Cheezy the Wiz
Socialist In A Hurry
I would consider running. I have a rather large district to cover, though. Three counties.
I sent out twitter messages to the various occupy groups in Illinois, asking for more clarification. I'll let you know if I hear anything back. Integral, of course, always has a job with me.
Information about the 99% Declaration and the Convention. I use the word "information" in the loosest possible sense.
I'm seriously thinking about running. However I am God-awful at campaigning so I'd settle for being downtown's in-house economist.
This is why I'm exploring the possibility of getting involved in creating some tracks a switch, and a train station.Yes please do that, I wanna see how this plays out. No offence, but this seems like a train wreck happening at 10mph. But everyone is too busy jumping on the train to notice.
You can do anything if you're the one making it up.Can you run as anonymous?
If they have a declaration, why do they need representatives?
If they have a declaration, why do they need representatives? It sounds like having a debate in the Korean Worker's Party. "Should we do what Comrade Kim says immedaitely or should we do what Comrade Kim says at this instant? Debate!"
Yes please do that, I wanna see how this plays out. No offence, but this seems like a train wreck happening at 10mph. But everyone is too busy jumping on the train to notice.
I did. It seems contradictory to have a bottom-up movement that has a declaration written by a self-appointed group and then imposed on its members. If this is the declaration, are they going to permit dissent? Candidates can't even raise private funds, everything needs to be given to them by a committee. Well, who appoints those committees? By what metric are these committees going to choose who is eligible to run or receive funds? It sounds like a predetermined outcome.Uh, no. While some in the movement took it upon themselves to deliver a preliminary declaration of preferences, the point of a convention to is to decide what the members of the movement actually want. You can't have democracy by "whoever writes the first memo wins".
Also, did you really pick the most top down example possible to describe a bottom-up movement?
That's a very valid question. It doesn't have to be. That was one starting suggestion. But it's pretty obvious to think of why you might have that, and pretty obvious why you wouldn't mandate your other suggestions. I've been thinking about it to, and I'm not sure it's the best rule, but I think it's okay. I think it would be bad if all the delegates were fiery young men, but given the nature of each area sending their own figure head, that's very likely. Having a greater diversity of perspective within those who agree with the movement is better.Why does it have to be 1 male and 1 female? What kind of crock is that?
Why not 2 males or 2 females or 2 kittens?
Those are valid concerns and questions. I look at this in a completely different way. There's no self appointed people imposing on others. There are people taking the time to provide perhaps a working starting point for a movement to add to or to edit or to change. It's a political movement, by definition it's going to have leaders and followers. Someone writing a declaration for the movement doesn't mean it's imposed on the movement, it's an offered suggestion to be taken or discarded. The ideas thrown around now are just trying to figure out a good and fair way to make this happen. It's messy, and that's why some of us have an interest in helping guide the process.I did. It seems contradictory to have a bottom-up movement that has a declaration written by a self-appointed group and then imposed on its members. If this is the declaration, are they going to permit dissent? Candidates can't even raise private funds, everything needs to be given to them by a committee. Well, who appoints those committees? By what metric are these committees going to choose who is eligible to run or receive funds? It sounds like a predetermined outcome.
Yeah, so I reached out to as many of the Occupy groups as I could around here. There are apparently several beyond #OccupyChicago...multiple neighborhoods have their own (OccupyPilsen, OccupySouthSide), as well as affinity groups (OccupytheBarrio, OccupyTheHood), which makes organization very difficult. Nobody seemed particularly interested or invested in the convention...the groups right now are focusing on drawing in organized labor to oppose the Mayor's budget. That's cool and all, but taking garbage collection away from local Alderman isn't going to set the world on fire, you know? Nobody answered any of my questions.
I've been walking through the protests on my way to work lately. I can't speak for other cities, but around here, it's really just sad.
Good work, DT.
I just visited Occupy Wall Street last night.
Or rather, the empty park that they were supposed to visit. Pulling a Downtown I naturally of course walked into the nearby "The Whiskey Bar"--a classy establishment for sure, flanked on either side by bail bond buildings--and ordered a coke. They told me not to bother, there was nothing left.
If we want a convention we'll have to make one ourselves.
Do we want one?
Cheezy the Wiz said:If it winds up being you, me, Downtown, and Integral founding a political party...well, that could be interesting!