The POTUS decides to be a chicken, pulls out of Afghanistan

Yes but given how slow these articles are coming out and how much women are still doing, the Taliban aren’t having an easy time implementing their vision.
From what I know the Taliban decrees are simply issued by Akhundzada from Herat, but aren't actually codified into law. So some women still don't cover their faces, despite the decree (and not all women covered their faces during the Taliban's previous stint, contrary to popular propaganda) but they still can be arrested or punished by the morality police when the mood is on them

To put it in a nutshell, in executive terms Taliban government is as loose as it is harsh legislatively
 
The Taliban isn't one group, it is many groups loosely held together ranging from "moderate" to ultra-conservative and everything in between. Unfortunately, the ultra-conservatives seem to have the most followers or something meaning they usually call the shots.
 
The Taliban isn't one group, it is many groups loosely held together ranging from "moderate" to ultra-conservative and everything in between. Unfortunately, the ultra-conservatives seem to have the most followers or something meaning they usually call the shots.
Actually the Taliban is a single group, yes within the group individuals have different positions and views, but so far as I know they're not actually sub-groups, though you could broadly generalise two camps: pro-women's-education and anti-women's-education.

Where the confusion arises is that many of the figures or people associated with the Taliban aren't the actual Taliban. Some Afghan warlords sided with the US, and some with the Taliban, not due to sharing the same ideology, but because they bet on the Taliban coming on top once the Americans would inevitably leave, or possibly even because they genuinely believed in joining with other Afghans against outsiders. Also A number of young men who fought as footsoldiers for the Taliban wouldn't necessarily be part of the actual Taliban either
 
there are as many Talibans as there are tribes in Afghanistan but it doesn't matter as Taliban was custom made to overcome that particular weakness of Afghan politics . The Reagan era Mujahadeen and like am spelling it in a different way for each post or something were on the verge of breaking down after their failure to defeat Necibullah , with taking Kabil .

then America bribed Dostum of the Uzbeks .

the Peshtun could not take Kabil again . Massoud or Ahmet Şah Mesut (as ı greatly prefer to write the name) was quite a leader and tribal differences were too much and Hikmetyar was so repulsive or whatever and drug trafficking and warlording was so much easier . Pakistan decided to open up trade routes to Central Asia . This is what they said , but it is BS and a lie . Pakistan created a proxy force to control Afghanistan and to get the ability to intervene against the Turkic Republics . Benazir Bhutto's father is among those who truly despised Lord Vader and warming up to a general opposition against Turkish "influence" in the Subcontinent ; which used to be a peculiar fear of the times . They created a "tribeless" force , above petty politics that supposedly saved their truck drivers taken hostage by bandits . Actually it was a force that was under their direct control and they could endlessly reinforce with their own Peshtun and similarly inclined youths . They started small and success begat success in the way of an avalanche . Sadly , the designated leader , Molla Omer was implacably honest . And pious , too ... They swept anything before them . But ? They couldn't take Kabil ...

then America bribed Dostum of the Uzbeks .

this was the Northern Alliance days . Tribal limits defined the frontiers . Pakistan reached the end of its tether . El Kaide ? Good on talk , ready to win after enough Saudi bribes . Something should have happened . With the Pakistani nuclear thing declared and the junta leader Müşerref being an open fan of a football club in Istanbul and the Jihadism thing having become a cancer that still eats Pakistan from within , it was a little war with India . Which cleared the deck in America . Truthers is an insult Americans use against those who think 9/11 was an inside job . Mesut knew the lot were out to kill him . Real stupid of him to accept a TV crew that would turn out to be suicide bombers . Or bribes that ensured the vigorous search was not that good . Or maybe he just wanted to die , before his soul was further corrupted before the American intervention he felt and actually knew was coming . His bid to look for support against Americans in Paris having failed to garner any support except stern warnings that he should stop dealing with the devil .

el Kaide ran whenever it could or was cleared by the Americans . Doesn't matter . Pakistan was "invaded" . The Penjabi exiles who used to dominate would take pride in their "English" upbringing , would listen to you . Time to time , they would even agree the advice offered was reasonable and to their benefit , too . Today's Pakistan is under the thumb of the American Saudi and the British Qatar . Money is so cool .

a lot of money was made in Afghanistan , too . Who can ever forget the dowsing rods sold at quite a profit to find mines and homemade explosives ? Then Bidon willed he would run . But , yeah , it would be even worse under Trump . But , no , the tribal differences would still mark the fronts .

uh , why ?

then America bribed Dostum of the Uzbeks .

he was calling himself a Marshall by this time .

it is powerful enough , this Taliban thing , that they have sent hundreds of thousands of people over here . To fight when Qatar orders them to . Am pretty sure Dostum will be in place by the time of that comes .
 
