That kind of stimulation was not what I had in mind

[warpus]

Very aptly named

 

[Terxpahseyton]

Well it depends on what you are watching.
Some do show a very ineffective form of birth control.

 

[GoodGame]

It depends on the hardcore pornography.

...or the couple.

 

[cardgame]

A lot of schools took advantage of CIPA and blocked atheist websites. [Slightly unrelated.]

It probably wouldn't happen to libraries, but there's always the chance...

 

[_random_]

One of my favorite things to do in the library is to glance over the shoulders of porn-watchers and observe their reactions. I'd hate to have that taken away, but I can definitely see the drawbacks, and there'd be plenty of legal precedent to stopping it from happening. It would at least qualify as public lewdness or public display of offensive material I'd imagine.
Edit: Looked up some Washington law. Somebody's guilty of indecent exposure if "he or she intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm." Seems like this would fit pretty well.

 

[Quackers]

What are their reactions random?


Somehow the best way is to embarrass them so much they will feel ashamed about ever doing it again. Then again if you are watching porn in a public library you don't have any shame either..

 

[_random_]

They'll typically close or minimize their window hastily and try to act like they weren't doing anything they'd be ashamed of, but the guilt and/or embarrassment are always quite apparent.

 

[Yeekim]

In a somewhat varying degree it's somewhat typical human behavior none the less.

"Somewhat varying degree" can't be stressed enough here.