion recently as well. I remember seeing your thoughts on it over in the movie(s) thread and I had some responses but didn't really feel like hashing out a several-page reply.

For the most part I thought it was good as far as a semi-smart scifi movie (by today's standards), which was nice. It was one of those films that was just frustrating to watch because it comes so close to hitting some truly great points, but ends up falling just short.

The end left some very cool implications, but the hackneyed manner they approached the last 30 minutes made it feel jumbled and unsophisticated.

I thought the main character was really freaking boring. And not just because Tom Cruise was playing him. Tom Cruise was Tom Cruise in this film. He was just there, he didn't particularly harm or help the film by his performance. This is one of those films, much like I Am Legend, which really could have benefited from a quality performance. I thought it would have been really cool if they had played up the protagonist's nostalgia. They hint at it a lot. The Superbowl scene, his constant wearing of a Yankees cap, etc. The film could have worked well with a Smith-type role in I Am Legend where the years of isolation (only 1 person to talk to other than himself) could have made him a bit unwound. This would have been a very neat twist.

Neither of the female characters are particularly interesting. While you can blame them a little bit, much of that comes down to poor writing. They aren't given much of any kind of role to play. Again missed opportunities because this film would have been great if it explored the nature of the relationship between Cruise and his "partner", especially if it examined how that relationship got stressed with the introduction of the 2nd female character. Instead she's just kind of neatly disposed of in about 2 seconds.

Morgan Freeman et al are just kind of there. Freeman gave the role his Freemaniest but there's just nothing there. The whole freedom-fighter movement just felt so tossed in in the last days of writing because the screenwriters went "oh [feces] I guess we have to end this movie, huh?". So yeah. You just end up not caring about them, much like the 2nd female. She's more a MacGuffin to turn Cruise into a rebel so she doesn't really have much of a character to speak of. Again missed opportunities.

The twist seems like it's there just for the sake of a twist. Again; interesting implications and I feel they could have done a lot in terms of internal struggles/interacting with. Instead it's basically just a way for everybody to go "OH" and then move along swiftly to a Resolution. The twist really could have just been that the leader of the aliens was actually Norman Bates dressed as his mother riding a sled while carrying the charred remains of the Statue of Liberty on his back and it would have functionally served the same purpose from a narrative/theme standpoint.

So yeah I think the problem with this film isn't that it's a bad movie, more that it's a disappointing movie. The cinematography, effects, editing sets, and dialogue was mostly good. The movie was solidly shot, and reasonably well directed. I'd say the lighting was probably one of the few real bad decisions from the production standpoint. The actors were neither here nor there. They didn't lift the role, but they didn't harm it either. The main problem with this film is that it sets itself up as an interesting cerebral SciFi film but then doesn't follow through, preferring to play it safe with Big Dumb Action sequences. So yeah. Disappointing.

And I'm sorry I'm not more specific in what I'd have rather they done from a thematic standpoint. I really don't feel like clicking the spoiler button. Deal with it.
 
Pacific Rim

July 12th

Pacific_Rim_FilmPoster.jpeg


Directed by Guillermo del Toro
Charlie Hunnam
Idris Elba
Rinko Kikuchi
Charlie Day
Rob Kazinsky
Max Martini
Ron Perlman

In the near future, giant monsters identified as "Kaiju" have risen from a crevasse in the Pacific Ocean, resulting in a war which takes millions of lives and quickly consumes humanity's resources. To combat this new threat, a special type of weapon is designed: massive robots, known as Jaegers, which are controlled simultaneously by two pilots whose minds are locked in a neural bridge. As time passes, even the powerful Jaegers prove almost defenseless in the face of a relentless enemy. On its last stand and on the verge of defeat, the remaining defending forces of mankind have no choice but to turn to two unlikely heroes—a former pilot (Charlie Hunnam) and an untested trainee (Rinko Kikuchi)—and the weapon they are teamed to pilot; a legendary but seemingly obsolete Jaeger from the early trials of the mechanical titans. Together, man, woman and machine must stand as the human race’s last hope against the mounting apocalypse.

Spoiler :
And who doesn't like Giant Robots, huh?

Guillermo del Toro: ‘Pacific Rim’ Is NOT Japanese Monster Movie Homage



Youtube trailer

Version 2


MarketSaw_08+Oct.+13+23.31.jpg
 
On the small screen:

Under the Dome, based on the Steven King novel, a 13-episode TV series starting June 24th on CBS.

under-the-dome-art-cbs.jpg


Developed for television - Brian K. Vaughan, Stephen King, Niels Arden Oplev (Dir)
Mike Vogel
Rachelle Lefevre
Colin Ford
Natalie Martinez
Dean Norris
Jeff Fahey

Set in the not too distant future, Under the Dome tells the story of the residents of the small town of Chester's Mill, Maine, who suddenly find themselves cut off from the rest of the world by a mysterious, impenetrable barrier that surrounds the town. As the town begins to tear itself apart through panic, a small group of people attempt to maintain peace and order while also trying to uncover the truth behind the barrier and how to escape from it.

Spoiler :
In the novel's introduction and in many TV and Internet interviews, Steven King beats a dead horse to death about how he had this Dome concept years ago, decades ago, centuries ago, etc. The problem appears to be that the Simpsons' Movie came out about 2 years before his novel, so there is the appearance of copyright infringement. The novel is excellent nonetheless.

The Simsons Movie

The Simpsons: Under the Dome


Youtube trailer

First Look
The book was good, a kind of "Lord of the Flies" with the Dome replacing the island setting.
 
I saw Oblivion recently as well. I remember seeing your thoughts on it over in the movie(s) thread and I had some responses but didn't really feel like hashing out a several-page reply.

That was actually this thread. But your assessment seems pretty reasonable, based on a broader perspective rather than a persnickety geeky one. The biggest flaw was that there simply wasn't enough to keep you invested in things. Maybe with better execution it could have been a really good movie, but I think some really good movies already exist with similar premises.
 
The Wolverine

July 26th

He's turning Japanese...
Wolverine-Film-Teaser.jpg


Directed by James Mangold
Hugh Jackman
Hiroyuki Sanada (Last Samurai)
Will Yun Lee

Set sometime after X-Men: The Last Stand, Logan travels to Japan, where he engages a mysterious figure from his past in a fight that has lasting consequences. Vulnerable for the first time, and pushed to his physical and emotional limits, he confronts not only lethal samurai steel, but also his inner struggle against his own immortality,...

Youtube trailer
 
Back
Top Bottom