I don’t think it’s that coordinated.

No, but it's about how much money you have.

I don't think Afghanistan will plan on integrating into the world economy any more than Cambodian Khmer Rouge did. That could be the closest parallel here.

There was a development boom in southeast Asia that went nowhere in the 1990s. An attempt to expand industry all over the place via Japanese, Chinese, and American investors looking for more factory floor space.

But Afghanistan has lithium, and the Chinese want lithium. So I'd bet it becomes an easily exploitable mining colony ala the DRC.

Taliban's goal is to simply round up child slaves and force them to extract ore at gunpoint. Your phones and electric vehicles will go down in price as well. Great investment opportunity!
 
No, but it's about how much money you have.



There was a development boom in southeast Asia that went nowhere in the 1990s. An attempt to expand industry all over the place via Japanese, Chinese, and American investors looking for more factory floor space.

But Afghanistan has lithium, and the Chinese want lithium. So I'd bet it becomes an easily exploitable mining colony ala the DRC.

Taliban's goal is to simply round up child slaves and force them to extract ore at gunpoint. Your phones and electric vehicles will go down in price as well. Great investment opportunity!
Lithium use may have peaked or will peak soon.

 

Echoes of Bagram: Moazzam Begg returns to Afghanistan​

Human rights advocate Moazzam Begg returns to Afghanistan to battle demons and champion justice in the shadow of war.

Haunted by nightmares of torture and abuse, British human rights campaigner Moazzam Begg decides to return to Afghanistan to confront the horrors of his past.
Moazzam was detained at the notorious Bagram and Guantanamo Bay prisons without charge or trial, before being released in 2003. Ever since, Moazzam has fought for the rights of those imprisoned during the so-called, US-led war on terror.
In Afghanistan, Moazzam advocates for the freedom of Mohammad Rahim, the last Afghan held in Guantanamo Bay.
As the nation grapples with the scars of war under new Taliban leadership, can Moazzam ever make peace with his past?
Echoes of Bagram is a film by Michael McEvoy and Horia El Hadad.
 
An article that sounds a little pro-Taliban, but an interesting view on the possible talks in Doha

The ‘inclusive’ Afghan government Afghans do not want

On February 18, UN Secretary-General António Guterres will host a meeting of special envoys for Afghanistan in Doha, Qatar. The Taliban had earlier confirmed it will be sending a delegation to the event, which will also be attended by other Afghan political stakeholders and representatives of the Afghan civil society.

This gathering is being held to accommodate one of the recommendations presented by the UN Special Coordinator for Afghanistan Feridun Sinirlioğlu in his November report (PDF) on the state of affairs in the country.

Although the report highlighted the need to focus on confidence-building measures between the international community and Afghan stakeholders, which would imply identifying areas of possible cooperation that are not politically sensitive, some difficult issues are bound to be brought up at the meeting. Prime among them would be the matter of the formation of an inclusive government in Afghanistan. This demand has been reiterated by regional and international actors as one of the key preconditions for the recognition of the Taliban government.

Seeking inclusive governance after a conflict is a routine diplomatic intervention. The idea is that inclusion is vital in peace-building, as it can resolve grievances produced by exclusion and prevent the re-emergence of violence.

However, the term evokes unpleasant memories for the Afghan people because it reminds them of the Bonn Conference that followed the US invasion of Afghanistan where the exiled and reviled warlords of the country were given a clean slate and an opportunity to participate in the subsequent power-sharing arrangement.

This inclusion of the warlords effectively meant impunity for crimes and played a vital role in the failure of the subsequent attempts at state-building in Afghanistan. The warlords were also spoilers of the peace process with the Taliban, the failure of which led to the eventual fall of Kabul to Taliban forces in August 2021.

The Taliban has used the negative sentiment the term invokes in the population to its advantage, refusing to succumb to international pressure to include other Afghan political forces in its government. It has made clear that it considers such pressure an attempt to repeat the experience of the Bonn Conference. This is not an unpopular move, as the Afghan people dread the return of warlordism to Afghanistan.

