All the conservative leaders who are not wingnuts have to go to war with all the conservative leaders who are wingnuts, and either drive them out, or go into opposition on all of their policies until they are driven out.
"Shooting at a playground," while accurate, doesn't really give a true impression of this event. A bunch of late teen early twenty somethings gathered in a park at one in the morning isn't the image produced by that phrase, but that was the actual target here. Without steering fully into "victim blaming" territory, there is a big difference between getting shot while shopping at WalMart and getting shot while hanging out in a park at one in the morning.
All the conservative leaders who are not wingnuts have to go to war with all the conservative leaders who are wingnuts, and either drive them out, or go into opposition on all of their policies until they are driven out.
Kevin McCarthy (GOP leader in the House) is blaming video games for these mass shootings.
He says he's 'seen studies' that back this up and of course the Fox News host doesn't dispute that despite all of the studies done that refute this. And we'd have more definitive studies if the GOP would allow the CDC (center for disease control) study gun violence.
Edit: Funny thing, the article points out that no less than Antoni Scalia argued in court that studies show there is no link between video games and mass shootings.
Man, I hate it when politichristians say stuff like that. Church is for praising and communing with god, period. It isn't a child management tool or a political power focusing lens.
All the conservative leaders who are not wingnuts have to go to war with all the conservative leaders who are wingnuts, and either drive them out, or go into opposition on all of their policies until they are driven out.
I expect the shooter will be charged with a series of "hate crimes." iirc, in the United States, the terror you are trying to inflict on a population by murdering a small number of that population is not itself a crime, only the murders themselves are.
Apparently, according to the FBI, the attackers need to be members of a foreign group, or at least make reference to one, for it to be considered a terrorist act. Acts of homegrown white supremacists are classified as hate crimes.
They will do anything to move the argument away form the reality that his manifesto was a picture perfect version of the Republican party stance these days. Of course why they bother is beyond me, their base are largely blaming democrats for all of this on Fox News comments sections. So I think the brand is safe from mass murder bad optics, the base doesn't care and would not mind seeing more as long as dems are held at bay.
Apparently, according to the FBI, the attackers need to be members of a foreign group, or at least make reference to one, for it to be considered a terrorist act. Acts of homegrown white supremacists are classified as hate crimes.
Without steering fully into "victim blaming" territory, there is a big difference between getting shot while shopping at WalMart and getting shot while hanging out in a park at one in the morning.
What is so bad about hanging out in the park at one in the morning? I would like not getting shot in either the WalMarts (well, former WalMarts here) and the park at one in the morning.
Unfortunately, at that very moment, Fox was forced to cut away from the reporter they’d sent to El Paso, Texas, to make the case that the United States was facing an unsustainable influx of immigrants to report the breaking story that a young man had concluded that the United States was facing an unsustainable influx of immigrants and traveled to El Paso, Texas, to take matters into his own hands. Here’s one of the most awkward, shameful transitions in television history:
I mean it's hard instigating mass murder daily. It's hard work.
Certainly isn't. None of them are. Seeing as we're all into making statistical cases these days, it's pretty cheap for a pretty big right compared to a lot of the alternatives. But flashy costs and sympathetic victims. It's always more important when it feels more local.
What? By «a pretty big right», do you mean the right to own assault weapons and not having proper checks before people can buy them?
Cause it seems like a very trivial little right that currently just exists for people who wants to have fun shooting guns, when hundreds of millions of people live perfectly prosperous, liberal and democratic lives without that right... We even get to own and shoot guns, within certain limits.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.