Some of these exiled warlords who still have eyes on power include Abdul Rashid Dostum who has been accused of sexually assaulting political opponents and of committing war crimes during the US invasion and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf who was one of the warlords responsible for the Afshar massacre of 1993 in which up to 1,000 people were butchered in a western district of Kabul.

Ahmad Massoud, the son of the late Ahmad Shah Massoud, who was also involved in the Afshar massacre and the Afghan civil war, has also recently emerged as a political player. He is currently attempting to rally exiled warlords and allies of his father to fight against the Taliban while seeking funding from foreign governments.

Apart from the warlords, there is a great number of former Afghan officials of the previous government who have expressed a desire to come back to power. Many of them are being included in conversations on the future of Afghanistan despite standing accused of large-scale corruption and even drug trafficking.


It is not clear if any of the warlords or other problematic political players will participate in the meeting in Doha. The invitation process has not been transparent and it seems attempts were made to include some controversial figures, as the Taliban warned it would not attend if the selection of the Afghan participants was not agreeable to its leadership.

If the meeting in Doha is meant to find ways to build bridges with the Taliban, then it should not be a venue where the inclusion of warlords and former Afghan officials of ill repute is pushed. Such a move would be counterproductive as it would make the Taliban more reluctant to engage. The issue of larger participation in the Taliban government can be brought up when enough trust has been built and momentum generated.

While it is clear who should not be part of a future government, finding qualified and trusted figures from non-Taliban political forces can be a challenge. That is because, between 2001 and 2021, the elections in the country were repeatedly rigged, making it unclear who represents the will of the Afghan people.

Ultimately, the Taliban should be allowed to choose who beyond its movement to include in government. This is not an ideal outcome but it would be an improvement on the current status quo.

The demand for the Taliban to break its current monopoly on power should be framed differently if it is ever to be realised. The term inclusivity not only is a non-starter for the Taliban but also evokes bad memories in Afghanistan’s general population.
 
Nothing will come out of that. Those defeated and kicked out have no power base to return. No one is going to invade Afghanistan and put them there again.
In this the UN is engaging in fantasies of imposing a government from the outside as it did in Libya and Yemen. Unlike Libya and Yemen, there is no ongoing foreign military intervention to back a foreign-imposed government chosen by some conference. The countries with the power to do one are not interested in that.
 
Nothing will come out of that. Those defeated and kicked out have no power base to return. No one is going to invade Afghanistan and put them there again.
Hey, it seems like it is China's turn next. It will be a great place to test out their army.....
 
Afghanistan: Archaeological sites 'bulldozed for looting

By Kawoon Khamoosh
BBC World Service

Dozens of archaeological sites in Afghanistan have been bulldozed to allow systematic looting, according to researchers at the University of Chicago.
They say their analysis of satellite photos provides the first definitive photographic evidence that looting patterns that began under the previous government have continued since the Taliban returned to power in 2021.
Ancient settlements dating back to the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age - some earlier than 1000BC - are among those they say have been damaged.
Most of the sites identified are in northern Afghanistan's Balkh region, which more than two millennia ago was the heartland of Bactria.
It was one of the richest and most populous regions of ancient Afghanistan under the Achaemenid Empire in the 6th Century BC.
By 327BC, Alexander the Great had conquered the region and married a Bactrian woman named Roxana, after defeating the Achaemenid ruler.


Located on a major east-west Silk Route, the region's central city Bactra - later called Balkh - has been a centre of both the Zoroastrian faith and Buddhist learning. It later became an important Islamic city.
The researchers from the University of Chicago's Center for Cultural Heritage Preservation have identified more than 29,000 archaeological sites across Afghanistan, helped by satellite imagery and other tools.
But they spotted a new pattern in the Balkh region from 2018 onwards.
They say they have identified specks on the images that they are confident are bulldozers because of the way they appear and disappear over time, and the tracks they leave in their wake.
These freshly bulldozed areas then appear in later images, covered with pits dug by looters, Prof Gil Stein, the centre's director explained.
"Basically, the people were clearing out vast areas to make it easier to loot the site systematically," he told me.


Image caption,
This image was sourced by the BBC and corresponds to a location and dates provided by the University of Chicago researchers
His team say 162 ancient settlements were "devastated at an astonishing rate of one a week" between 2018 and 2021, and the practice continued at 37 sites after that, under the Taliban.
The researchers are not publishing the exact locations to avoid giving information to potential looters.
Work documenting many of the sites is in its early stages.
This means researchers simply don't know what is buried in the sites, which are mainly mounds, fortresses, early roadside inns known as caravanserais and canal systems.
But only 97km (60 miles) away lies Tela Tepe, where a hoard of 2,000-year-old Bactrian gold was discovered in 1978.
The "Hill of Gold" contained 20,000 rare items including gold jewellery, an intricate crown and coins, dubbed the Lost Treasures of Afghanistan.

"You can unearth layers of a civilisation in each mound," says Said Reza Huseini, a research fellow at Cambridge University.
Born in Balkh, he spent time in his 20s as a volunteer surveying archaeological sites in northern Afghanistan, including some of those the researchers say have been bulldozed. He was shocked to see the images from the University of Chicago.
"When I hear about it, I feel as if my soul is dying," he said.
There are no clear answers about who is behind the apparent destruction.
Prof Stein says it is significant that the pattern began under the previous government - led by former President Ashraf Ghani - and continued under the Taliban.
Mr Ghani's government was weak and did not have full control of some parts of the country.
Balkh, including northern Afghanistan's largest city Mazar-i-Sharif, was among the first areas to fall to the Taliban before they captured the capital Kabul in August 2021.

Prof Stein believes the sites may be being looted by people who are wealthy and powerful enough to be able to buy or rent earth-moving equipment, and to move it to rural areas "with nobody interfering".
Mr Huseini says some archaeological sites in the area were being looted before he left the country in 2009.
"No-one could do excavations and digging without the permission of local strongmen and militias," he told me.
"For them, the historic value is not important, they dig and destroy to see what they can find. I've seen it with my own eyes - they even used a soil sieve to check for stuff."
He says he was once part of efforts to secure archaeological access to an ancient site where a militia commander was planting opium.
Back in 2001, the Taliban caused shock around the world when they blew up the 1,500-year-old Bamiyan Buddhas, once the largest standing Buddha statues in the world, during their first stint in power.
But when they returned two decades later, they said they would respect the country's ancient heritage.
The Taliban's acting deputy minister for information and culture, Atiqullah Azizi, rejected the claims that looting is taking place, saying an 800-strong unit has been assigned to look after historic sites.
He told the BBC some organisations had sent images to the ministry regarding "bulldozer movements and people moving soil" but said that "we sent various teams to check the sites and I can reassure you that there hasn't been a single incident in any of those sites".

The Taliban's defence ministry also said three people were arrested in September, accused of trying to smuggle a stash of antiquities worth about $27m (£21.4), including statues, mummies, a golden crown, a book and swords.
It says the items were handed over to the national museum and the investigation is continuing.
I shared Mr Azizi's response with Prof Stein.
He said he couldn't speculate as to why he denied the looting claims, but added: "We can show there was continuity even across two very different political regimes."
Prof Stein believes looted artefacts are smuggled out of Afghanistan through Iran, Pakistan and other countries and then end up in Europe, North America, and east Asia.
There is a chance some could be showcased, undated and untitled, in auctions and museums around the world.
He points out it is hard to track them down if they have never been catalogued, but he believes it is important to try - and to protect the locations where many more could be found.
"The heritage of Afghanistan is really part of world heritage and something that honestly belongs to all of us," Prof Stein says.
 

Pakistan's army and foreign office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the reported strikes, which come after unidentified militants attacked a military post in Pakistan on Saturday, killing seven security force members.
In a statement provided to state television, the Pakistani military said "a recent wave of terrorism has the full support and assistance of Afghanistan". It did not mention any air strikes, but said that Saturday's attack was carried out by militants who had "safe haven" in Afghanistan.

How different from the bonhomous 'I bomb my rebels, you bomb mine' situation with Iran last year, this looks different
 
Milley confirms he got piece of paper ordering full withdrawal from Afghanistan during final Trump days
Shortly after former President Donald Trump lost his reelection bid in November 2020, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley was given a piece of paper that called for the withdrawal of U.S. forces in Somalia and Afghanistan.

Milley, who has since retired as a general in the Army, told lawmakers that he received the note days after Trump fired then-Secretary of Defense Mark Esper in the aftermath of the election. The piece of paper, he told lawmakers on the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday, had the president’s signature on it and called for the complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from Somalia by Dec. 15, 2020, and from Afghanistan by Jan. 15, 2021.
“Acting Secretary of Defense [Christopher] Miller and I and others went over to the White House to confirm that order because we had not been consulted on that,” Milley explained. “So we did, and that order was then subsequently rescinded.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...rder-withdrawal-afghanistan-final-trump-days/
 

“Do women want the rights that Westerners are talking about? They are against Sharia and clerics’ opinions, the clerics who toppled Western democracy,” he said.

“I told the Mujahedin that we tell the Westerners that we fought against you for 20 years and we will fight 20 and even more years against you,” he said, emphasising the need for resilience in opposing women’s rights among Taliban foot soldiers.

“It did not finish [when you left]. It does not mean we would now just sit and drink tea. We will bring Sharia to this land,” he added. “It did [not] finish after we took over Kabul. No, we will now bring Sharia into action.”

He talks like an Islamophobic cartoon
 
he is an Islamophobic cartoon . That's two or three centuries of British meddling in defence of their precious India you are looking at .
 

'If we can't speak, why live?': BBC meets women after new Taliban law​

The daily English lessons that Shabana attends are the highlight of her day. Taking the bus in Kabul to the private course with her friends, chatting and laughing with them, learning something new for one hour each day - it’s a brief respite from the emptiness that has engulfed her life since the Taliban took over Afghanistan.
In another country, Shabana* would have been graduating from high school next year, pursuing her dream to get a business degree. In Afghanistan, she and all teenage girls have been barred from formal education for three years.
Now even the small joys that were making life bearable are fraught with fear after a new law was announced saying if a woman is outside her home, even her voice must not be heard.
“When we got out, we’re scared. When we’re on the bus, we’re scared. We don’t dare to take down our masks. We even avoid speaking among ourselves, thinking that if someone from the Taliban hears us they could stop and question us,” she says.
The BBC has been in Afghanistan, allowing rare access to the country's women and girls - as well as Taliban spokespeople - reacting to the new law, which was imposed by the Taliban’s supreme leader Haibatullah Akhundzada.
The law gives the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Ministry – the Taliban’s morality police - sweeping powers to enforce a stringent code of conduct for Afghan citizens.
For women who have already had their freedoms crushed bit by bit by a relentless series of decrees, it delivers another blow.
“If we can’t speak, why even live? We’re like dead bodies moving around,” Shabana says.

“When I learnt about the new law, I decided not to attend the course any more. Because if I go out, I’ll end up speaking and then something bad might happen. Maybe I won’t return home safely. But then my mother encouraged me to continue.”
In the three years since the Taliban takeover, it's become clear that even if edicts aren’t strictly imposed, people start self-regulating out of fear. Women continue to be visible in small numbers on the streets of cities like Kabul, but nearly all of them now are covered from head to toe in loose black clothes or dark blue burqas, and most of them cover their faces with only their eyes visible, the impact of a decree announced last year.
“Every moment you feel like you’re in a prison. Even breathing has become difficult here," said Nausheen, an activist.
Until last year, whenever new restrictions were announced, she was among small groups of women who marched on the streets of Kabul and other cities, demanding their rights.

The protests were violently cracked down on by the Taliban’s forces on multiple occasions, until they stopped altogether.
Nausheen was detained last year. “The Taliban dragged me into a vehicle saying ‘Why are you acting against us? This is an Islamic system.’ They took me to a dark, frightening place and held me there, using terrible language against me. They also beat me,” she says, breaking down into tears.
“When we were released from detention we were not the same people as before and that’s why we stopped protesting,” she adds. “I don’t want to be humiliated any more because I’m a woman. It is better to die than to live like this.”
Now Afghan women are showing their dissent by posting videos of themselves online, their faces covered, singing songs about freedom. “Let’s become one voice, let’s walk together holding hands and become free of this cruelty” are the lines of one such song.

Taliban government deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat, who didn’t want to be pictured with a woman or sit directly opposite me, justified the new edict, which came accompanied with copious footnotes - references to religious texts.
“The law approved by the supreme leader is in accordance with Islamic Sharia law. Any religious scholar can check its references,” he says.
Shireen, a teacher, does not agree.
“This is their own interpretation of Sharia. Islam has given the right to both men and women to choose if they want to study and progress.
"If they say that women’s voices should not be heard, let’s go back to history. There are so many women in Islamic history who have spoken out.”

Shireen is part of a network of Afghan women running secret schools quietly rebelling against the restrictions. Already operating under a great deal of risk, often having to move the location of the school for safety, the new law has compounded her fears.
The danger of discovery is so great, she cannot speak to us at home, instead choosing a discreet location.
“Every morning I wake up asking God to make the day pass safely. When the new law came, I explained all its rules to my students and told them things would be more difficult. But I am so tired of all this, sometimes I just want to scream,” she says. “They don’t see women as human beings, just as tools whose only place is inside the home.”
Karina, a psychologist who consults with a network of secret schools, has previously told us that Afghan women are suffering from a ‘pandemic of suicidal thoughts’ because of the restrictions against them.
After the new law was announced she says she had a surge in calls asking for help. “A friend of mine messaged me to say this was her last message. She was thinking of ending her life. They feel all hope is gone and there is no point in continuing living,” she said. “And it’s becoming more and more difficult to counsel them.”

I asked Hamdullah Fitrat about the Taliban government’s responsibility towards women and girls in their country who are being driven into depression and suicidal thoughts because they’re banned from education.
“Our sisters' education is an important issue. We’re trying to resolve this issue which is the demand of a lot of our sisters,” the spokesman said.
But three years on, do they really expect people to believe them?
“We are awaiting a decision from our leadership. When it is made, we will all be told about it,” he replied.
From earlier meetings with Taliban officials, it has been evident for a while that there are divisions within the Taliban government on the issue of women’s education, with some wanting it to be restarted. But the Kandahar-based leadership has remained intransigent, and there has been no public breaking of ranks with the supreme leader’s diktats.
We have seen some evidence of the difference in views. Not far from Kabul, we were unexpectedly given access to a midwife training course regularly run by the Taliban’s public health ministry. It was under way when we visited, and because ours was a last-minute visit, we know it was not put on for us to see.
More than a dozen women in their 20s were attending the course being conducted by a senior female doctor. The course is a mix of theory and practical sessions.
The students couldn’t speak freely but many said they were happy to be able to do this work.
“My family feels so proud of me. I have left my children at home to come here, but they know I’m serving the country. This works gives me so much positive energy,” said Safia.
Many acknowledged their privilege, and some expressed fear about whether even this might be stopped eventually. The Taliban’s health ministry didn’t answer questions about how they would find students to do this course in the future, if girls were not receiving formal education after grade six.
Public health, security, arts and craft are among a handful of sectors where women have been able to continue working in parts of the country. But it isn’t a formal decree that gives them permission. It’s happening through a quiet understanding between ground-level Taliban officials, NGOs and other stakeholders involved.
The new law leaves even this informal system vulnerable to the scrutiny of the Taliban’s morality police.

Sources in humanitarian agencies have told us they are grappling to understand how the law should be interpreted but they believe it will make operations more difficult.
The law was announced less than two months after the Taliban attended UN-led talks on engagement with Afghanistan for the first time – a meeting that Afghan civil society representatives and women’s rights activists had been kept out of, at the insistence of the Taliban.
It’s led many in the international community to question whether it was worth accepting the Taliban’s conditions for a meeting, and what the future of engagement with them might look like.
Reacting to the new law, the EU put out a sharply worded statement describing the restrictions as ‘systematic and systemic abuses… which may amount to gender persecution which is a crime against humanity’. It also said the decree creates ‘another self-imposed obstacle to normalised relations and recognition by the international community’.
“The values laid out in the law are accepted in Afghan society. There are no problems. We want the international community, especially the UN and others to respect Islamic laws, traditions and the values of Muslim societies,” Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat said.
Less than two weeks ago the Taliban’s Vice and Virtue Ministry said it would no longer co-operate with the UN mission in Afghanistan because of its criticism of the law.
It’s evidence that relations which seemed to be progressing just two months ago, appear to have now hit a significant roadblock.
“I believe that when it comes to aid, the world should continue helping Afghanistan. But when it comes to talking to the Taliban, there should be a rule that in each discussion women must be present. And if that can’t happen, they [the international community] should stop talking to them,” psychologist Karina said.
“The world must care about what’s happening with Afghan women, because if it doesn’t this mentality could easily spread to them, to their homes.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgedlz5wx88o
 
Back
Top Bottom